-
21por Ma, Wenchao, Wang, Minshu, Li, Xiaofeng, Huang, Hui, Zhu, Yanjia, Song, Xiuyu, Dai, Dong, Xu, Wengui“…In conclusion, (18)F-FDG PET/CT MTV(PETVCAR), MTV2.5, MTV25%, MTV42% and TLG(PETVCAR) exhibit prognostic values with regard to OS. …”
Publicado 2018
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
22por Gormsen, Lars C., Vendelbo, Mikkel H., Pedersen, Mette Abildgaard, Haraldsen, Ate, Hjorthaug, Karin, Bogsrud, Trond Velde, Petersen, Lars J., Jensen, Karen Juul, Brøndum, Rasmus, El-Galaly, Tarec C.“…Quantitative analyses were performed using Hermes TumourFinder® to obtain MTV(2.5) (SUV 2.5 cut-off) and MTV(41) (41% SUVmax isocontour cut-off). …”
Publicado 2019
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
23por Wajjwalku, Worawidh, Takahashi, Masahide, Miyaishi, Osamu, Lu, Jin, Sakata, Keita, Yokoi, Toyoharu, Saga, Shinsuke, Imai, Masao, Matsuyama, Mutsushi, Hoshino, Munemitsu“…When we examined the presence of Mtv‐1 and 2 proviruses, which are known to be responsible for MMTV expression, in the genomes of the II‐TES, I‐TES, CS and DBA/2 strains by Southern blotting, Mtv‐2 was not found in any of the mice and Mtv‐1 was found in the II‐TES and DBA/2 mice but not in the I‐TES and CS mice. …”
Publicado 1991
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
24por Kim, Bo Hyun, Kim, Seong-Jang, Kim, Keunyoung, Kim, Heeyoung, Kim, So Jung, Kim, Won Jin, Jeon, Yun Kyung, Kim, Sang Soo, Kim, Yong Ki, Kim, In Joo“…When SUV(max) > 5.91, MTV2.5 > 2.05 cm(3), and TLG2.5 > 9.09 were used as cutoff points, sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) for prediction of lateral LNM were 77.9, 69.1 %, 0.716 (P = 0.047), 77.8, 88.1 %, 0.839 (P < 0.001), 77.8, 85.1 %, and 0.815 (P = 0.002), respectively. …”
Publicado 2015
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
25por Chong, Jae Uk, Hwang, Ho Kyoung, Lee, Jin Ho, Yun, Mijin, Kang, Chang Moo, Lee, Woo Jung“…There was a significant difference between aK-type and aNon K-type pancreatic cancer (tumor size (P = 0.030), adjusted CA 19–9 (P = 0.007), maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max),P<0.001), metabolic tumor volume (MTV(2.5), P<0.001), total lesion glycolysis (TLG, P<0.001)). …”
Publicado 2017
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
26por Shimizu, Takahiro, Kim, Mai, Palangka, Citra R.A.P., Seki-Soda, Mai, Ogawa, Masaru, Takayama, Yu, Yokoo, Satoshi“…The present study showed that MTV (≥2.9 cm(3)) was an independent diagnostic and predictive factor for positivity of mandibular invasion. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
27por Shi, Huazheng, Yuan, Zuguo, Yuan, Zheng, Yang, Chunshan, Zhang, Jian, Shou, Yi, Zhang, Wenrui, Ping, Zhaofu, Gao, Xin, Liu, Shiyuan“…AUC (TLG 4.0) was significantly larger than AUC (SUVmean), AUC (MTV 2.5), AUC (MTV 3.0), AUC (MTV 3.5), AUC (TLG 2.5), and AUC (TLG 3.0), respectively (all, p < 0.05). …”
Publicado 2018
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
28por Yang, Jing, Zhu, Sha, Pang, Fuwen, Xu, Miao, Dong, Yiting, Hao, Jianqi, Ma, Xuelei“…In addition, mean MTV 42% was 18.4 and varied between 1.3 and 61.6; mean MTV 2.5 was 34.7 and varied significantly between 1.6 and 141.9. …”
Publicado 2018
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
29“…Two different methods were employed for defining the threshold SUV to delineate MTV: 1) SUV of 2.5 (designated as MTV); 2) a fixed ratio including 40% (MTV40), 50% (MTV50) and 60% (MTV60) of SUVmax. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
30por Gu, Bingxin, Zhang, Jianping, Ma, Guang, Song, Shaoli, Shi, Liqun, Zhang, Yingjian, Yang, Zhongyi“…RESULTS: For the primary tumor, MTV-2.5, TLG-2.5, MTV-70%, and TLG-70% were significantly correlated with PFS. …”
Publicado 2020
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
31por Harder, Felix N., Jungmann, Friederike, Kaissis, Georgios A., Lohöfer, Fabian K., Ziegelmayer, Sebastian, Havel, Daniel, Quante, Michael, Reichert, Maximillian, Schmid, Roland M., Demir, Ihsan Ekin, Friess, Helmut, Wildgruber, Moritz, Siveke, Jens, Muckenhuber, Alexander, Steiger, Katja, Weichert, Wilko, Rauscher, Isabel, Eiber, Matthias, Makowski, Marcus R., Braren, Rickmer F.“…Response per RECIST1.1 was then assessed at 3 months [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI-derived parameters (MTV(50%), TLG(50%), MTV(2.5), TLG(2.5), SUV(max), SUV(peak), ADC(max), ADC(mean) and ADC(min)) were assessed, using multiple t-test, Man–Whitney-U test and Fisher’s exact test for binary features. …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
32por Liu, Xin, Zhang, Yi-Fan, Shi, Qin, Yang, Yi, Yao, Ben-Hu, Wang, Shi-Cun, Geng, Guang-Yong“…RESULTS: Regional lymph node status (P < 0.001), nerve invasion (P = 0.036), tumor thrombus (P = 0.005), and HI-1 (P = 0.010) exhibited significant differences between the relapse and non-relapse groups, while SUVmax, MTV2.5, MTV40%, TLG2.5, TLG40%, CV2.5, CV40%, HI-2, and other clinicopathological factors had no differences between the relapse and non-relapse groups. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
33“…The parameters were named as SUVmax1,MTV1,TLG1,SUVmax2,MTV2,TLG2,△SUV(max),△MTV and △TLG. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the relationship between metabolic parameters and OS, survival analysis was carried out by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
34por Vlachopoulos, Charalambos V., Koutagiar, Iosif P., Georgakopoulos, Alexandros T., Pouli, Anastasia G., Sioni, Anastasia Κ., Giannouli, Stavroula Ε., Chondropoulos, Spiros D., Stergiou, Ioanna Ε., Solomou, Eirini G., Terentes-Printzios, Dimitrios G., Karakitsios, Ioannis G., Kafouris, Pavlos P., Gaitanis, Anastasios, Pianou, Nikoletta K., Petrocheilou, Aikaterini, Aggeli, Constantina I., Stroumpouli, Euaggelia, Marinakis, Theodoros P., Voulgarelis, Michael, Tousoulis, Dimitrios M., Anagnostopoulos, Constantinos D.“…In multivariable analysis, aortic FDG uptake and MTV(≥2.5) values were independently associated (β = 0.425; 95% CI: 0.189 to 0.662; p = 0.001; R(2) = 0.208), as were aortic FDG uptake and MTV(≥41%) (β = 0.407; 95% CI: 0.167 to 0.649, p = 0.001; R(2) = 0.191). …”
Publicado 2020
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto