Cargando…

Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology

It is essential to characterize power MosFETs regarding their tolerance to destructive Single Event Burnouts (SEB). Therefore, several non-destructive test methods have been developed to evaluate the SEB cross-section of power devices. A power MosFET has been evaluated using a test circuit, designed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oser, P, Mekki, J, Spiezia, G, Fadakis, E, Foucard, G, Peronnard, P, Masi, A, Gaillard, R
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
XX
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2014.2320292
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2124627
_version_ 1780949573244551168
author Oser, P
Mekki, J
Spiezia, G
Fadakis, E
Foucard, G
Peronnard, P
Masi, A
Gaillard, R
author_facet Oser, P
Mekki, J
Spiezia, G
Fadakis, E
Foucard, G
Peronnard, P
Masi, A
Gaillard, R
author_sort Oser, P
collection CERN
description It is essential to characterize power MosFETs regarding their tolerance to destructive Single Event Burnouts (SEB). Therefore, several non-destructive test methods have been developed to evaluate the SEB cross-section of power devices. A power MosFET has been evaluated using a test circuit, designed according to standard non-destructive test methods discussed in the literature. Guidelines suggest a prior adaptation of auxiliary components to the device sensitivity before the radiation test. With the first value chosen for the de-coupling capacitor, the external component initiated destructive events and affected the evaluation of the cross-section. As a result, the influence of auxiliary components on the device cross-section was studied. This paper presents the obtained experimental results, supported by SPICE simulations, to evaluate and discuss how the circuit effectiveness depends on the external components.
id cern-2124627
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2014
record_format invenio
spelling cern-21246272019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1109/TNS.2014.2320292http://cds.cern.ch/record/2124627engOser, PMekki, JSpiezia, GFadakis, EFoucard, GPeronnard, PMasi, AGaillard, REffectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test MethodologyXXIt is essential to characterize power MosFETs regarding their tolerance to destructive Single Event Burnouts (SEB). Therefore, several non-destructive test methods have been developed to evaluate the SEB cross-section of power devices. A power MosFET has been evaluated using a test circuit, designed according to standard non-destructive test methods discussed in the literature. Guidelines suggest a prior adaptation of auxiliary components to the device sensitivity before the radiation test. With the first value chosen for the de-coupling capacitor, the external component initiated destructive events and affected the evaluation of the cross-section. As a result, the influence of auxiliary components on the device cross-section was studied. This paper presents the obtained experimental results, supported by SPICE simulations, to evaluate and discuss how the circuit effectiveness depends on the external components.oai:cds.cern.ch:21246272014
spellingShingle XX
Oser, P
Mekki, J
Spiezia, G
Fadakis, E
Foucard, G
Peronnard, P
Masi, A
Gaillard, R
Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology
title Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology
title_full Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology
title_fullStr Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology
title_short Effectiveness Analysis of a Non-Destructive Single Event Burnout Test Methodology
title_sort effectiveness analysis of a non-destructive single event burnout test methodology
topic XX
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2014.2320292
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2124627
work_keys_str_mv AT oserp effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology
AT mekkij effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology
AT spieziag effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology
AT fadakise effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology
AT foucardg effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology
AT peronnardp effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology
AT masia effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology
AT gaillardr effectivenessanalysisofanondestructivesingleeventburnouttestmethodology