“…In this paper, an argumentation‐based analysis of the Simonshaven case is given in terms of a logical formalism for argumentation. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Recent studies have examined the argumentative strategies used by young children in everyday situations as well as in experimental settings. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…At the heart of the platform lies an artificial agent that can moderate online discussions using argumentative messages. We investigate the influence of the agent on the evolution of an online debate involving human participants. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The maturity of the computational argumentation field, demonstrated with the first live debate between a machine and a human,(1) triggers a demanding question: how can we build argumentation technologies that bring people together? …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…This vulnerability motivates the position that belief involuntarism makes argument inherently adversarial (Casey, Informal Log 40:77–108, 2020), as well as the development of alternatives to adversarial argumentation such as “invitational rhetoric” (Foss and Griffin, Commun Monogr 62:2–18, 1995). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Nicholas Colgrove, Bruce Blackshaw, and Daniel Rodger call such arguments inconsistency arguments and contend they do not matter. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The prospects for a Biblical argument for dualism in the sense that contradicts physicalism are limited but remain open.…”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…In this study, through a series of acceptability judgment experiments examining argument structure mismatches in gapping, we provide empirical observations that challenge this prediction.…”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Insofar as philosophical inquiry treads the fine line between questioning the obvious while still seeking to say something significant about human experiences, perhaps a certain amount of what Lakatos describes as ‘monster-barring’—a rejection of overly fanciful, artificial putative counterexamples—has its place in philosophical argumentation.…”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Moreover, the roles of argumentative dialogue should be considered in studies on collaborative argumentation. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Given evidence that adolescent students’ motivation to read and write about literature declines with age, we proffer an approach called dialogic literary argumentation (DLA) that asks students to explore literature through argumentation in pursuit of understanding the meanings and possibilities of being human. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…In this case study, the examination of the verbal arguments of students showed that all groups engaged in the argumentation and produced quality arguments. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored with Douglas Walton, and is a further major contribution to the Woods-Walton Approach to the logic of fallacious reasoning No one disputes the formitable accomplishments of modern mathematical logic; but equally no one seriously believes that classical logic is much good for the analysis of real-life argument and reasoning, or that it is the best place in which to transact the business of fallacy theory One of the principal innovations of the book is its adaptation of systems of logic to the particular requirements of fallacy theory The book develops logical analyses which take into account such features of real-life cognitive agency as resource- availability and computational complexity The book is also an invitation to interdisciplinary cooperation, linking the relevant branches of logic with computer science, cognitive psychology, neurobiology, forensic science, linguistics, (including conversational analysis and discourse analysis) and argumentation theory Another distinctive feature of Woods’ approach to fallacy theory is its recognition of the highly defeasible character of fallacy-attributions On this view, reasoning is fallacious only in relation to the cognitive target that the reasoner seeks to hit, the standard required for its attainment, and the cognitive resources available to the reasoner Accordingly the so-called Standard Treatment of the fallacies is seriously misconceived Getting the fallacies right is an extremely important task for logic, indeed a central part of its mandate It is a task much more avowed than performed The Death of Argument is a major attempt to redress this inbalance…”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso