Cargando…
Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions
CRISPR nucleases can introduce double-stranded DNA breaks in genomes at positions specified by guide RNAs. When repaired by the cell, this may result in the introduction of insertions and deletions or nucleotide substitutions provided by exogenous DNA donors. However, cellular repair can also result...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1254 |
_version_ | 1784907789668188160 |
---|---|
author | Lackner, Martin Helmbrecht, Nelly Pääbo, Svante Riesenberg, Stephan |
author_facet | Lackner, Martin Helmbrecht, Nelly Pääbo, Svante Riesenberg, Stephan |
author_sort | Lackner, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | CRISPR nucleases can introduce double-stranded DNA breaks in genomes at positions specified by guide RNAs. When repaired by the cell, this may result in the introduction of insertions and deletions or nucleotide substitutions provided by exogenous DNA donors. However, cellular repair can also result in unintended on-target effects, primarily larger deletions and loss of heterozygosity due to gene conversion. Here we present a strategy that allows easy and reliable detection of unintended on-target effects as well as the generation of control cells that carry wild-type alleles but have demonstratively undergone genome editing at the target site. Our ‘sequence-ascertained favorable editing’ (SAFE) donor approach relies on the use of DNA donor mixtures containing the desired nucleotide substitutions or the wild-type alleles together with combinations of additional ‘diagnostic’ substitutions unlikely to have any effects. Sequencing of the target sites then results in that two different sequences are seen when both chromosomes are edited with ‘SAFE’ donors containing different sets of substitutions, while a single sequence indicates unintended effects such as deletions or gene conversion. We analyzed more than 850 human embryonic stem cell clones edited with ‘SAFE’ donors and detect all copy number changes and almost all clones with gene conversion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10018342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100183422023-03-17 Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions Lackner, Martin Helmbrecht, Nelly Pääbo, Svante Riesenberg, Stephan Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online CRISPR nucleases can introduce double-stranded DNA breaks in genomes at positions specified by guide RNAs. When repaired by the cell, this may result in the introduction of insertions and deletions or nucleotide substitutions provided by exogenous DNA donors. However, cellular repair can also result in unintended on-target effects, primarily larger deletions and loss of heterozygosity due to gene conversion. Here we present a strategy that allows easy and reliable detection of unintended on-target effects as well as the generation of control cells that carry wild-type alleles but have demonstratively undergone genome editing at the target site. Our ‘sequence-ascertained favorable editing’ (SAFE) donor approach relies on the use of DNA donor mixtures containing the desired nucleotide substitutions or the wild-type alleles together with combinations of additional ‘diagnostic’ substitutions unlikely to have any effects. Sequencing of the target sites then results in that two different sequences are seen when both chromosomes are edited with ‘SAFE’ donors containing different sets of substitutions, while a single sequence indicates unintended effects such as deletions or gene conversion. We analyzed more than 850 human embryonic stem cell clones edited with ‘SAFE’ donors and detect all copy number changes and almost all clones with gene conversion. Oxford University Press 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10018342/ /pubmed/36620901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1254 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Methods Online Lackner, Martin Helmbrecht, Nelly Pääbo, Svante Riesenberg, Stephan Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions |
title | Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions |
title_full | Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions |
title_fullStr | Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions |
title_short | Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions |
title_sort | detection of unintended on-target effects in crispr genome editing by dna donors carrying diagnostic substitutions |
topic | Methods Online |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lacknermartin detectionofunintendedontargeteffectsincrisprgenomeeditingbydnadonorscarryingdiagnosticsubstitutions AT helmbrechtnelly detectionofunintendedontargeteffectsincrisprgenomeeditingbydnadonorscarryingdiagnosticsubstitutions AT paabosvante detectionofunintendedontargeteffectsincrisprgenomeeditingbydnadonorscarryingdiagnosticsubstitutions AT riesenbergstephan detectionofunintendedontargeteffectsincrisprgenomeeditingbydnadonorscarryingdiagnosticsubstitutions |