-
3141por Chang, Larry W., Mbabali, Ismail, Hutton, Heidi, Amico, K. Rivet, Kong, Xiangrong, Mulamba, Jeremiah, Anok, Aggrey, Ssekasanvu, Joseph, Long, Amanda, Thomas, Alvin G., Thomas, Kristin, Bugos, Eva, Pollard, Rose, van Wickle, Kimiko, Kennedy, Caitlin E., Nalugoda, Fred, Serwadda, David, Bollinger, Robert C., Quinn, Thomas C., Reynolds, Steven J., Gray, Ronald H., Wawer, Maria J., Nakigozi, Gertrude“…Secondary outcomes included HIV testing coverage, HIV incidence, and consistent condom use. The primary intent-to-treat analysis used log-linear binomial regression with generalized estimating equation to estimate prevalence risk ratios (PRR) in the intervention versus control arm. …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3142por Folayan, Morenike Oluwatoyin, El Tantawi, Maha, Aly, Nourhan M., Adeniyi, Abiola Adetokunbo, Oziegbe, Elizabeth, Arowolo, Olaniyi, Alade, Michael, Mapayi, Boladale, Chukwumah, Nneka Maureen, Oginni, Olakunle, Sam-Agudu, Nadia A.“…Survey data collected included respondents’ age, sex, and socioeconomic status, oral health risk factors (dental anxiety, frequency of tooth brushing intake of refined carbohydrates in-between-meals, flossing, dental visits, smoking, alcohol intake, use of psychoactive substances), caries experience, oral hygiene status, history of sexual abuse, and sexual risk behaviors (age of sexual debut, history of transactional sex, last sexual act with or without condom, multiple sex partners). Regression models were constructed to determine the association between outcome variables (dental anxiety, presence of caries experience and poor oral hygiene) and explanatory variables (oral health risk factors and history of sexual abuse). …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3143por Garga, Shirali, Thomas, Meryl, Bhatia, Ashneet, Sullivan, Aidan, John-Leader, Franklin, Pit, Sabrina“…Compared with people who had 1 partner, people who had 2-5 sexual partners in the previous year had almost 7 times the odds of using dating apps (odds ratio [OR] 6.581, 95% CI 4.643-9.328) and those who had more than 5 partners had 14 times the odds of using dating apps (OR 14.294, 95% CI 8.92-22.906). Condom users were more likely to be app users (P<.001), as were those who relied on emergency Plan B (P=.002), but people using hormonal contraception were less likely to use dating apps (P=.004). …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3144por Beres, Laura K, Mbabali, Ismail, Anok, Aggrey, Katabalwa, Charles, Mulamba, Jeremiah, Thomas, Alvin G, Bugos, Eva, Nakigozi, Gertrude, Grabowski, Mary K, Chang, Larry W“…Decreases in sex with a non–long-term partner without a condom were also reported in both arms (P1 to P3 control: 1.9% of days to 1% of days; intervention: 6.6% of days to 1.3% of days). …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3145por Brody, Carinne, Chhoun, Pheak, Tuot, Sovannary, Fehrenbacher, Anne E, Moran, Alexander, Swendeman, Dallas, Yi, Siyan“…The primary outcome measures included self-reported HIV and STI testing, condom use, and contraceptive use assessed through a face-to-face structured interview. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3146por Witte, Susan S., Filippone, Prema, Ssewamala, Fred M., Nabunya, Proscovia, Bahar, Ozge Sensoy, Mayo-Wilson, Larissa Jennings, Namuwonge, Flavia, Damulira, Christopher, Tozan, Yesim, Kiyingi, Joshua, Nabayinda, Josephine, Mwebembezi, Abel, Kagaayi, Joseph, McKay, Mary“…WESW experience poverty, gender-based violence, and other issues that reduce their power and limit their ability to negotiate condom use. Female-controlled strategies, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), may afford women more transmission protection, but barriers to access and use persist. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3147por Liu, Yusi, Fu, Guochen, Chen, Yifan, Wu, Lei, Pan, Mingliang, Yang, Yuli, Chen, Zhuo, Cao, Yu, Li, Yong, Wang, Hao, Wang, Bixiang, Lv, Chengcheng, Du, Ruyi, Xiong, Yanting, Liu, Wei, Xu, Nuo, Xia, Xiaobao, Li, Qianqian, Ruan, Fang, Wang, Junfang“…Those with more enabling resources [i.e., displaying high levels of condom use self-efficacy (AOR = 0.70, 95% CI:0.59–0.84) and being knowledge of local testing center (AOR = 0.71, 95% CI:0.60–0.83)] were less likely to report RD. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3148por Yu, Maohe, Song, Desheng, Zhang, Tiantian, Yao, Tingting, Chen, Yang, Liu, Yuanyuan, Peixoto, Elissa, Xu, Jie, Li, Zhijun, Yang, Jie, Li, Changping, Cui, Zhuang“…MSWs tends to be younger (26.50% in MSWs vs. 8.64% in MSM, P < 0.05), live alone (84.68% in MSWs vs. 47.98 in MSM, P < 0.05), get poor education (41.28% in MSWs vs. 28.45 in MSM, P < 0.05), use drug (8.09% in MSWs vs. 0.89% in MSM, P < 0.05), have more proportion of always use condom during anal sex (56.50% in MSWs vs. 41.95% in MSM, P < 0.05) but less proportion during commercial sex (81.28% in MSWs vs. 98.48% in MSM, P < 0.05), access HIV-related health services (65.96% in MSWs vs. 47.80% in MSM, P < 0.05) and have a HIV test last year(60.85% in MSWs vs. 41.27% in MSM, P < 0.05). …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3149por Ng’andu, Mwila, Mesic, Aldina, Pry, Jake, Mwamba, Chanda, Roff, Florence, Chipungu, Jenala, Azgad, Yael, Sharma, Anjali“…One study (4.8%) highlighted adolescent-specific outcomes and condom use. Most studies found declined access to and utilization of facility delivery, antenatal care, family planning, and HIV care. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3150por Sarenje, Kelvin L., Ngalamika, Owen, Maimbolwa, Margaret C., Siame, Amon, Munsaka, Sody M., Kwenda, Geoffrey“…Risk factors associated with AMR were douching in females (AOR 6.69, 95% CI; 1.11–40.31, p = 0.039), female gender (AOR 7.64, 95% CI; 1.11–52.33, p = 0.048), HIV-positivity (AOR 26.59, 95% CI; 3.67–192.7, p = 0.005), no condom use or unprotected sex (AOR 5.48, 95% CI; 1.17–22.75 p = 0.026), sex trading (AOR 4.19, 95% CI; 1.55–11.33, p = 0.010), and over-counter treatment of ciprofloxacin (AOR 3.44, 95% CI; 1.17–22.75, p = 0.023). …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3151por Chabata, Sungai T, Makandwa, Rumbidzo, Hensen, Bernadette, Mushati, Phillis, Chiyaka, Tarisai, Musemburi, Sithembile, Busza, Joanna, Floyd, Sian, Birdthistle, Isolde, Hargreaves, James R, Cowan, Frances M“…Regardless of referral approach, YWSS who accessed DREAMS had similar education levels, and a similar proportion tested HIV negative and reported not using a condom at the last sex act. A higher proportion of YWSS accessing DREAMS through RDS were aged 18-19 years (167/501, 33.3% vs 243/930, 26.1%; P=.004) and more likely to be aware of their HIV status (395/501, 78.8% vs 396/930, 42.6%; P<.001) compared to those accessing DREAMS services through peer outreach. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3152por Bhebhe, Lynnette, Moyo, Sikhulile, Gaseitsiwe, Simani, Pretorius-Holme, Molly, Yankinda, Etienne K., Manyake, Kutlo, Kgathi, Coulson, Mmalane, Mompati, Lebelonyane, Refeletswe, Gaolathe, Tendani, Bachanas, Pamela, Ussery, Faith, Letebele, Mpho, Makhema, Joseph, Wirth, Kathleen E., Lockman, Shahin, Essex, Max, Novitsky, Vlad, Ragonnet-Cronin, Manon“…CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that those with undiagnosed infections are likely to be young men and women who do not use condoms consistently. Among women, several factors were predictive: being married, educated, and testing frequently increased risk. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3153por Brouard, Cécile, Parenton, Fanny, Youssouf, Hassani, Chevaliez, Stéphane, Gordien, Emmanuel, Jean, Maxime, Bruyand, Mathias, Vaux, Sophie, Lot, Florence, Ruello, Marc“…The risk of lifetime HBV infection was higher in men (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 1.55, 95% CI: 1.29–1.89); in people aged 30–49 years (aPR: 3.83, 95% CI: 1.49–9.81) or 50–69 years (aPR: 4.52, 95% CI: 1.77–11.53) compared to those under 20; in individuals who reported no condom use during their first sexual intercourse (aPR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.01–2.14); and in those living in Dembeni-Mamoudzou (aPR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.09–1.80) compared to the West-Centre of Mayotte. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3154por James, Peter Bai, Osborne, Augustus, Bah, Abdulai Jawo, Margao, Emmanuel Kamanda, Conteh-Barrat, Mohamed“…Peer support was only found to be a protective factor against no condom use among Liberian adolescents (AOR = 0.608; 95%CI: 0.435–0.850). …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3155por Mugwanya, Kenneth K., Pintye, Jillian, Kinuthia, John, Abuna, Felix, Lagat, Harrison, Begnel, Emily R., Dettinger, Julia C., John-Stewart, Grace, Baeten, Jared M.“…Overall, 1,271 HIV-uninfected women accessing routine FP clinics were screened for PrEP; the median age was 25 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 22–29), 627 (49%) were <24 years old, 1,026 (82%) were married, more than one-third (34%) had partners of unknown HIV status, and the vast majority (n = 1,200 [94%]) reported recent condom-less sex. Of 1,271 women screened, 278 (22%) initiated PrEP, and 114 (41%) returned for at least one refill visit after initiation. …”
Publicado 2019
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3156por Kann, Laura, McManus, Tim, Harris, William A., Shanklin, Shari L., Flint, Katherine H., Queen, Barbara, Lowry, Richard, Chyen, David, Whittle, Lisa, Thornton, Jemekia, Lim, Connie, Bradford, Denise, Yamakawa, Yoshimi, Leon, Michelle, Brener, Nancy, Ethier, Kathleen A.“…Among currently sexually active students, 53.8% reported that either they or their partner had used a condom during their last sexual intercourse. Results from the 2017 national YRBS also indicated many high school students are engaged in behaviors associated with chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes. …”
Publicado 2018
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3157por Bose, Devi Leena, Hundal, Anhad, Singh, Sabina, Singh, Shweta, Seth, Kuhika, Hadi, Saif ul, Saran, Ashrita, Joseph, Jessy, Goyal, Kriti, Salve, Solomon“…These included messaging around consistent condom use, limiting sexual partners, routine testing, and awareness. …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3158por Lassi, Zohra S., Kedzior, Sophie G. E., Tariq, Wajeeha, Jadoon, Yamna, Das, Jai K., Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.“…The education on sexual health and contraception interventions to delay the age at first pregnancy may make little or no difference on risk of unintended pregnancy (risk ratio [RR], 0.42; 95% confidence internal [CI], 0.07–3.26; two studies, =490; random‐effect; χ (2) p .009; I (2) = 85%; low certainty of evidence using GRADE assessment), however, it significantly improved the use of condom (ever) (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08–2.20; six studies, n = 1604; random‐effect, heterogeneity: χ (2) p .004; I (2) = 71%). …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3159por Perera, Camila, Bakrania, Shivit, Ipince, Alessandra, Nesbitt‐Ahmed, Zahrah, Obasola, Oluwaseun, Richardson, Dominic, Van de Scheur, Jorinde, Yu, Ruichuan“…They improve knowledge and attitudes towards sexually transmitted infections, increase self‐reported condom use among boys and girls, increase child nutrition and overall household dietary intake, improve subjective wellbeing among women. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
3160por Dioh, W., Chabane, M., Tourette, C., Azbekyan, A., Morelot-Panzini, C., Hajjar, L. A., Lins, M., Nair, G. B., Whitehouse, T., Mariani, J., Latil, M., Camelo, S., Lafont, R., Dilda, P. J., Veillet, S., Agus, S.“…(Note: medically acceptable methods of contraception that may be used by the participant and/or partner include combined oral contraceptive, contraceptive vaginal ring, contraceptive injection, intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant, each supplemented with a condom, as well as sterilization and vasectomy). 10. …”
Publicado 2021
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto