Cargando…

Is time‐restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Time‐restricted eating (TRE) is a new therapeutic strategy for the management of weight loss and dysmetabolic diseases. At present, TRE (8/16, 8 h eating:16 h fasting) is the most common form of TRE. Therefore, this meta‐analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TRE (8/16) in overweig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Lu, Chen, Yan, Wen, Shu, Lu, Danhua, Shen, Xiaoyang, Deng, Hongxia, Xu, Liangzhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3194
_version_ 1784904494786543616
author Huang, Lu
Chen, Yan
Wen, Shu
Lu, Danhua
Shen, Xiaoyang
Deng, Hongxia
Xu, Liangzhi
author_facet Huang, Lu
Chen, Yan
Wen, Shu
Lu, Danhua
Shen, Xiaoyang
Deng, Hongxia
Xu, Liangzhi
author_sort Huang, Lu
collection PubMed
description Time‐restricted eating (TRE) is a new therapeutic strategy for the management of weight loss and dysmetabolic diseases. At present, TRE (8/16, 8 h eating:16 h fasting) is the most common form of TRE. Therefore, this meta‐analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TRE (8/16) in overweight and obese adults to determine its impact on body weight and metabolism. Articles reviewed from PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register for the relevant RCTs that compared TRE (8/16) to non‐TRE in overweight and obese adults. Eight RCTs were included in this meta‐analysis. Participants following TRE (8/16) showed significant body weight reduction (mean difference [MD]: −1.48 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.53 to −0.44) and fat mass reduction (MD: −1.09 kg, 95% CI: −1.55 to −0.63). There was no significant difference in lean mass change with TRE intervention (MD: −0.48 kg, 95% CI: −1.02 to 0.05, p = .08, I (2) = 41%). The energy restriction and early TRE (eTRE) subgroups resulted in greater weight loss. TRE (8/16) showed beneficial effects on the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR, MD: −0.32, 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.06), but had no significant effect on other parameters of glucose metabolism and lipid profiles. In conclusion, TRE (8/16), especially eTRE, or in combination with caloric intake restriction, is a potential therapeutic strategy for weight control in overweight and obese adults. TRE (8/16) also reduced HOMA‐IR; therefore, it may have a positive effect on glucose metabolism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10002957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100029572023-03-11 Is time‐restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials Huang, Lu Chen, Yan Wen, Shu Lu, Danhua Shen, Xiaoyang Deng, Hongxia Xu, Liangzhi Food Sci Nutr Reviews Time‐restricted eating (TRE) is a new therapeutic strategy for the management of weight loss and dysmetabolic diseases. At present, TRE (8/16, 8 h eating:16 h fasting) is the most common form of TRE. Therefore, this meta‐analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TRE (8/16) in overweight and obese adults to determine its impact on body weight and metabolism. Articles reviewed from PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register for the relevant RCTs that compared TRE (8/16) to non‐TRE in overweight and obese adults. Eight RCTs were included in this meta‐analysis. Participants following TRE (8/16) showed significant body weight reduction (mean difference [MD]: −1.48 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.53 to −0.44) and fat mass reduction (MD: −1.09 kg, 95% CI: −1.55 to −0.63). There was no significant difference in lean mass change with TRE intervention (MD: −0.48 kg, 95% CI: −1.02 to 0.05, p = .08, I (2) = 41%). The energy restriction and early TRE (eTRE) subgroups resulted in greater weight loss. TRE (8/16) showed beneficial effects on the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR, MD: −0.32, 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.06), but had no significant effect on other parameters of glucose metabolism and lipid profiles. In conclusion, TRE (8/16), especially eTRE, or in combination with caloric intake restriction, is a potential therapeutic strategy for weight control in overweight and obese adults. TRE (8/16) also reduced HOMA‐IR; therefore, it may have a positive effect on glucose metabolism. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10002957/ /pubmed/36911845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3194 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Huang, Lu
Chen, Yan
Wen, Shu
Lu, Danhua
Shen, Xiaoyang
Deng, Hongxia
Xu, Liangzhi
Is time‐restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Is time‐restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Is time‐restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Is time‐restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Is time‐restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Is time‐restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort is time‐restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3194
work_keys_str_mv AT huanglu istimerestrictedeating816beneficialforbodyweightandmetabolismofobeseandoverweightadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenyan istimerestrictedeating816beneficialforbodyweightandmetabolismofobeseandoverweightadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wenshu istimerestrictedeating816beneficialforbodyweightandmetabolismofobeseandoverweightadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ludanhua istimerestrictedeating816beneficialforbodyweightandmetabolismofobeseandoverweightadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shenxiaoyang istimerestrictedeating816beneficialforbodyweightandmetabolismofobeseandoverweightadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT denghongxia istimerestrictedeating816beneficialforbodyweightandmetabolismofobeseandoverweightadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xuliangzhi istimerestrictedeating816beneficialforbodyweightandmetabolismofobeseandoverweightadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials