Cargando…

Rebuttal to ‘Comments on “The HARP Time Projection Chamber: Characteristics and physics performance”’

We categorically reject the accusations by the ‘HARP Collaboration’ that we plagiarized their work. Out of their 27 comments on our work, 26 are either wrong, or inappropriate, or without substance.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ammosov, V, Dydak, F, Bolshakova, A, Boyko, I, Chelkov, G, Dedovitch, D, De Min, A, Elagin, A, Gapienko, V, Gostkin, M, Guskov, A, Koreshev, V, Krumshtein, Z, Linssen, L, Nefedov, Yu, Nikolaev, K, Semak, A, Sviridov, Yu, Usenko, E, Wotschack, J, Zaets, V, Zhemchugov, A
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/1110969
_version_ 1780914289830264832
author Ammosov, V
Dydak, F
Bolshakova, A
Boyko, I
Chelkov, G
Dedovitch, D
De Min, A
Elagin, A
Gapienko, V
Gostkin, M
Guskov, A
Koreshev, V
Krumshtein, Z
Linssen, L
Nefedov, Yu
Nikolaev, K
Semak, A
Sviridov, Yu
Usenko, E
Wotschack, J
Zaets, V
Zhemchugov, A
author_facet Ammosov, V
Dydak, F
Bolshakova, A
Boyko, I
Chelkov, G
Dedovitch, D
De Min, A
Elagin, A
Gapienko, V
Gostkin, M
Guskov, A
Koreshev, V
Krumshtein, Z
Linssen, L
Nefedov, Yu
Nikolaev, K
Semak, A
Sviridov, Yu
Usenko, E
Wotschack, J
Zaets, V
Zhemchugov, A
author_sort Ammosov, V
collection CERN
description We categorically reject the accusations by the ‘HARP Collaboration’ that we plagiarized their work. Out of their 27 comments on our work, 26 are either wrong, or inappropriate, or without substance.
id cern-1110969
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2008
record_format invenio
spelling cern-11109692019-09-30T06:29:59Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1110969engAmmosov, VDydak, FBolshakova, ABoyko, IChelkov, GDedovitch, DDe Min, AElagin, AGapienko, VGostkin, MGuskov, AKoreshev, VKrumshtein, ZLinssen, LNefedov, YuNikolaev, KSemak, ASviridov, YuUsenko, EWotschack, JZaets, VZhemchugov, ARebuttal to ‘Comments on “The HARP Time Projection Chamber: Characteristics and physics performance”’Detectors and Experimental TechniquesWe categorically reject the accusations by the ‘HARP Collaboration’ that we plagiarized their work. Out of their 27 comments on our work, 26 are either wrong, or inappropriate, or without substance.oai:cds.cern.ch:11109692008
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
Ammosov, V
Dydak, F
Bolshakova, A
Boyko, I
Chelkov, G
Dedovitch, D
De Min, A
Elagin, A
Gapienko, V
Gostkin, M
Guskov, A
Koreshev, V
Krumshtein, Z
Linssen, L
Nefedov, Yu
Nikolaev, K
Semak, A
Sviridov, Yu
Usenko, E
Wotschack, J
Zaets, V
Zhemchugov, A
Rebuttal to ‘Comments on “The HARP Time Projection Chamber: Characteristics and physics performance”’
title Rebuttal to ‘Comments on “The HARP Time Projection Chamber: Characteristics and physics performance”’
title_full Rebuttal to ‘Comments on “The HARP Time Projection Chamber: Characteristics and physics performance”’
title_fullStr Rebuttal to ‘Comments on “The HARP Time Projection Chamber: Characteristics and physics performance”’
title_full_unstemmed Rebuttal to ‘Comments on “The HARP Time Projection Chamber: Characteristics and physics performance”’
title_short Rebuttal to ‘Comments on “The HARP Time Projection Chamber: Characteristics and physics performance”’
title_sort rebuttal to ‘comments on “the harp time projection chamber: characteristics and physics performance”’
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/1110969
work_keys_str_mv AT ammosovv rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT dydakf rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT bolshakovaa rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT boykoi rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT chelkovg rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT dedovitchd rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT demina rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT elagina rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT gapienkov rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT gostkinm rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT guskova rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT koreshevv rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT krumshteinz rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT linssenl rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT nefedovyu rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT nikolaevk rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT semaka rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT sviridovyu rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT usenkoe rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT wotschackj rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT zaetsv rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance
AT zhemchugova rebuttaltocommentsontheharptimeprojectionchambercharacteristicsandphysicsperformance