Cargando…

State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells

SMAD-mediated signaling regulates apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition to safeguard tissue homeostasis. However, it remains elusive how the relatively simple pathway can determine such a broad range of cell fate decisions and how it differentiates between varying li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bohn, Stefan, Hexemer, Lorenz, Huang, Zixin, Strohmaier, Laura, Lenhardt, Sonja, Legewie, Stefan, Loewer, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36857347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210891120
_version_ 1784906838900211712
author Bohn, Stefan
Hexemer, Lorenz
Huang, Zixin
Strohmaier, Laura
Lenhardt, Sonja
Legewie, Stefan
Loewer, Alexander
author_facet Bohn, Stefan
Hexemer, Lorenz
Huang, Zixin
Strohmaier, Laura
Lenhardt, Sonja
Legewie, Stefan
Loewer, Alexander
author_sort Bohn, Stefan
collection PubMed
description SMAD-mediated signaling regulates apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition to safeguard tissue homeostasis. However, it remains elusive how the relatively simple pathway can determine such a broad range of cell fate decisions and how it differentiates between varying ligands. Here, we systematically investigate how SMAD-mediated responses are modulated by various ligands of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) family and compare these ligand responses in quiescent and proliferating MCF10A cells. We find that the nature of the phenotypic response is mainly determined by the proliferation status, with migration and cell cycle arrest being dominant in proliferating cells for all tested TGFβ family ligands, whereas cell death is the major outcome in quiescent cells. In both quiescent and proliferating cells, the identity of the ligand modulates the strength of the phenotypic response proportional to the dynamics of induced SMAD nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation and, as a consequence, the corresponding gene expression changes. Interestingly, the proliferation state of a cell has little impact on the set of genes induced by SMAD signaling; instead, it modulates the relative cellular sensitivity to TGFβ superfamily members. Taken together, diversity of SMAD-mediated responses is mediated by differing cellular states, which determine ligand sensitivity and phenotypic effects, while the pathway itself merely serves as a quantitative relay from the cell membrane to the nucleus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10013741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100137412023-09-01 State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells Bohn, Stefan Hexemer, Lorenz Huang, Zixin Strohmaier, Laura Lenhardt, Sonja Legewie, Stefan Loewer, Alexander Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences SMAD-mediated signaling regulates apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition to safeguard tissue homeostasis. However, it remains elusive how the relatively simple pathway can determine such a broad range of cell fate decisions and how it differentiates between varying ligands. Here, we systematically investigate how SMAD-mediated responses are modulated by various ligands of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) family and compare these ligand responses in quiescent and proliferating MCF10A cells. We find that the nature of the phenotypic response is mainly determined by the proliferation status, with migration and cell cycle arrest being dominant in proliferating cells for all tested TGFβ family ligands, whereas cell death is the major outcome in quiescent cells. In both quiescent and proliferating cells, the identity of the ligand modulates the strength of the phenotypic response proportional to the dynamics of induced SMAD nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation and, as a consequence, the corresponding gene expression changes. Interestingly, the proliferation state of a cell has little impact on the set of genes induced by SMAD signaling; instead, it modulates the relative cellular sensitivity to TGFβ superfamily members. Taken together, diversity of SMAD-mediated responses is mediated by differing cellular states, which determine ligand sensitivity and phenotypic effects, while the pathway itself merely serves as a quantitative relay from the cell membrane to the nucleus. National Academy of Sciences 2023-03-01 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10013741/ /pubmed/36857347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210891120 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Bohn, Stefan
Hexemer, Lorenz
Huang, Zixin
Strohmaier, Laura
Lenhardt, Sonja
Legewie, Stefan
Loewer, Alexander
State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells
title State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells
title_full State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells
title_fullStr State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells
title_full_unstemmed State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells
title_short State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells
title_sort state- and stimulus-specific dynamics of smad signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10013741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36857347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210891120
work_keys_str_mv AT bohnstefan stateandstimulusspecificdynamicsofsmadsignalingdeterminefatedecisionsinindividualcells
AT hexemerlorenz stateandstimulusspecificdynamicsofsmadsignalingdeterminefatedecisionsinindividualcells
AT huangzixin stateandstimulusspecificdynamicsofsmadsignalingdeterminefatedecisionsinindividualcells
AT strohmaierlaura stateandstimulusspecificdynamicsofsmadsignalingdeterminefatedecisionsinindividualcells
AT lenhardtsonja stateandstimulusspecificdynamicsofsmadsignalingdeterminefatedecisionsinindividualcells
AT legewiestefan stateandstimulusspecificdynamicsofsmadsignalingdeterminefatedecisionsinindividualcells
AT loeweralexander stateandstimulusspecificdynamicsofsmadsignalingdeterminefatedecisionsinindividualcells