“…The aim of this study was to provide clinicians with recommendations for search strategies to efficiently identify relevant CPGs in SUMSearch and Google Scholar. METHODS: We compared the retrieval efficiency (retrieval performance) of search strategies to identify CPGs in SUMSearch and Google Scholar. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The present study aims to appraise the relative proficiency of PubMed and Google Scholar. FINDINGS: Unlike PubMed, Google Scholar does not allow a choice between "Human" and "Animal" studies, nor between "Classical" and other types of studies. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Precision was similar in both databases (PubMed: 6%; Google Scholar: 8%; P=.07). Google Scholar provided significantly greater access to free full-text publications (PubMed: 5%; Google Scholar: 14%; P<.001). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Objective(s): Citation tracking is an important method to analyze the scientific impact of journal articles and can be done through Scopus (SC), Google Scholar (GS), or ISI web of knowledge (WOS). In the current study, we analyzed the citations to 2011-2012 articles of Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences (IJBMS) in these three resources. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Starting from the example of Google Scholar, the authors show that this well established service does not address the current needs, practices, and variety of discovery. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…MATERIAL AND METHODS: The work has an analytical character and presents analysis of the data obtained from the Google Scholar and Scopus database. Results are shown through number of cases, percentage and graphically. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…This indicates a positive and strong correlation between RG variables and Scopus and Google Scholar indicators, while the RG indicators were more correlated with Google Scholar than Scopus. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…BACKGROUND: Previously, we reported on the low recall of Google Scholar (GS) for systematic review (SR) searching. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Of the 752 completed studies the frequency of published results in PubMed, Embase or Google Scholar ranged from 57.9% to 69.7% in the last years. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Following WoS, COCI is the smallest, with 28% of all citations. Google Scholar is still the most comprehensive source. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The H-indexes from Web of Science, Scopus, KoMCI, KoreaMed Synapse, and Google Scholar were 8, 10, 12, 9, and 18, respectively. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…BACKGROUND: The usefulness of Google Scholar (GS) as a bibliographic database for biomedical systematic review (SR) searching is a subject of current interest and debate in research circles. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Particularly, our findings demonstrate why Google Scholar is inappropriate as principal search system. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…A total of 916 articles were returned by both methods and Mastermind averaged four relevant articles per search compared to Google Scholar's three. Of relevant Mastermind articles, 193/308 (62.7%) were unique to it, compared to 87/202, (43.0%) for Google Scholar. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…In addition to PubMed, the first five pages of search results for Google Scholar and Google were considered for inclusion. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The same framework and process was then applied to Google Scholar, specifically for topics that resulted in few PubMed search returns. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The number of academic citations differed significantly by subspecialty on Google Scholar (p < 0.001) and Web of Science (p < 0.001). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…We calculated the Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) to evaluate the correlation between the HSG scores and h-indexes obtained from Google Scholar and Scopus. RESULTS: A total of 286 (31.2%) of the 917 stakeholders had a Google Scholar h-index available. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…However, other combinations of databases yielded corresponding recall rates and are expected to perform comparably. Google Scholar can be a useful supplement to traditional scientific databases to ensure an optimal and comprehensive retrieval of relevant references.…”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…One-hundred and sixty-four reviews with available altmetrics information were included in the final multifactorial analysis, which showed that social media and impact factor have less effect than Mendeley and SCOPUS readers on the number of cites that appear in Google Scholar. Although a journal’s impact factor predicted the number of tweets (OR, 1.202; 95% CI, 1.087–1.049), the years of publication and the number of Mendeley readers predicted the number of citations in Google Scholar (OR, 1.033; 95% CI, 1.018–1.329). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso