“…METHODS: QoL was measured with RAND-36 questionnaires every 12 weeks. The primary objective was to estimate differences in changes from baseline between intermittent and continuous treatment. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Outcome scores were obtained in a proportion of the cohort, including the modified Harris Hip Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, patient satisfaction score, and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) score. All patients had achieved a minimum of 1 year of follow-up at the time of assessment. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…At long-term follow-up, HRQoL was measured with the RAND-12 questionnaire, and QoL was measured with two questions from the “Study on European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions”. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…HRQoL was measured using the Finnish RAND 36-item health survey. Cardiorespiratory fitness was determined by a bicycle ergometer test, and muscular fitness by various tests measuring maximal strength and muscular endurance. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Visual function was assessed by high‐ (HC‐VA) and low‐contrast visual acuity (LC‐VA) and the Hardy‐Rand‐Rittler pseudoisochromatic test for color vision. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…HRQoL was assessed using RAND 36-item Health Survey at baseline and follow-up 10 years later. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Clinical analysis was conducted using various pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome questionnaires, including the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Foot Function Index–Revised (FFI-R), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, as well as subjective patient satisfaction. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Kenneth Kaunda and West Rand (WR) health districts. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Each cultural trait has three indices with five items, giving a total of 45 items. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Measurements were self-reported at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months: fatigue, using the Fatigue Severity Scale (range = 0–7, 7 = worst, ≥5 = severe); vitality, using the RAND 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36, range = 0–100, 100 = best); sleep, using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (range = 0–21, 21 = worst, >5 = poor quality); mood, using the General Health Questionnaire 12 (range = 0–36, 36 = worst); and general health, using the EUROQoL (range = 0–100, 100 = best). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…HRQoL was evaluated before, and at 6 months and 2 years after gastric bypass surgery, using the RAND- 36-item health survey. At 2 years, interviews for in-depth analysis of HRQoL changes were performed. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…METHODS: Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature—a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12), Marx Activity, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation data were collected. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…METHODS: The study included prospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery in five Dutch hospitals. The RAND-36 questionnaire was used to measure the patient’s QoL; preoperatively and twelve months postoperatively. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…We defined decline in HRQOL as a decrease in Mental Component Summary (MCS) or Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 administered at two time points – at the time of adherence assessment and 1 year later) equivalent to the minimal important difference (MID) for each respective summary score, calculated as the average of MID estimates derived from distribution and anchor-based approaches. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…HR-QoL was assessed using the RAND-12 Health Status Inventory questionnaire at baseline (T0: 3–6 weeks before discharge) and at 14 (T1), 33 (T2) and 52 (T3) weeks after discharge from rehabilitation. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…NAR group reported lower KOOS, JR scores at 3 months and 1 year (preop: 45.30 vs 45.79, P = .728; 3 months: 64.73 vs 59.47, P < .001; 1 year: 71.66 vs 69.56, P = .234); however, only 3-month scores statistically differed. Veterans RAND-12 Physical and Mental components scores (VR-12 PCS and MCS) were not statistically significant at any time-point between the cohorts. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Potential key QIs were retrieved from the search and then evaluated by a multidisciplinary expert panel using a RAND-modified Delphi procedure comprising two online surveys and a face-to-face meeting. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…MATERIAL AND METHODS: This exploratory longitudinal, prospective study measured the course of informal caregiver burden (Self-Perceived Pressure of Informal Care), distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), health-related quality of life (RAND-36), marital satisfaction (Maudsley Marital Questionnaire), social support (Social Support List – Discrepancies), fatigue (Abbreviated Fatigue Questionnaire), and self-esteem (Caregiver Reaction Assessment) before (T0), during (T1), and after (T2) patients’ treatment. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The Patient-Generated Index (PGI) (an individualized HRQoL measure) and the RAND-36 (to obtain SF-6D scores; a GPBM) were administered. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The congruence among typing methods was calculated by Rand’s and Wallace coefficients. RESULTS: P-640 among RAPD primers and Ribo-2 among ribotyping primers were more informative as they gave high strain diversity, the highest number of clusters, and highest discriminatory power (ISD=70.45%, 29 clusters at 70% cutoff, DI=0.97 and ISD=75%, 25 clusters at 70% cutoff DI=0.969, respectively). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso