Cargando…
Rebuttal to ‘Comments on “The HARP Time Projection Chamber: Characteristics and physics performance”’
We categorically reject the accusations by the ‘HARP Collaboration’ that we plagiarized their work. Out of their 27 comments on our work, 26 are either wrong, or inappropriate, or without substance.
Autores principales: | Ammosov, V, Dydak, F, Bolshakova, A, Boyko, I, Chelkov, G, Dedovitch, D, De Min, A, Elagin, A, Gapienko, V, Gostkin, M, Guskov, A, Koreshev, V, Krumshtein, Z, Linssen, L, Nefedov, Yu, Nikolaev, K, Semak, A, Sviridov, Yu, Usenko, E, Wotschack, J, Zaets, V, Zhemchugov, A |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/1110969 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Status report of the HARP-CDP group
por: Bolshakova, A, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Third Addendum to the HARP WhiteBook
por: Ammosov, V, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
On the flaws in 'Official' HARP's data analysis
por: Bolshakova, A, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
2008 Status Report of the HARP-CDP group
por: Bolshakova, A, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
The HARP Resistive Plate Chambers: Characteristics and Physics Performance
por: Boyko, I, et al.
Publicado: (2007)