Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions

BACKGROUND: Indoor aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has been widely recognised, especially in schools where children remain in closed indoor spaces and largely unvaccinated. Measures such as strategic natural ventilation and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration remain poorly implement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villers, Jennifer, Henriques, Andre, Calarco, Serafina, Rognlien, Markus, Mounet, Nicolas, Devine, James, Azzopardi, Gabriella, Elson, Philip, Andreini, Marco, Tarocco, Nicola, Vassella, Claudia, Keiser, Olivia
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.4414/smw.2022.w30178
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2839271
_version_ 1780975957907079168
author Villers, Jennifer
Henriques, Andre
Calarco, Serafina
Rognlien, Markus
Mounet, Nicolas
Devine, James
Azzopardi, Gabriella
Elson, Philip
Andreini, Marco
Tarocco, Nicola
Vassella, Claudia
Keiser, Olivia
author_facet Villers, Jennifer
Henriques, Andre
Calarco, Serafina
Rognlien, Markus
Mounet, Nicolas
Devine, James
Azzopardi, Gabriella
Elson, Philip
Andreini, Marco
Tarocco, Nicola
Vassella, Claudia
Keiser, Olivia
author_sort Villers, Jennifer
collection CERN
description BACKGROUND: Indoor aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has been widely recognised, especially in schools where children remain in closed indoor spaces and largely unvaccinated. Measures such as strategic natural ventilation and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration remain poorly implemented and mask mandates are often progressively lifted as vaccination rollout is enhanced. METHODS: We adapted a previously developed aerosol transmission model to study the effect of interventions (natural ventilation, face masks, HEPA filtration and their combinations) on the concentration of virus particles in a classroom of 160 m3 containing one infectious individual. The cumulative dose of viruses absorbed by exposed occupants was calculated. RESULTS: In the absence of interventions, the cumulative dose absorbed was 1.5 times higher in winter than in spring/summer, increasing chances of indoor airborne transmission in winter. However, natural ventilation was more effective in winter, leading to up to a 20-fold decrease in cumulative dose when six windows were fully open at all times. In winter, partly opening two windows all day or fully opening six windows at the end of each class was effective as well (2.7- to 3-fold decrease). In summer, good ventilation levels could be achieved through the opening of windows all day long (2- to 7-fold decrease depending on the number of windows open). Opening windows only during yard and lunch breaks had minimal effect (≤1.5-fold decrease). One HEPA filter was as effective as two windows partly open all day in winter (3-fold decrease) whereas two filters were more effective (5-fold decrease). Surgical face masks were very effective independently of the season (8-fold decrease). Combined interventions (i.e., natural ventilation, masks, and HEPA filtration) were the most effective (≥25-fold decrease) and remained highly effective in the presence of a super-spreader. INTERPRETATION: Natural ventilation, face masks, and HEPA filtration are effective interventions to reduce SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission. These measures should be combined and complemented by additional interventions (e.g., physical distancing, hygiene, testing, contact tracing and vaccination) to maximise benefit.
id cern-2839271
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2022
record_format invenio
spelling cern-28392712022-11-08T14:12:02Zdoi:10.4414/smw.2022.w30178http://cds.cern.ch/record/2839271engVillers, JenniferHenriques, AndreCalarco, SerafinaRognlien, MarkusMounet, NicolasDevine, JamesAzzopardi, GabriellaElson, PhilipAndreini, MarcoTarocco, NicolaVassella, ClaudiaKeiser, OliviaSARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventionsHealth Physics and Radiation EffectsBACKGROUND: Indoor aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has been widely recognised, especially in schools where children remain in closed indoor spaces and largely unvaccinated. Measures such as strategic natural ventilation and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration remain poorly implemented and mask mandates are often progressively lifted as vaccination rollout is enhanced. METHODS: We adapted a previously developed aerosol transmission model to study the effect of interventions (natural ventilation, face masks, HEPA filtration and their combinations) on the concentration of virus particles in a classroom of 160 m3 containing one infectious individual. The cumulative dose of viruses absorbed by exposed occupants was calculated. RESULTS: In the absence of interventions, the cumulative dose absorbed was 1.5 times higher in winter than in spring/summer, increasing chances of indoor airborne transmission in winter. However, natural ventilation was more effective in winter, leading to up to a 20-fold decrease in cumulative dose when six windows were fully open at all times. In winter, partly opening two windows all day or fully opening six windows at the end of each class was effective as well (2.7- to 3-fold decrease). In summer, good ventilation levels could be achieved through the opening of windows all day long (2- to 7-fold decrease depending on the number of windows open). Opening windows only during yard and lunch breaks had minimal effect (≤1.5-fold decrease). One HEPA filter was as effective as two windows partly open all day in winter (3-fold decrease) whereas two filters were more effective (5-fold decrease). Surgical face masks were very effective independently of the season (8-fold decrease). Combined interventions (i.e., natural ventilation, masks, and HEPA filtration) were the most effective (≥25-fold decrease) and remained highly effective in the presence of a super-spreader. INTERPRETATION: Natural ventilation, face masks, and HEPA filtration are effective interventions to reduce SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission. These measures should be combined and complemented by additional interventions (e.g., physical distancing, hygiene, testing, contact tracing and vaccination) to maximise benefit.oai:cds.cern.ch:28392712022
spellingShingle Health Physics and Radiation Effects
Villers, Jennifer
Henriques, Andre
Calarco, Serafina
Rognlien, Markus
Mounet, Nicolas
Devine, James
Azzopardi, Gabriella
Elson, Philip
Andreini, Marco
Tarocco, Nicola
Vassella, Claudia
Keiser, Olivia
SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions
title SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions
title_full SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions
title_short SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions
title_sort sars-cov-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions
topic Health Physics and Radiation Effects
url https://dx.doi.org/10.4414/smw.2022.w30178
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2839271
work_keys_str_mv AT villersjennifer sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT henriquesandre sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT calarcoserafina sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT rognlienmarkus sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT mounetnicolas sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT devinejames sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT azzopardigabriella sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT elsonphilip sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT andreinimarco sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT tarocconicola sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT vassellaclaudia sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions
AT keiserolivia sarscov2aerosoltransmissioninschoolstheeffectivenessofdifferentinterventions