“…Based on our observed statistical associations, our dynamic model predicts that increasing OAT coverage from approximately 21% to 40%, 50%, or 60% among PWID could reduce annual IDU initiations by 11.5% (95% I 2.4–21.7), 17.3% (95% I 5.6–29.4), and 22.8% (95% I 8.1–36.8) and reduce the PWID population size by 5.4% (95% I 0.1–12.0), 8.2% (95% I 2.2–16.9), and 10.9% (95% I 3.2–21.8) relative to baseline, respectively, in a decade. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The abundance of microbiome was not observed any statistical difference in subgroups with different weight. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…These differences were no longer statistically significant in the instrumental variable analyses. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…For the primary aim, the adjusted least square mean (SD) xerostomia score in the TA group (26.6 [17.7]) was significantly lower than in the SCC group (34.8 [18.7]) (P = .001; effect size = −0.44) and marginally lower but not statistically significant different from the SA group (31.3 [18.6]) (P = .06; effect size = −0.26). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics and in outcome variables (HHI, GSES, and SF-12v2 mental component score and physical component score) between users and nonusers. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The odds of engaging in any leisure PA at 12 months tended to be higher in the I-ACE arm versus SLA arm, but did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio 2.8; 95% CI 0.7-11.6; P=.16). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Patients treated by the first group had a significantly larger reduction of fatigue severity (15.7 vs 9.0; t=2.42; P=.02). There were no (statistically significant) correlations between therapists’ attitudes and reduction in fatigue. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Response rates to treatment were also established. No between-group statistical comparisons were planned. RESULTS: HbA1c mean reductions were − 1.26% (90% CI − 1.7%, − 0.8%), − 1.12% (90% CI − 1.4%, − 0.8%), − 1.29% (90% CI − 1.6%, − 1.0%), and − 1.15% (90% CI − 1.5%, − 0.8%) in groups EVO 2.5 mg, EVO 5 mg, EVO 10 mg, and SITA 100 mg, respectively. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Standardised incidence/mortality ratios (SIRs/SMRs) relative to population incidences or mortality rates, absolute risks, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using cohort and survival analysis methods. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Participants on the patient decision aid arm compared to the SC arm demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in decisional self-efficacy (P=.05) and a reduction in the informed sub-score of decisional conflict (P=.003) at 3 months, with an improvement in preparation for decision making (P<.001) at 6 months. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…As for the total effective rate, the meta-analysis of 27 RCTs showed a significant effect of moxibustion VS western medicine (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.25, I(2) = 45%, P=0.007); as for the WOMAC scale, the subgroup meta-analysis of 13 trials showed that there was a statistically significant effect of moxibustion VS western medicine (MD = −11.08, 95% CI = −11.72 to −10.44, I(2) = 98%, P < 0.00001) and 2 trials on moxibustion VS negative control (MD = −8.38, 95% CI = −12.69 to −4.06, I(2) = 0%, P=0.77); as for the VAS score, the meta-analysis of 6 trials showed that there was a significant effect of moxibustion VS western medicine (MD = −2.12, 95% CI = −2.30 to −1.93, I(2) = 98%, P < 0.00001); as for the symptom score, the meta-analysis of 7 trials showed that there was a significant effect of moxibustion VS western medicine (MD = −0.81, 95% CI = −1.24 to −0.37, I(2) = 50%, P=0.06); as for the Lysholm score, the meta-analysis of 5 trials showed that there was a significant effect of moxibustion VS western medicine (MD = 7.61, 95% CI = 6.04 to 9.17, I(2) = 95%, P < 0.00001); and as for the Lequesne score, the meta-analysis of 3 trials showed that there was a significant effect of moxibustion VS western medicine (MD = 3.29, 95% CI = 2.93 to 3.65, I(2) = 99%, P < 0.00001). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…At the final follow-up, 3 (5.0%) of 60 knees in group A compared with 4 (6.9%) of 58 knees in group B failed and converted to total knee arthroplasty, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.933). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Any reported adverse drug reactions were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Patients were classified into 4 categories: MBI-LCBI (1481 [8.8%]), MBI-LCBI and BSI-other (698 [4.1%]), BSI-other only (2928 [17.4%]), and controls with no BSI (11 768 [69.7%]). Statistical analysis was performed from April 5 to July 17, 2018. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Values with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and Odds Ratio with 95% CI was used to measure strength of association. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…For unvaccinated individuals, HBsAg positivity was statistically significant correlated with gender [RR = 1.47, 95%CI = 1.04–2.06, in 2006], residence (urban versus rural, RR = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.24–0.67, in 2006; RR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.34–0.99, in 2014), sharing syringes [RR = 3.75, 95%CI = 1.33–10.63 (in 2006); RR = 2.07, 95%CI = 1.26–3.41 (in 2014)], infected wives (RR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.28–3.05, in 2006), and infected husbands (RR = 2.19, 95%CI = 1.25–3.82, in 2006). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The secondary outcome reported is the mortality among the stroke survivors because the number of stroke-related complications was higher in the control group than in the intervention group (13/155, 8.4% vs 2/155, 1.3%), and this difference was statistically significant (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Movies4Stroke trial failed to achieve its primary specified outcome. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…There were also time × temperament trait × sex interactions with the CS (p = 0.0003) and FS(CAT) (p = 0.043) categories; however, time × temperament trait interactions were not statistically significant. Results from this study suggest that cattle with excitable temperaments, as evaluated by FS and CS, have a greater increase in T(REC). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and analyzed statistically. Tolerability was assessed based on physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory tests, and subject interviews. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Results were collated with data on serology (including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyl transferase) and exposures of interest: alcohol consumption (via the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test for Consumption [AUDIT-C] and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 criteria for alcohol use disorder), body-mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio, socioeconomic status (based on predefined ALSPAC markers), and sex. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso