-
61por Fitzallen, Grace C., Griffin, Alison, Taylor, H. Gerry, Kirby, James N., Liley, Helen G., Bora, Samudragupta“…Finally, those in the school-age (RRR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.32–2.14; RRR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.21–3.13), early adolescence (RRR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.38–2.48; RRR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.53–4.44) and late adolescence (RRR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.38–3.19; RRR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.02–5.08) periods were more likely than those in the preschool period to be categorized in the moderate and high expression profiles, respectively. …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
62“…Democratic countries had higher chances of providing threat statistics on subpages, including daily new cases (Relative Risk Ratio, RRR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.16–2.37), mortalities (RRR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.23–2.33), hospitalizations (RRR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.12–2.37), and positivity rates (RRR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.07–2.23). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
63“…This study was done to evaluate respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) related readmission (RRR) and risk factors of RRR in preterm infants < 34 weeks gestational age (GA) within 1 yr following discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
64por Abdullahi, Ifrah, Wong, Kingsley, Glasson, Emma, Mutch, Raewyn, de Klerk, Nicholas, Downs, Jenny, Cherian, Sarah, Leonard, Helen“…During the period from 1997 to 2010 they were also at some risk of extreme preterm (aRRR 1.42, 95% CI 0.98, 2.04) very early preterm (aRRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11, 1.62) and post term birth (aRRR 1.93, 95% CI 0.99, 3.78). …”
Publicado 2019
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
65por Navarrete-Muñoz, Eva María, Valera-Gran, Desirée, García de la Hera, Manoli, Gimenez-Monzo, Daniel, Morales, Eva, Julvez, Jordi, Riaño, Isolina, Tardón, Adonina, Ibarluzea, Jesus, Santa-Marina, Loreto, Murcia, Mario, Rebagliato, Marisa, Vioque, Jesus“…In the first period, tobacco smoking (RRR=1.63), alcohol intake (RRR=1.40), multiparous (RRR=1.44), unplanned pregnancy (RRR=4.20) and previous spontaneous abortion (RRR=0.58, lower use of high FAS dosages among those with previous abortions) were significantly associated with low FAS dosages. …”
Publicado 2015
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
66“…Consuming methadone/buprenorphine was a protective factor for men reporting poor QoL (RRR 0.5, 0.3–0.9) and very poor QoL (RRR 0.4, 0.2–0.9), as well as for women reporting very poor QoL (RRR 0.2, 0.0–0.6). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
67“…RESULTS: Higher risk of underweight was found in age group 15–19 (RRR 3.08, 95% CI: 2.29–4.15), 20–29 (RRR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.29–2.08) and in lowest (RRR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.03–2.47) and second wealth quintiles (RRR 1.77 (95% CI: 1.18–2.64). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
68“…Based on the final multivariable multinomial model, only being overweight (Relative Risk Ratio [RRR] = 1.85, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] = 1.41, 2.42), obese (RRR = 3.41, 95% CI = 2.61, 4.45), hypertensive (RRR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.33, 2.15), hypercholesterolemic (RRR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.55, 2.43), and arthritic (RRR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.55) had significant associations with pre-diabetes. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
69por Gómez-Acebo, Inés, Dierssen-Sotos, Trinidad, Mirones, Mónica, Pérez-Gómez, Beatriz, Guevara, Marcela, Amiano, Pilar, Sala, Maria, Molina, Antonio J., Alonso-Molero, Jéssica, Moreno, Victor, Suarez-Calleja, Claudia, Molina-Barceló, Ana, Alguacil, Juan, Marcos-Gragera, Rafael, Fernández-Ortiz, María, Sanz-Guadarrama, Oscar, Castaño-Vinyals, Gemma, Gil-Majuelo, Leire, Moreno-Iribas, Conchi, Aragonés, Nuria, Kogevinas, Manolis, Pollán, Marina, Llorca, Javier“…Patients treated less than what was recommended in St Gallen had cancers in stage 0 (RRR = 21.6, 7.2–64.5), poorly differentiated (RRR = 1.9, 1.2–2.9), HER2 positive (RRR = 3.4, 2.4–4.9) and luminal B-like subtype (RRR = 3.6, 2.6–5.1). …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
70“…We found that parental discussion around school performance (relative risk ratio [RRR]: 1.33), friendship (RRR: 1.37) and personal matters (RRR: 1.29) were positively associated with remaining unmarried relative to early marriage of girls. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
71“…Background characteristics positively associated with vaccination status included delivery in a health facility (RRR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.9–3.3), maternal age of 30–39 years (RRR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.2–4.1), attending at least four visits for antenatal care (RRR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.7–4.5), health facility visit in the past 12 months (RRR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4–2.5), paternal professional occupation (RRR = 4.9, 95% CI = 2.0–12.3), family with richer wealth index (RRR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.4–4.1), and living in the northeast region (RRR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.2–3.9)were positively associated with vaccination status. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
72por Vina, E. R., Hannon, M. J., Quinones, C., Hausmann, L. R. M., Ibrahim, S. A., Dagnino, J., Kwoh, C. K.“…The following were associated with prescription NSAID use instead of no NSAID use: having family/friends who used prescription (relative risk ratio [RRR] 3.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.05‐7.47) and over‐the‐counter (OTC) (RRR 3.10; 95% CI 1.65‐5.83) NSAIDs for OA, understanding the consequences of using both prescription (RRR 3.50; 95% CI 1.79‐6.86) and OTC (RRR 2.80; 95% CI 1.39‐5.65) NSAIDs, higher perceived benefit of both prescription (RRR 2.51; 95% CI 1.71‐3.66) and OTC (RRR 1.44; 95% CI 1.01‐2.06) NSAIDs, and lower perceived risk of both types of NSAIDs (prescription: RRR 0.63 [95% CI 0.46‐0.87]; OTC: RRR 0.53 [95% CI 0.37‐0.75]). …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
73por Lee, Juhan, Tan, Andy S.L., Porter, Lauren, Young-Wolff, Kelly C., Carter-Harris, Lisa, Salloum, Ramzi G.“…Once jointly analyzed, daily use of Instagram was significantly associated with increased relative risks of experimental (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR] = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.38–2.25) and current vaping (aRRR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.16–1.95); nondaily use of Snapchat was significantly associated with increased relative risk of experimental (aRRR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.17–2.10) and current vaping (aRRR = 1.87; 95% CI, 1.31–2.66); daily use of Snapchat was associated with increased relative risk of experimental (aRRR = 2.38; 95% CI, 1.85–3.08) and current vaping (aRRR = 5.09; 95% CI, 3.78–6.86); nondaily use of Facebook was associated with increased relative risk of current vaping (aRRR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.00–1.43), and nondaily use of Twitter was associated with increased relative risk of current vaping (aRRR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07–1.56). …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
74por Mengesha, Hayelom Gebrekirstos, Wuneh, Alem Desta, Weldearegawi, Berhe, Selvakumar, Divya L.“…The predictors for low birth weight were: early marriage (<18 year) (RRR: 0.59, CI: 0.35–0.97); rural residence (RRR: 0.53, CI: 0.32–0.9); prematurity (RRR: 15.4, CI: 9.18–25.9); no antenatal follow-up (RRR: 6.78, CI: 2.39–19.25); and female sex (RRR: 1.77, CI: 1.13–2.77). …”
Publicado 2017
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
75Epidemiology of pre-cancerous cervical lesion and risk factors among adult women in Tigray, Ethiopiapor Abera, Gerezgiher B., Yebyo, Henock G., Hailekiros, Haftamu, Niguse, Selam, Berhe, Yibrah, Gigar, Goitom, Asmelash, Tsehaye, Goba, Gelila“…We used relative risk ratio (rrr) to estimate the strength of association. Divorced or widowed women had 2.5 and 4.7 times more risk of being positive and suspicious respectively, compared to single women (rrr = 2.5, 95% CI [1.13, 5.52]); (rrr = 4.69, 95% CI [1.00, 21.84]). …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
76por Yamazaki, Tatsuro, Saito, Yuichi, Yamashita, Daichi, Kitahara, Hideki, Kobayashi, Yoshio“…RRR and MRR may be useful to identify patients with CMD.…”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
77por Takahashi, Kohei, Morimura, Naoto, Takeuchi, Ichiro, Abe, Takeru, Toida, Chiaki, Hattori, Jun, Hattori, Kyoko, Honda, Hideki, Uchiyama, Munehito, Matsuda, Kiyoshi, Nakagawa, Yoshihide, Asari, Yasushi“…AIM: This study examines the use of the medical risk/resource ratio (RRR) and need for medical resources (NMR) as new indicators of the imbalance in medical demand and supply in disasters. …”
Publicado 2018
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
78por AlSheikh, Hana Al, AlZain, Sahar, Shaik, Jilani P., Bhogoju, Sarayu, Warsy, Arjumand, Reddy Parine, Narasimha“…“Residual ridge resorption” (RRR) is a multifactorial condition involving bone resorption of the residual ridge. …”
Publicado 2020
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
79por Teshale, Achamyeleh Birhanu, Wang, Vicky Qi, Biney, Godness Kye, Ameyaw, Edward Kwabena, Adjei, Nicholas Kofi, Yaya, Sanni“…RESULTS: Women who had one son and two daughters (aRRR = 0.85, CI = 0.75, 0.95), two sons and one daughter (aRRR = 0.81 CI = 0.72, 0.92), one son and three daughters (aRRR = 0.66, CI = 0.54, 0.80), two sons and two daughters (aRRR = 0.59, CI = 0.50, 0.69), and three or more sons (aRRR = 0.75, CI = 0.63, 0.91) were less likely to use temporary modern contraceptive methods. …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
80“…The intervention’s true relative risk reduction (RRR) was also randomized, and assumed 1% of drugs have a warfarin-like effect (60% RRR), 5% a statin-like effect (35% RRR), 39% an ASA-like effect (15% RRR), 50% no effect (0% RRR), and that 5% would cause harm (modelled as a 20% relative risk increase). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto