Materias dentro de su búsqueda.
Mostrando 1,601 - 1,620 Resultados de 35,324 Para Buscar '"Nevers"', tiempo de consulta: 3.53s Limitar resultados
  1. 1601
    “…Results: In the 71 non-squamous NSCLC patients, 30 (42.3%) were never-/former light smokers and 41 (57.7%) were current smokers. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Current Smoking has a Detrimental Effect on Survival for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) negative Advanced non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Treated with Pemetrexed Continuation Maintenance
  2. 1602
    “…RESULTS: Baseline prevalence of never, former and current smokers was 41.3, 34.3 and 24.3%, respectively. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    A 10-year observational study on the trends and determinants of smoking status
  3. 1603
    “…This prognostic association differed according to smoking status (p for interaction = 0.049, between never-smoking and ever-smoking patients). The association between high expression levels of CSF1R and lung cancer-specific mortality was stronger in never-smoking patients (log-rank p = 0.0027; HR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.41−6.11, p = 0.0041) than in ever-smoking patients (log-rank p = 0.73; HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.59−2.00, p = 0.73). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    CSF1R-Expressing Tumor-Associated Macrophages, Smoking and Survival in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Analyses Using Quantitative Phosphor-Integrated Dot Staining
  4. 1604
    “…Distinct pathways were altered in lung carcinogenesis in ever-smokers and never-smokers. Never-smoker patients had a better outcome than ever-smoker patients. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Smoker and non-smoker lung adenocarcinoma is characterized by distinct tumor immune microenvironments
  5. 1605
    “…Never smokers had decreased risk of Alzheimer's disease (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70–0.96) compared to continual smokers. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Effect of smoking cessation on the risk of dementia: a longitudinal study
  6. 1606
    “…Marital status was defined as married versus never married, divorced and widowed. The relationship between marital status and the four above mentioned outcomes were investigated using Cox regression models adjusted for the main confounders, specific to each outcome. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Associations of marital status with diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: A long term follow-up study
  7. 1607
    “…Of those not on a statin, 894 (59.2%) reported never being offered a statin, 153 (10.1%) declined a statin, and 464 (30.7%) had discontinued therapy. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Patient‐Reported Reasons for Declining or Discontinuing Statin Therapy: Insights From the PALM Registry
  8. 1608
    “…Significant proteins were then studied in relation to incidence of CVD (i.e., coronary events or ischemic stroke) in never smokers. RESULTS: Fifteen proteins were associated with B-Cd in never smokers. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Biomarkers of blood cadmium and incidence of cardiovascular events in non-smokers: results from a population-based proteomics study
  9. 1609
    “…The difference in knowledge scores was evident among ‘never users’ of tobacco before and after the awareness programmes (p<0.0001). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Effectiveness of School based Awareness Programmes against Tobacco among Users and Non- Users– A Cross- Sectional Study from Rural Kerala, India
  10. 1610
    “…Cumulative average of processed meat intake (every 4 years) was divided into never/almost never, < 1 or ≥ 1 servings/week. A score was created to study the impact of 3-risk lifestyle factors. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Processed Meat Intake and Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease among Middle-aged Women
  11. 1611
    “…CONCLUSIONS: In esophageal adenocarcinoma patients, cigarette smoking or alcohol consumption was not associated with a significant difference in survival in comparison with never smokers and never drinkers in fully adjusted analysis. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Alcohol intake, tobacco smoking, and esophageal adenocarcinoma survival: a molecular pathology epidemiology cohort study
  12. 1612
    “…RESULTS: Among a total of 500 patients, around 66.4% were never smokers, 23.6% were current smokers, and 10.0% were ex-smokers. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Smoking behavior, knowledge, attitude, and practice among patients attending primary healthcare clinics in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  13. 1613
    “…However, at any given age, female smokers are at higher risk of AAA than male never‐smokers, and a policy of screening male never‐smokers but not higher‐risk female smokers is questionable.…”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Sex‐Specific Associations of Vascular Risk Factors With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Findings From 1.5 Million Women and 0.8 Million Men in the United States and United Kingdom
  14. 1614
    “…Results: From the 5,021 American youth who were never smokers at baseline (2013), 89.4% continued as never smokers, and 10.6% became ever-smokers. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Parent Education and Future Transition to Cigarette Smoking: Latinos' Diminished Returns
  15. 1615
    “…We categorized the participants into three groups as follows: never smoker, <20 pack-years (PY) smokers, and ≥20 PY smokers. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    The Attributable Risk of Smoking on All-Cause Mortality in Korean: A Study Using KNHANES IV–VI (2007–2015) with Mortality Data
  16. 1616
    “…Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare tobacco use groups with never- smokers on beliefs, controlling for potential confounders. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    COVID-19 and beliefs about tobacco use: an online cross-sectional study in Iran
  17. 1617
    “…Generally, there were no statistically significant associations between reasons why smokers never tried e-cigarettes and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Reasons why Chinese smokers prefer not to use electronic cigarettes
  18. 1618
    “…“Occasionally used” compared to “Never used” odds ratio was 0.5227 (95% confidence interval (CI); 0.3053-0.9009 p = 0.0184) and “Very often used” compared to “Never used” odds ratio was 0.5033 (95% CI; 0.2892-0.8799 p = 0.0152). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Salt Consumption and Myocardial Infarction: Is Limited Salt Intake Beneficial?
  19. 1619
    “…Neither systolic BP, nor diastolic BP differed between Black consistent smokers compared with Black never smokers, although Black consistent smokers had higher PP than Black never smokers (β=1.01 mm Hg, P=0.028). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Cigarette Smoking and Longitudinal Associations With Blood Pressure: The CARDIA Study
  20. 1620
    “…RESULTS: The 6M group (51.9%) received curative therapy more often than the other groups (1Y, 48.3%; 2Y, 43.8%; 3Y, 41.3%; never screened, 34.5%). Odds ratio for receiving curative therapy among the other surveillance interval groups (1Y, 0.87; 2Y, 0.76; 3Y, 0.77; never screened, 0.57; p<0.001) were significantly lower than that of the 6M group. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Effectiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and an Optimal Surveillance Interval: Nationwide Cohort of Korea
Herramientas de búsqueda: RSS