“…RESULTS: Mean thickness of buccal plate 3 mm below CEJ was 0.68 ± 0.29 mm at central incisor, 0.76 ± 0.59 mm at lateral incisor, and 1.07 ± 0.80 mm at canine. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Mean intrafractional chest wall WEL changes during respiration varied by: −4.1 mm (<−10.2 mm), −3.6 mm (<−7.1 mm), −3.2 mm (<−5.6 mm) and −2.5 mm (<−5.1 mm) during respiration in the ITV, upper, middle and lower lung regions, respectively. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The highest IOP increase (P<0.01) was measured in the Adho Mukha Svanasana position (IOP increase from 17±3.2 mmHg to 28±3.8 mmHg in glaucoma patients; from 17±2.8 mmHg to 29±3.9 mmHg in normal individuals), followed by the Uttanasana position (17±3.9 mmHg to 27±3.4 mmHg (glaucoma patients) and from 18±2.5 mmHg to 26±3.6 mmHg normal individuals)), the Halasana position (18±2.8 mmHg to 24±3.5 mmHg (glaucoma patients); 18±2.7 mmHg to 22±3.4 mmHg (normal individuals)), and finally the Viparita Kirani position (17±4 mmHg to 21±3.6 mmHg (glaucoma patients); 17±2.8 to 21±2.4 mmHg (normal individuals)). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Intra‐observer uncertainties for image registration in the left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), craniocaudal (CC) directions and three‐dimensional vector (3D) were 0.9 mm, 0.9 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.1 mm (SD) for tumor registration and 0.3 mm, 0. 5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.7 mm (SD) for marker registration. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The deviation in PBC calculated PDD were (+)216%, (+91%), (+)45%, (+)26.88%, (+)14%, (-)1%, (+)2%, (-)0.4%, (-)1%, (+)1%, (+)4%, (+)4.5% for 0.4 gm/cm3 and (+)311%, (+)177%, (+)118%, (+)90.95%, (+)72.23%, (+)55.83% ,(+)38.85%, (+)28.80%, (+)21.79%, (+)15.95%, (+)1.67%, (-) 2.13%, (+)1.27%, (+)0.35%, (-)1.79%, (-)2.75% for 0.2 gm/cm3 density mediums at depths of 1mm, 2mm, 3mm, 4mm, 5mm, 6 mm, 7 mm, 8mm, 9mm,10mm, 15mm, 30mm, 40mm, 50mm, 80mm and 100 mm, respectively. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Different pressure levels (0, −10, −20, −40, and −60 mmHg) were tested in randomized order. Maximal arterial blood flow relative to baseline (median [25th, 75th percentiles]) was: 0 mmHg; 1.08 (1.02, 1.13), −10 mmHg; 1.11 (1.07, 1.17), −20 mmHg; 1.18 (1.11, 1.32), −40 mmHg; 1.39 (1.27, 1.91) and −60 mmHg; 1.48 (1.37, 1.78). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The recommended minimum anisotropic margins are 1.7 mm/2.7 mm (superior/inferior); 0.8 mm (left/right), 1.7 mm/2.9 mm (anterior/posterior) for VMAT treatments and 2.9 mm/4.3 mm (superior/inferior), 1.5 mm (left/right), 2.8 mm/4.8 mm (anterior/posterior) for IMRT treatments. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Axial elongation was slower in the 5‐MM group (0.04 ± 0.15 mm) than the 6‐MM group (0.17 ± 0.13 mm) (p = 0.001). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…SGRT intrafraction mean values were: i_, m_, f_ longitudinally 0.09 mm, 0.45 mm, 0.31 mm; i_, m_, f_ laterally 0.07 mm, 0.36 mm, 0.20 mm; i_, m_, f_ vertically 0.06 mm, 0.31 mm, 0.22 mm; i_, m_, f_ roll 0.025°, 0.208°, 0.118°; i_, m_, f_ pitch 0.036°, 0.307°, 0.194°; i_, m_, f_ yaw 0.039°, 0.274°, 0.189°. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The non-digital templated cohort had a LLD of <5mm in 50% of cases, 5-10mm in 28% and >10mm in 22%. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…An offset tool was designed to control the distance between electrodes and target tissue; deliveries were placed 0 mm (0 mm offset), 2 mm (2 mm offset), and 4 mm away from the tissue (4 mm offset). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…RESULTS: SNR was significantly higher with Sub-mm with dDLR (P < .001) and Standard (P = .005) than with Sub-mm without dDLR and was comparable between Sub-mm with dDLR and Standard (P = .511). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…In the static experiments, the static location errors of the proposed system in the range of 200 mm to 320 mm are 0.51 mm, 0.50 mm and 0.53 mm, whereas the errors of a commercial laser sensor are 2.89 mm, 0.62 mm, and N\A. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Objectives: The impaction of the second mandibular molar (MM2) has recently become more prevalent. Several etiological hypothesis have been proposed to investigate the association between skeletal features and impaction of MM2. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Aim: Malignant melanoma (MM) is a highly aggressive cutaneous cancer with undetermined underlying genetic disposition. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…MM is always preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS), which progresses to asymptomatic-MM (aMM) or symptomatic-MM (sMM) at a rate of 1% per year. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Results  The greatest distance to PL is found at L5 (median: 30.1 mm, range: 13.5–37.1 mm). The median and ranges for each slice are as follows: L1 (median: 0.0 mm, range: 0.0–19.9 mm), L2 (median: 0.0 mm, range: 0.0–21.5 mm), L3 (median: 15.8 mm, range: 0.0–31.7 mm), L4 (median: 26.1 mm, range: 0.0–34.0 mm), L5 (median: 30.1 mm, range: 13.5–37.1 mm), L6 (median: 29.0 mm, range: 0.0–36.3 mm), L7 (median: 20.8 mm, range: 0.0–39.2 mm). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Different thickness of filters of Al and Cu (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm) and filter combinations Cu 1 mm, Cu 2 mm, Cu 3 mm each in combination with Al (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm), respectively, were used. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…RESULTS: All mice died in the following AAC groups: 18g/0.35 mm, 22 g/0.35 mm, 26 g/0.35 mm, 22 g/0.40 mm, and 26 g/0.40 mm. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (EDTRS) grid (6 × 6 mm) divided the RNFL into the thickness maps. The FD% values of the CC were calculated on the 3 × 3-mm scans in a 1-mm circle (C(1)), 1.5-mm rim (R(1.5)), and the entire 2.5-mm circle (C(2.5)), and on the 6 x 6-mm scans in a 1-mm circle (C(1)), 1.5-mm rim (R(1.5)), the entire 2.5-mm circle (C(2.5)), 2.5-mm rim (R(2.5)), and 5-mm circle (C(5)). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso