Cargando…
Learning Goals of Professional Development Programs at Science Research Institutions: A Delphi Study with Different Stakeholder Groups
Effective professional development programs (PDPs) rely on welldefined goals. However, recent studies on PDPs have not explored the goals from a multi-stakeholder perspective. This study identifies the most important learning goals of PDPs at science research institutions as perceived by four groups...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2021.1905330 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2771527 |
Sumario: | Effective professional development programs (PDPs) rely on welldefined goals. However, recent studies on PDPs have not explored
the goals from a multi-stakeholder perspective. This study identifies
the most important learning goals of PDPs at science research institutions as perceived by four groups of stakeholders, namely teachers,
education researchers, government representatives, and research
scientists. Altogether, over 100 stakeholders from 42 countries
involved in PDPs at science research institutions in Europe and North
America participated in a three-round Delphi study. In the first round,
the stakeholders provided their opinions on what they thought the
learning goals of PDPs should be through an open-ended questionnaire. In the second and third rounds, the stakeholders assessed the
importance of the learning goals that emerged from the first round by
rating and ranking them, respectively. The outcome of the study is
a hierarchical list of the ten most important learning goals of PDPs at
particle physics laboratories. The stakeholders identified enhancing
teachers’ knowledge of scientific concepts and models and enhancing
their knowledge of the curricula as the most important learning goals.
Furthermore, the results show strong agreement between all the
stakeholder groups regarding the defined learning goals. Indeed, all
groups ranked the learning goals by their perceived importance
almost identically. These outcomes could help policymakers establish
more specific policies for PDPs. Additionally, they provide PDP practitioners at science research institutions with a solid base for future
research and planning endeavors. |
---|