“…METHODS: The investigation comprised three phases: 1) original tool generation, 2) tool revision, 3) reliability analysis (i.e., interrater, test-retest) and validity analysis (i.e., content, criterion). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Of the 5 stemmed TKAs requiring revision, 3 were for aseptic loosening and 2 were for PPJI. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…There were no differences between allograft and graftless patients regarding rates of loss of reduction >5 mm (11.1% graftless vs 21.2% allograft), revision (3.2% vs 1.9%), infection (1.6% vs 3.9%), fracture (3.2% vs 7.7%), or total complication (7.9% vs 9.6%) rates (all P > .05). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Of the 14 items selected from two previous proposals for scale revision, 3 had a weak correlation with the whole scale and were deleted. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Overall poor screw placement rate was 2.8% (prone, 2.7%; lateral, 3.8%; primary, 2.7%; revision, 3.5%). Overall proximal facet and endplate violation rates were 0.4% and 0.9%. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Their risk of intraoperative complications was similar to that for reference patients (2.5% vs. 2.0%), but they had greater risk of dying during hospitalization or within 30 days of discharge (1.4% vs. 0.4%; aOR = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.5–10); greater risk of postoperative transfer to an intensive care unit (0.6% vs. 0.06%; aOR = 5.8, CI: 1.3–25) or a medical department (4.4% vs. 2.5%; aOR = 1.7, CI: 0.99–2.9); greater risk of readmission within 30 days of discharge (15% vs. 8%; aOR = 1.8, CI: 1.3–2.4); and greater risk of deep prosthetic infection (3.1% vs. 1.4%) or revision (3.7% vs. 1.7%) within 1 year. The chance of having an uncomplicated procedure was 81.0% (CI: 76.6–85.0) for cirrhosis patients and 90.0% (CI: 89.6–90.0) for reference patients. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The most frequent classification of secondary surgical procedures was reoperation (48/103) and removal (47/103). Revision (3/103) and supplementary fixation (2/103) were rare. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…MoM had higher 2–7 and 7–13 years’ adjusted HRs of revision (3.6, CI 2.3–5.7 and 4.1, CI 1.7–10). MoXLP, CoC, and CoXLP had similar HRs in all 3 periods. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Four-year follow-up complication (6.1%) and revision (3.6%) rates after primary TKR appeared to be lower than after secondary TKR (complication rate 20–48%, revision rate 8–20%) but higher than after elective primary TKR. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…At all assessment points, the Disturbance of Attachment Interview (DAI; Smyke and Zeanah in Disturbances of attachment interview, Tulane University, New Orleans, 1999) and the Attachment Q-sort (AQS; Waters and Deane in Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 50:41–65, 1985 German version as reported (Schölmerich and Leyendecker in Deutsche Übersetzung des attachment behavior Q-Set, revision 3.2. Unpublished manual, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, 1999) were used to investigate the interplay between disorder symptoms and attachment security. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Compared to the OA, the osteonecrosis cohort had higher crude incidence of 90-day mortality (0.7% vs. 0.3%), SSI (1.2% vs. 0.8%), unplanned readmission (9.6% vs. 5.2%) and revision (3.1% vs. 2.4%). After multivariable-adjustment, patients with osteonecrosis had a higher odds/hazard of mortality (OR: 2.48; 95% CI:1.31–4.72), SSI (OR: 1.67, 95%CI:1.11–2.51), unplanned 90-day readmissions (OR: 2.20; 95% CI:1.67–2.91) and a trend towards higher revision rate 1-year post-THA (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.94–1.84), than OA patients. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Change in PROMIS PI was significantly greater in primary (–12.3) vs revision (–3.7) surgery (P = .0157). Change in PROMIS PF was greater in primary (+6.0) vs revision surgery (+2.3) but did not reach statistical significance. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Change in PROMIS PI was significantly greater in primary (-12.3) versus revision (-3.7) surgery (p=0.0157). Change in PROMIS PF was non- significantly greater in primary (+4.0) versus revision surgery (+2.3). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Within 90 days postoperatively, there were 17 unplanned ED/clinic visits (13.4%), 7 hospital readmissions (5.5%), and 4 complications requiring revision (3.1%). Factors predictive of unplanned overnight stay included age above 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 36.80 [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.20-615.49]; P = .012), tobacco use (OR, 12.90 [95% CI, 1.23-135.31]; P = .033), and American Society of Anesthesiologists status of 3 (OR, 13.84 [95% CI, 1.22-156.57]; P = .034). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…</b> This fully updated and revised 3rd edition addresses the entire field of mechanical vibration and shock as one of the most important types of load and stress applied to structures, machines and components in the real world. …”
Enlace del recurso

“…The basic theory is developed systematically, exploring in detail the solution methods to all important problems.   The thoroughly revised 3rd edition includes an introduction to the numerical solution of Finite Elements. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…A total of 46 photographs demonstrated CV; 26 demonstrated CV after revisions; 3 did not demonstrate CV after revisions. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…By laparoscopic surgery approach, the entire bowel was carefully revised, 3 intussusceptions and bowel volvulus were found, 2 in jejunum and 1 in ileum, causing incomplete obstruction and intestinal dilatation, with a diameter of 6 cm. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…A number of studies on GERD were subsequently conducted in Japan and abroad, and vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), became available for the first time in Japan in February 2015. The revised 3rd edition (Japanese edition), which incorporates new findings and information, was published in April 2021. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Patellar tilt improvement was superior when a robotic device was used (either image-based or image-free) compared to the conventional technique. There were three revisions (3.9%) at the last follow-up related to femorotibial osteoarthritis progression. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso