Cargando…
Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology
It is essential to characterize power MosFETs regarding their tolerance to destructive Single Event Burnouts (SEB). Therefore, several non-destructive test methods have been developed to evaluate the SEB cross-section of power devices. A power MosFET has been evaluated using a test circuit, designed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2014.2320292 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2124627 |
_version_ | 1780949573244551168 |
---|---|
author | Oser, P Mekki, J Spiezia, G Fadakis, E Foucard, G Peronnard, P Masi, A Gaillard, R |
author_facet | Oser, P Mekki, J Spiezia, G Fadakis, E Foucard, G Peronnard, P Masi, A Gaillard, R |
author_sort | Oser, P |
collection | CERN |
description | It is essential to characterize power MosFETs regarding their tolerance to destructive Single Event Burnouts (SEB). Therefore, several non-destructive test methods have been developed to evaluate the SEB cross-section of power devices. A power MosFET has been evaluated using a test circuit, designed according to standard non-destructive test methods discussed in the literature. Guidelines suggest a prior adaptation of auxiliary components to the device sensitivity before the radiation test. With the first value chosen for the de-coupling capacitor, the external component initiated destructive events and affected the evaluation of the cross-section. As a result, the influence of auxiliary components on the device cross-section was studied. This paper presents the obtained experimental results, supported by SPICE simulations, to evaluate and discuss how the circuit effectiveness depends on the external components. |
id | cern-2124627 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-21246272019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1109/TNS.2014.2320292http://cds.cern.ch/record/2124627engOser, PMekki, JSpiezia, GFadakis, EFoucard, GPeronnard, PMasi, AGaillard, REffectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test MethodologyXXIt is essential to characterize power MosFETs regarding their tolerance to destructive Single Event Burnouts (SEB). Therefore, several non-destructive test methods have been developed to evaluate the SEB cross-section of power devices. A power MosFET has been evaluated using a test circuit, designed according to standard non-destructive test methods discussed in the literature. Guidelines suggest a prior adaptation of auxiliary components to the device sensitivity before the radiation test. With the first value chosen for the de-coupling capacitor, the external component initiated destructive events and affected the evaluation of the cross-section. As a result, the influence of auxiliary components on the device cross-section was studied. This paper presents the obtained experimental results, supported by SPICE simulations, to evaluate and discuss how the circuit effectiveness depends on the external components.oai:cds.cern.ch:21246272014 |
spellingShingle | XX Oser, P Mekki, J Spiezia, G Fadakis, E Foucard, G Peronnard, P Masi, A Gaillard, R Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology |
title | Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology |
title_full | Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology |
title_short | Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology |
title_sort | effectiveness analysis of a non-destructive single event burnout test methodology |
topic | XX |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2014.2320292 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2124627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oserp effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology AT mekkij effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology AT spieziag effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology AT fadakise effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology AT foucardg effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology AT peronnardp effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology AT masia effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology AT gaillardr effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology |