Materias dentro de su búsqueda.
Materias dentro de su búsqueda.
-
1201por Gerhard-Herman, Marie D., Gornik, Heather L., Barrett, Coletta, Barshes, Neal R., Corriere, Matthew A., Drachman, Douglas E., Fleisher, Lee A., Flowkes, Francis Gerry R., Hamburg, Naomi M., Kinlay, Scott, Lookstein, Robert, Misra, Sanjay, Mureebe, Leila, Olin, Jeffrey W., Patel, Rajan A.G., Regensteiner, Judith G., Schanzer, Andres, Shishehbor, Mehdi H., Stewart, Kerry J., Treat-Jacobson, Diane, Walsh, M. Eileen, Halperin, Jonathan L.“…The Task Force recognizes the need for objective, independent Evidence Review Committees (ERCs) that include methodologists, epidemiologists, clinicians, and biostatisticians who systematically survey, abstract, and assess the evidence to address systematic review questions posed in the PICOTS format (P=population, I=intervention, C=comparator, O=outcome, T=timing, S=setting).(2,4–6) Practical considerations, including time and resource constraints, limit the ERCs to evidence that is relevant to key clinical questions and lends itself to systematic review and analysis that could affect the strength of corresponding recommendations. …”
Publicado 2016
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
1202por Gerhard-Herman, Marie D., Gornik, Heather L., Barrett, Coletta, Barshes, Neal R., Corriere, Matthew A., Drachman, Douglas E., Fleisher, Lee A., Fowkes, Francis Gerry R., Hamburg, Naomi M., Kinlay, Scott, Lookstein, Robert, Misra, Sanjay, Mureebe, Leila, Olin, Jeffrey W., Patel, Rajan A.G., Regensteiner, Judith G., Schanzer, Andres, Shishehbor, Mehdi H., Stewart, Kerry J., Treat-Jacobson, Diane, Walsh, M. Eileen, Halperin, Jonathan L.“…The Task Force recognizes the need for objective, independent Evidence Review Committees (ERCs) that include methodologists, epidemiologists, clinicians, and biostatisticians who systematically survey, abstract, and assess the evidence to address systematic review questions posed in the PICOTS format (P=population, I=intervention, C=comparator, O=outcome, T=timing, S=setting).(2,4–6) Practical considerations, including time and resource constraints, limit the ERCs to evidence that is relevant to key clinical questions and lends itself to systematic review and analysis that could affect the strength of corresponding recommendations. …”
Publicado 2016
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
1203por Goldenberg, Larry“…In summary, “expert views” from all walks of life (endocrinologists, epidemiologists, gerontologists, public health experts and urologists; lay press and regulatory agencies; pharmaceutical and film industry) is resulting in a cacophony of opinions creating much confusion and detriment to patients and physicians alike. …”
Publicado 2014
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto