Cargando…

Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer

Patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (mEG) and tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/Mb (TMB ≥ 10) have more favorable outcomes on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) monotherapy compared with chemotherapy in subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials. We sought to evaluate the robustness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graf, Ryon P., Fisher, Virginia, Creeden, James, Schrock, Alexa B., Ross, Jeffrey S., Nimeiri, Halla, Oxnard, Geoffrey R., Klempner, Samuel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36922935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0161
_version_ 1784906158962638848
author Graf, Ryon P.
Fisher, Virginia
Creeden, James
Schrock, Alexa B.
Ross, Jeffrey S.
Nimeiri, Halla
Oxnard, Geoffrey R.
Klempner, Samuel J.
author_facet Graf, Ryon P.
Fisher, Virginia
Creeden, James
Schrock, Alexa B.
Ross, Jeffrey S.
Nimeiri, Halla
Oxnard, Geoffrey R.
Klempner, Samuel J.
author_sort Graf, Ryon P.
collection PubMed
description Patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (mEG) and tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/Mb (TMB ≥ 10) have more favorable outcomes on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) monotherapy compared with chemotherapy in subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials. We sought to evaluate the robustness of these associations in real-world settings where patients and practices are more diverse. A total of 362 2 L and 692 1 L patients, respectively received ICPI (n = 99, 33) or chemotherapy (n = 263, 659) across approximately 280 U.S. academic or community-based cancer clinics March 2014–July 2021. Deidentified data were captured into a real-world clinico-genomic database. All patients underwent Foundation Medicine testing. Time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) comparing ICPI versus chemotherapy were adjusted for treatment assignment imbalances using propensity scores. 2L: TMB ≥ 10 had more favorable TTNT [median 24 vs. 4.1 months; HR: 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09–0.44; P = 0.0001] and OS (median 43.1 vs. 6.2 months; HR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.011–0.54; P = 0.0005), TMB < 10 did not (P > 0.05). 1L: TMB ≥ 10 had more favorable TTNT (not reached vs. median 4.1 months; HR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03–0.48; P = 0.0024) and OS (not reached vs. median 17.1 months; HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.08–1.14; P = 0.078), TMB < 10 had less favorable TTNT (median 2.8 vs. 6.5 months; HR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.25–4.45; P = 0.008) and OS (median 4.5 vs. 13.1 months; HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.87–3.81; P = 0.11). TMB ≥ 10 robustly identifies patients with mEG with more favorable outcomes on 2 L ICPI monotherapy versus chemotherapy. 1 L data are more limited, but effects are consistent with 2L. SIGNIFICANCE: Using real-world data, we sought to evaluate robustness of these clinical associations using the same assay platform and biomarker cut-off point used in both clinical trials and pan-tumor CDx approvals for later treatment lines. TMB ≥ 10 robustly identified patients with mEG with more favorable outcomes on ICPI monotherapy versus chemotherapy and suggests this subset of patients could be targeted for further trial development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10010289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100102892023-03-14 Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer Graf, Ryon P. Fisher, Virginia Creeden, James Schrock, Alexa B. Ross, Jeffrey S. Nimeiri, Halla Oxnard, Geoffrey R. Klempner, Samuel J. Cancer Res Commun Research Article Patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (mEG) and tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/Mb (TMB ≥ 10) have more favorable outcomes on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) monotherapy compared with chemotherapy in subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials. We sought to evaluate the robustness of these associations in real-world settings where patients and practices are more diverse. A total of 362 2 L and 692 1 L patients, respectively received ICPI (n = 99, 33) or chemotherapy (n = 263, 659) across approximately 280 U.S. academic or community-based cancer clinics March 2014–July 2021. Deidentified data were captured into a real-world clinico-genomic database. All patients underwent Foundation Medicine testing. Time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) comparing ICPI versus chemotherapy were adjusted for treatment assignment imbalances using propensity scores. 2L: TMB ≥ 10 had more favorable TTNT [median 24 vs. 4.1 months; HR: 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09–0.44; P = 0.0001] and OS (median 43.1 vs. 6.2 months; HR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.011–0.54; P = 0.0005), TMB < 10 did not (P > 0.05). 1L: TMB ≥ 10 had more favorable TTNT (not reached vs. median 4.1 months; HR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03–0.48; P = 0.0024) and OS (not reached vs. median 17.1 months; HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.08–1.14; P = 0.078), TMB < 10 had less favorable TTNT (median 2.8 vs. 6.5 months; HR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.25–4.45; P = 0.008) and OS (median 4.5 vs. 13.1 months; HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.87–3.81; P = 0.11). TMB ≥ 10 robustly identifies patients with mEG with more favorable outcomes on 2 L ICPI monotherapy versus chemotherapy. 1 L data are more limited, but effects are consistent with 2L. SIGNIFICANCE: Using real-world data, we sought to evaluate robustness of these clinical associations using the same assay platform and biomarker cut-off point used in both clinical trials and pan-tumor CDx approvals for later treatment lines. TMB ≥ 10 robustly identified patients with mEG with more favorable outcomes on ICPI monotherapy versus chemotherapy and suggests this subset of patients could be targeted for further trial development. American Association for Cancer Research 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10010289/ /pubmed/36922935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0161 Text en © 2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Research Article
Graf, Ryon P.
Fisher, Virginia
Creeden, James
Schrock, Alexa B.
Ross, Jeffrey S.
Nimeiri, Halla
Oxnard, Geoffrey R.
Klempner, Samuel J.
Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer
title Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer
title_full Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer
title_fullStr Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer
title_short Real-world Validation of TMB and Microsatellite Instability as Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Effectiveness in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer
title_sort real-world validation of tmb and microsatellite instability as predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor effectiveness in advanced gastroesophageal cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36922935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0161
work_keys_str_mv AT grafryonp realworldvalidationoftmbandmicrosatelliteinstabilityaspredictivebiomarkersofimmunecheckpointinhibitoreffectivenessinadvancedgastroesophagealcancer
AT fishervirginia realworldvalidationoftmbandmicrosatelliteinstabilityaspredictivebiomarkersofimmunecheckpointinhibitoreffectivenessinadvancedgastroesophagealcancer
AT creedenjames realworldvalidationoftmbandmicrosatelliteinstabilityaspredictivebiomarkersofimmunecheckpointinhibitoreffectivenessinadvancedgastroesophagealcancer
AT schrockalexab realworldvalidationoftmbandmicrosatelliteinstabilityaspredictivebiomarkersofimmunecheckpointinhibitoreffectivenessinadvancedgastroesophagealcancer
AT rossjeffreys realworldvalidationoftmbandmicrosatelliteinstabilityaspredictivebiomarkersofimmunecheckpointinhibitoreffectivenessinadvancedgastroesophagealcancer
AT nimeirihalla realworldvalidationoftmbandmicrosatelliteinstabilityaspredictivebiomarkersofimmunecheckpointinhibitoreffectivenessinadvancedgastroesophagealcancer
AT oxnardgeoffreyr realworldvalidationoftmbandmicrosatelliteinstabilityaspredictivebiomarkersofimmunecheckpointinhibitoreffectivenessinadvancedgastroesophagealcancer
AT klempnersamuelj realworldvalidationoftmbandmicrosatelliteinstabilityaspredictivebiomarkersofimmunecheckpointinhibitoreffectivenessinadvancedgastroesophagealcancer