“…Ankle muscle strength was evaluated by measuring isometric eversion, inversion, plantarflexion, and dorsiflexion contraction using a hand-held dynamometer, and dynamic balance was assessed using the Y-balance test (YBT; anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral); the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) was used for the subjective evaluation. Measurements were conducted at weeks 1, 4, and 8. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Outcome assessment was determined by the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Short Form 36-item health survey (SF-36), time to radiographic union or fusion, and wound-healing complications at a minimum of 2 years after their surgery. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…At 3- and 12 months patient-reported outcome was examined using validated questionnaires (ATRS and FAOS), and functional outcome using the heel-rise test. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Primary outcome measure is the Karlsson scoring scale; secondary outcomes are FAOS (subscales), number of recurrent ankle injuries, Visual Analogue Scales of pain and satisfaction and adverse events. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The Karlsson score and the FAOS were evaluated at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-three patients (52 % males) were randomized, 66 patients were treated with tape, 58 patients with a semi-rigid brace and 62 patients with a lace-up brace. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot, VISA-A, VAS, and FAOS scores were not also statistically different between these two suture methods (p > 0.05). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Significant differences of shortening the return to work and hospital stays of IWB rehabilitation protocol were confirmed(5.7 vs. 8.0 days, 6.0 vs. 8.0 days in the IBW and DWB groups, respectively). In FAOS, there was a significant difference in the sport factor evaluated at postoperative 3 months(75.5 vs 68.5, respectively). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The primary outcome is patient-reported pain as assessed by the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) - Pain subscale, and the secondary outcome is the incidence of procedure-specific complications at up to 12 months postoperatively. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Secondary outcome measures are time to resumption of work and sports, functional outcomes (SF-36, FAOS, FAAM), complication rate, composition of osteoprogenitors in cB + cBMA and cost-effectiveness. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) was used. Esthetic outcome surveys were carried out. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Clinical evaluation included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, Olerud and Molander score (OMAS), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score as well as complications. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Secondary outcomes included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Algometry, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the 12 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Radiologic and functional outcomes (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score FAOS, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [FAAM], Short Form–36 Health Survey [SF-36], Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment [SMFA], and visual analog scale [VAS] pain scores) were obtained at 3 and 12 months and the last follow-up (mean 31.9 months). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Key secondary objectives: Prediction of maternal and fetal adverse outcomes (MAOs/FAOs) and their relationship with duration of pregnancy. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded preoperatively and at the time of final followup. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes (FAOS, FAAM, SF-36, SMFA, and VAS pain scores) were obtained at 3, 12 months, and last follow-up (mean 31.9 months). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Data collected included patient demographics (age, laterality, BMI, ASA class, comorbidities), preoperative and postoperative VAS scores, FAOS scores, and imaging. Patients were followed up in clinic for two years following the procedure. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The mean pre-ESWT pain VAS improved from 7.2 +- 1.4 to 2.3 +- 2.1 (p< 0.001) at final follow-up. The FAOS Symptoms, Pain, Function of Daily Living, Function of Sports and Recreational activities and Quality of Life domains improved from 57.7 +- 12.7 to 79.7 +- 13.6 (p< 0.001), from 35 +- 15.8 to 72.6 +- 22 (p< 0.001), from 43.8 +- 15.3 to 81.4 +- 11 (p< 0.001), from 41.2 +- 21.3 to 66.4 +- 18.3 (p< 0.001) and from 33.9 +- 17.4 to 78 +- 24.4 (p< 0.001), respectively. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Self-administered questionnaire data included WOMAC scores, Foot and ankle outcomes scores (FAOS), SF-36 scores and patient satisfaction data. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Patients were followed an average 10.8 years (SD = 4.6, Range 4.6-17) and had standing pre-and post-operative radiographs along with FAOS and PROMIS scores. Radiographs were assessed for talar tilt preoperatively, early postoperatively and at final follow up. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso