Cargando…

In vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: A systematic review

Experimental exposure of healthy volunteers to the T‐cell dependent neoantigen keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) permits the evaluation of immunomodulatory investigational medicinal product (IMP) pharmacology prior to the recruitment of patient populations. Despite widespread use, no standardized appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drennan, Philip G., Karponis, Dimitrios, Richards, Duncan, Coles, Mark, Fullerton, James N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13457
_version_ 1784907051899551744
author Drennan, Philip G.
Karponis, Dimitrios
Richards, Duncan
Coles, Mark
Fullerton, James N.
author_facet Drennan, Philip G.
Karponis, Dimitrios
Richards, Duncan
Coles, Mark
Fullerton, James N.
author_sort Drennan, Philip G.
collection PubMed
description Experimental exposure of healthy volunteers to the T‐cell dependent neoantigen keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) permits the evaluation of immunomodulatory investigational medicinal product (IMP) pharmacology prior to the recruitment of patient populations. Despite widespread use, no standardized approach to the design and conduct of such studies has been agreed. The objective of this systematic review was to survey the published literature where KLH was used as a challenge agent, describing methodology, therapeutic targets addressed, and pharmacodynamic outcome measures. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies using KLH challenge in humans between January 1, 1994, and April 1, 2022. We described key study features, including KLH formulation, dose, use of adjuvants, route of administration, co‐administered IMPs, and end points. Of 2421 titles and abstracts screened, 46 met the inclusion criteria, including 14 (31%) early phase trials of IMP, of which 10 (71%) targeted T‐cell co‐stimulation. IMPs with diverse mechanisms demonstrated modulation of the humoral response to KLH, suggesting limited specificity of this end point. Two early phase IMP studies (14%) described the response to intradermal re‐challenge (delayed type hypersensitivity). Challenge regimens for IMP assessment were often incompletely described, and exhibited marked heterogeneity, including primary KLH dose (25‐fold variation: 100–2500 mcg), KLH formulation, and co‐administration with adjuvants. Methodological heterogeneity and failure to exploit the access to tissue‐level mechanism‐relevant end points afforded by KLH challenge has impaired the translational utility of this paradigm to date. Future standardization, characterization, and methodological development is required to permit tailored, appropriately powered, mechanism‐dependent study design to optimize drug development decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10014697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100146972023-03-16 In vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: A systematic review Drennan, Philip G. Karponis, Dimitrios Richards, Duncan Coles, Mark Fullerton, James N. Clin Transl Sci Reviews Experimental exposure of healthy volunteers to the T‐cell dependent neoantigen keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) permits the evaluation of immunomodulatory investigational medicinal product (IMP) pharmacology prior to the recruitment of patient populations. Despite widespread use, no standardized approach to the design and conduct of such studies has been agreed. The objective of this systematic review was to survey the published literature where KLH was used as a challenge agent, describing methodology, therapeutic targets addressed, and pharmacodynamic outcome measures. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies using KLH challenge in humans between January 1, 1994, and April 1, 2022. We described key study features, including KLH formulation, dose, use of adjuvants, route of administration, co‐administered IMPs, and end points. Of 2421 titles and abstracts screened, 46 met the inclusion criteria, including 14 (31%) early phase trials of IMP, of which 10 (71%) targeted T‐cell co‐stimulation. IMPs with diverse mechanisms demonstrated modulation of the humoral response to KLH, suggesting limited specificity of this end point. Two early phase IMP studies (14%) described the response to intradermal re‐challenge (delayed type hypersensitivity). Challenge regimens for IMP assessment were often incompletely described, and exhibited marked heterogeneity, including primary KLH dose (25‐fold variation: 100–2500 mcg), KLH formulation, and co‐administration with adjuvants. Methodological heterogeneity and failure to exploit the access to tissue‐level mechanism‐relevant end points afforded by KLH challenge has impaired the translational utility of this paradigm to date. Future standardization, characterization, and methodological development is required to permit tailored, appropriately powered, mechanism‐dependent study design to optimize drug development decisions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10014697/ /pubmed/36420645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13457 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Drennan, Philip G.
Karponis, Dimitrios
Richards, Duncan
Coles, Mark
Fullerton, James N.
In vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: A systematic review
title In vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: A systematic review
title_full In vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: A systematic review
title_fullStr In vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed In vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: A systematic review
title_short In vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: A systematic review
title_sort in vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13457
work_keys_str_mv AT drennanphilipg invivohumankeyholelimpethemocyaninchallengeinearlyphasedrugdevelopmentasystematicreview
AT karponisdimitrios invivohumankeyholelimpethemocyaninchallengeinearlyphasedrugdevelopmentasystematicreview
AT richardsduncan invivohumankeyholelimpethemocyaninchallengeinearlyphasedrugdevelopmentasystematicreview
AT colesmark invivohumankeyholelimpethemocyaninchallengeinearlyphasedrugdevelopmentasystematicreview
AT fullertonjamesn invivohumankeyholelimpethemocyaninchallengeinearlyphasedrugdevelopmentasystematicreview