-
1por Kashif, Farah, Farooqi, Rabia, Tariq, Shahnila, Nusrat, Aasia, Ashraf, Farzana, Raees, Abdullah“…This paper investigates the language of the last of the three American presidential debates between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump before the 2016 general election. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
2por Weaving, Morgan, Alshaabi, Thayer, Arnold, Michael V., Blake, Khandis, Danforth, Christopher M., Dodds, Peter S., Haslam, Nick, Fine, Cordelia“…We investigated this hypothesis by analyzing Twitter references to Hillary Clinton before, during, and after her presidential campaign. …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3
-
4“…In contrast, this was the case for Hillary Clinton and Martin O’Malley. Overall, small-to-medium sized correlations were found, indicating that far from all conservatives see profoundness in bullshit statements.…”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
5“…Contrary to the expectations of many, Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 U.S. presidential election. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
6“…In Study 2, liberals reading a message opposing Hillary Clinton appealing to fairness values were less supportive of Clinton than liberals in a loyalty-argument condition. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
7por MacInnis, Bo, Miller, Joanne M., Krosnick, Jon A., Below, Clifton, Lindner, Miriam“…In general elections (in 2012 and 2016) for federal offices and the governorship and in primaries (in 2000, 2002, and 2004), evidence of primacy effects appeared in 86% of the 84 tests, including the 2016 presidential race, when Donald Trump gained 1.7 percentage points from first listing, and Hillary Clinton gained 1.5 percentage points. Consistent with theoretical predictions, primacy effects were larger in primaries and for major-party candidates in general elections than for non-major-party candidates in general elections, more pronounced in less publicized contests, and stronger in contests without an incumbent running. …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
8“…The 2016 United States presidential election was exceptional for many reasons; most notably the extreme division between supporters of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. In an election that turned more upon the character traits of the candidates than their policy positions, there is reason to believe that the non-verbal performances of the candidates influenced attitudes toward the candidates. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
9“…Muslims, the LGBTQ+ community, feminists, immigrants) and was a key predictor in reduced affinity for Hillary Clinton and the rise in support for Donald Trump. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
10por Karami, Amir, Lundy, Morgan, Webb, Frank, Turner-McGrievy, Gabrielle, McKeever, Brooke W., McKeever, Robert“…Out of the 48 topics, there was a significant difference (p-value ≤ 0.004) between left and right trolls based on 17 topics. Hillary Clinton’s health during the 2016 election was the most popular topic for right trolls, who discussed this topic significantly more than left trolls. …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
11“…Participants completed a survey evaluating Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump on various personality traits; 72% gave responses favoring a single candidate. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
12“…Fourth, we show that political ideology is a stronger predictor than economic uncertainty of preference for Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election, contradicting previous findings that link Trump's success to economic uncertainty. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
13por Shook, Natalie J., Fitzgerald, Holly N., Boggs, Shelby T., Ford, Cameron G., Hopkins, Patricia D., Silva, Nicole M.“…Thus, we investigated the extent to which each factor (assessed as sexism toward women, Modern Racism, and U.S. nationalism) was uniquely related to evaluations of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, voting intentions, and actual voting behavior. …”
Publicado 2020
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
14“…In Study 3, the index was applied to naturalistic Reddit conversations of 270,784 people in 2 online communities of supporters of the 2016 presidential candidates—Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The index predicted how long people would remain in the group (3a) and revealed temporal shifts mirroring members’ joining and leaving of groups (3b). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
15“…Jared Cohen is the director of Google Ideas and a former adviser to secretaries of state Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton. With their combined knowledge and experiences, the authors are uniquely positioned to take on some of the toughest questions about our future: Who will be more powerful in the future, the citizen or the state? …”
Enlace del recurso
-
16“…As a result, recent research has tended to focus on hyper-partisan (e.g., US politics; Democrat/Republican), person specific (e.g., Hillary Clinton/Donald Trump) content that incorporates emotive and hyperbolic language. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
17“…OBJECTIVE: Assess how mental health changed from before to after the November 2016 election and how trends differed in states that voted for Donald Trump versus Hillary Clinton. DESIGN: Pre- versus post-election study using monthly cross-sectional survey data. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
18“…In all four studies, intention to be vaccinated was positively associated with having voted either for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US presidential elections or for Labour Party candidates in the 2019 UK general election. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
19por Stewart, Patrick A., Eubanks, Austin D., Dye, Reagan G., Gong, Zijian H., Bucy, Erik P., Wicks, Robert H., Eidelman, Scott“…While the presence and intensity of these observable audience responses (OARs) can be expected from partisan primary debates, the amount of not just laughter, but also applause–cheering and booing during the first general election debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump was unprecedented. Such norm-violating audience behavior raises questions concerning not just the presence, strength, and timing of these OAR, but also their influence on those watching on television, streaming video, or listening to radio. …”
Publicado 2018
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
20por Ayers, John W, Althouse, Benjamin M, Poliak, Adam, Leas, Eric C, Nobles, Alicia L, Dredze, Mark, Smith, Davey“…States that had a greater percentage of votes for President Donald Trump during the 2016 election searched more often for police “union(s)” while states favoring Secretary Hillary Clinton searched more for police “training.” CONCLUSIONS: The United States is at a historical juncture, with record interest in topics related to police reform with variability in search terms across states. …”
Publicado 2020
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto