Mostrando 1 - 20 Resultados de 49 Para Buscar '"Revision3"', tiempo de consulta: 0.72s Limitar resultados
  1. 1
    por Keil, E
    Publicado 1967
    Enlace del recurso
    ISR parameter list (revision 3)
  2. 2
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Use of EFSA Pesticide Residue Intake Model (EFSA PRIMo revision 3)
  3. 3
    Publicado 2021
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Scientific and technical guidance for the preparation and presentation of a health claim application (Revision 3)
  4. 4
    por Muños López, Edgar Iván
    Publicado 2012
    Tesis Electrónico eBook
    Hallazgos abdominales ultrasonograficos en pacientes con dengue del Hospital Regional de Veracruz revisíon 3 meses : /
  5. 5
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    The in vivo location of edge-wear in hip arthroplasties: combining pre-revision 3D CT imaging with retrieval analysis
  6. 6
    “…The Panel on Food additives and Flavourings of the EFSA was requested to update Flavouring Group Evaluation 13 using the Procedure as outlined in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000, to include an evaluation of the flavouring substances 2‐ethyl‐5‐methylfuran [FL‐no: 13.125] and 2‐octylfuran [FL‐no: 13.162]. FGE.13 revision 3 (FGE.13Rev3) deals with 26 flavourings substances of which 24 have been already evaluated to be of no safety concern. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 13 Revision 3 (FGE.13Rev3): furfuryl and furan derivatives with and without additional side‐chain substituents and heteroatoms from chemical group 14
  7. 7
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Flavouring Group Evaluation 217 Revision 3 (FGE.217Rev3): consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 4.1 of FGE.19: lactones
  8. 8
    “…The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of 5 flavouring substances in Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3). In FGE.210, the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids concluded that the genotoxic potential could not be ruled out for any of the flavouring substances. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19
  9. 9
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 67, Revision 3 (FGE.67Rev3): consideration of 23 furan‐substituted compounds evaluated by JECFA at the 55th, 65th, 69th and 86th meetings
  10. 10
    “…The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of flavouring substances from subgroup 2.2 of FGE.19 in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 208 Revision 3 (FGE.208Rev3). In FGE.208Rev1, the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) evaluated genotoxicity studies on the representative substance p‐mentha‐1,8‐dien‐7‐al [FL‐no: 05.117], which was found to be genotoxic in vivo. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 208 Revision 3 (FGE.208Rev3): consideration of genotoxicity data on alicyclic aldehydes with α,β‐unsaturation in ring/side‐chain and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.2 of FGE.19
  11. 11
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 77, revision 3 (FGE.77Rev3): consideration of pyridine, pyrrole and quinoline derivatives evaluated by JECFA (63rd meeting) structurally related to pyridine, pyrrole, indole and quinoline derivatives evaluated by EFSA in FGE.24Rev2
  12. 12
    “…With regard to the remaining five flavouring substances considered in this revision 3 of FGE.91: two ([FL‐no: 12.065 and 12.079]) have been cleared with respect to genotoxicity in FGE.201Rev2; two ([FL‐no: 12.169 and 12.241]) were originally allocated to FGE.74Rev4 and one ([FL‐no: 12.304]) to FGE.08Rev5. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 91, Revision 3 (FGE.91Rev3): consideration of aliphatic, aromatic and α,β‐unsaturated sulfides and thiols evaluated by JECFA (53rd, 61st, 68th and 76th meetings), structurally related to substances in FGE.08Rev5
  13. 13
    “…The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate 54 flavouring substances attributed to the Flavouring Group Evaluation 05 (FGE.05), using the Procedure as referred to in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. This Revision 3 includes 17 additional substances which have been cleared with respect to genotoxicity in FGE.200Rev1 ([FL‐no: 02.192, 02.231, 05.072, 05.144, 05.184, 05.189, 05.190, 05.191, 05.195, 09.247, 09.400, 09.866, 09.948]) and in FGE.203Rev2 ([FL‐no: 05.081, 05.186, 05.194, 05.196]). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 5, Revision 3 (FGE.05Rev3): Branched‐ and straight‐chain unsaturated aldehydes, dienals, unsaturated and saturated carboxylic acids and related esters with saturated and unsaturated aliphatic alcohols and a phenylacetic acid related ester from chemical groups 1, 2, 3, 5 and 15
  14. 14
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 63, Revision 3 (FGE.63Rev3): aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (59th and 69th meetings) structurally related to saturated and unsaturated aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and esters of secondary alcohols and saturated linear or branched‐chain carboxylic acids evaluated by EFSA in FGE.07Rev4
  15. 15
    “…METHODS: This study involved 53 retrieved TKA implants with pre-revision 3D-CT scans used to determine coronal (varus–valgus), sagittal (tibial slope) and rotational (internal rotation–external rotation) TKA orientation as well as tibiofemoral leg axis. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    3D patient imaging and retrieval analysis help understand the clinical importance of rotation in knee replacements
  16. 16
    Publicado 2006
    “…SEIL (GB), the second lowest bidder, for PC server systems providing at least 1 136 kSPECint2000, for an amount of 463 236 Pounds Sterling (1 044 600 Swiss francs), not subject to revision; 3. E4 (IT), the third lowest bidder, for PC server systems providing at least 1 133 kSPECint2000, for an amount of 648 854 euros (1 012 727 Swiss francs), not subject to revision. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Proposal for the award of three contracts for the supply of PC server systems for physics data processing
  17. 17
    “…Complications varied among studies ranging from 1% to 10% and included pseudoarthrosis (9%), nonunion and revision (3%) and screw removal (1%). Conclusion: There is low evidence suggesting that patients with axial neck pain without radicular or myelopathic symptoms may receive some improvement in pain and function following ACDF. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the management of axial neck pain in the absence of radiculopathy or myelopathy
  18. 18
    “…RESULTS: Complication rates and revision rates were as follows: skin infection 0.99%, skin necrosis 0.99%, and secondary revision 3.48%. Finally 79.60% of patients had a decrease in their nasal bone width postsurgery. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must?
  19. 19
    “…A registry study comparing ST and DT stems in dysplasia was designed, aiming to assess: (1) survival rates at long-term; (2) reasons for revision; (3) the profile of failed implants. METHODS: The arthroplasty registry RIPO was investigated for cementless THAs performed for dysplasia since 2000. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Titanium modular stems in total hip arthroplasty due to developmental dysplasia: a registry comparison with single-taper implants
  20. 20
    “…We hypothesized that (1) cementing a DMC into a TM shell decreases the risk of dislocation; (2) DMCs cemented into TM shells are not at greater risk of re-revision; (3) liberation of tantalum ions is marginal after use of this combined technique. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Do dual-mobility cups cemented into porous tantalum shells reduce the risk of dislocation after revision surgery?: A retrospective cohort study on 184 patients
Herramientas de búsqueda: RSS