Cargando…

Learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study

OBJECTIVES: Augmented reality (AR), which entails overlay of in situ images onto the anatomy, may be a promising technique for assisting image-guided interventions. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the learning experience and performance of untrained operators in puncture of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A., Kubik-Huch, Rahel A., Kolling, Christoph, Leo, Cornelia, Goldhahn, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36350392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09220-5
_version_ 1784907621530075136
author Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A.
Kubik-Huch, Rahel A.
Kolling, Christoph
Leo, Cornelia
Goldhahn, Jörg
author_facet Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A.
Kubik-Huch, Rahel A.
Kolling, Christoph
Leo, Cornelia
Goldhahn, Jörg
author_sort Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Augmented reality (AR), which entails overlay of in situ images onto the anatomy, may be a promising technique for assisting image-guided interventions. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the learning experience and performance of untrained operators in puncture of soft tissue lesions, when using AR ultrasound (AR US) compared with standard US (sUS). METHODS: Forty-four medical students (28 women, 16 men) who had completed a basic US course, but had no experience with AR US, were asked to perform US-guided biopsies with both sUS and AR US, with a randomized selection of the initial modality. The experimental setup aimed to simulate biopsies of superficial soft tissue lesions, such as for example breast masses in clinical practice, by use of a turkey breast containing olives. Time to puncture(s) and success (yes/no) of the biopsies was documented. All participants completed questionnaires about their coordinative skills and their experience during the training. RESULTS: Despite having no experience with the AR technique, time to puncture did not differ significantly between AR US and sUS (median [range]: 17.0 s [6–60] and 14.5 s [5–41], p = 0.16), nor were there any gender-related differences (p = 0.22 and p = 0.50). AR US was considered by 79.5% of the operators to be the more enjoyable means of learning and performing US-guided biopsies. Further, a more favorable learning curve was achieved using AR US. CONCLUSIONS: Students considered AR US to be the preferable and more enjoyable modality for learning how to obtain soft tissue biopsies; however, they did not perform the biopsies faster than when using sUS. KEY POINTS: • Performance of standard and augmented reality US-guided biopsies was comparable • A more favorable learning curve was achieved using augmented reality US. • Augmented reality US was the preferred technique and was considered more enjoyable
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10017581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100175812023-03-17 Learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A. Kubik-Huch, Rahel A. Kolling, Christoph Leo, Cornelia Goldhahn, Jörg Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVES: Augmented reality (AR), which entails overlay of in situ images onto the anatomy, may be a promising technique for assisting image-guided interventions. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the learning experience and performance of untrained operators in puncture of soft tissue lesions, when using AR ultrasound (AR US) compared with standard US (sUS). METHODS: Forty-four medical students (28 women, 16 men) who had completed a basic US course, but had no experience with AR US, were asked to perform US-guided biopsies with both sUS and AR US, with a randomized selection of the initial modality. The experimental setup aimed to simulate biopsies of superficial soft tissue lesions, such as for example breast masses in clinical practice, by use of a turkey breast containing olives. Time to puncture(s) and success (yes/no) of the biopsies was documented. All participants completed questionnaires about their coordinative skills and their experience during the training. RESULTS: Despite having no experience with the AR technique, time to puncture did not differ significantly between AR US and sUS (median [range]: 17.0 s [6–60] and 14.5 s [5–41], p = 0.16), nor were there any gender-related differences (p = 0.22 and p = 0.50). AR US was considered by 79.5% of the operators to be the more enjoyable means of learning and performing US-guided biopsies. Further, a more favorable learning curve was achieved using AR US. CONCLUSIONS: Students considered AR US to be the preferable and more enjoyable modality for learning how to obtain soft tissue biopsies; however, they did not perform the biopsies faster than when using sUS. KEY POINTS: • Performance of standard and augmented reality US-guided biopsies was comparable • A more favorable learning curve was achieved using augmented reality US. • Augmented reality US was the preferred technique and was considered more enjoyable Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10017581/ /pubmed/36350392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09220-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Breast
Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A.
Kubik-Huch, Rahel A.
Kolling, Christoph
Leo, Cornelia
Goldhahn, Jörg
Learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study
title Learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study
title_full Learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study
title_fullStr Learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study
title_short Learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study
title_sort learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36350392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09220-5
work_keys_str_mv AT farshadamackernadjaa learninghowtoperformultrasoundguidedinterventionswithandwithoutaugmentedrealityvisualizationarandomizedstudy
AT kubikhuchrahela learninghowtoperformultrasoundguidedinterventionswithandwithoutaugmentedrealityvisualizationarandomizedstudy
AT kollingchristoph learninghowtoperformultrasoundguidedinterventionswithandwithoutaugmentedrealityvisualizationarandomizedstudy
AT leocornelia learninghowtoperformultrasoundguidedinterventionswithandwithoutaugmentedrealityvisualizationarandomizedstudy
AT goldhahnjorg learninghowtoperformultrasoundguidedinterventionswithandwithoutaugmentedrealityvisualizationarandomizedstudy