Cargando…
Interdisciplinary education affects student learning: a focus group study
BACKGROUND: In order to best prepare medical students for their increasingly complex future career, interdisciplinary higher education is swiftly gaining popularity. However, the implementation of interdisciplinary learning in medical education is challenging. The present study deepens the understan...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04103-9 |
_version_ | 1784909093728681984 |
---|---|
author | Oudenampsen, Jessica van de Pol, Marjolein Blijlevens, Nicole Das, Enny |
author_facet | Oudenampsen, Jessica van de Pol, Marjolein Blijlevens, Nicole Das, Enny |
author_sort | Oudenampsen, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In order to best prepare medical students for their increasingly complex future career, interdisciplinary higher education is swiftly gaining popularity. However, the implementation of interdisciplinary learning in medical education is challenging. The present study deepens the understanding of the challenges and opportunities inherent to the implementation of an interdisciplinary course. We elucidated the attitudes and beliefs of students participating in a newly developed interdisciplinary minor, in which students of medicine (MS) and communication and information sciences (CISS) were involved. METHODS: We conducted four semi-structured focus group interviews, of which two were held before, and two were held after the course. Seven MS and six CISS participated voluntarily. A pre-arranged interview guide was used. The interviews were recorded and afterwards systematically analyzed with the ‘constant comparative analysis’ technique. RESULTS: The focus group interviews revealed three differences in epistemics between students in terms of 1) curriculum content, 2) educational formats and 3) student’s competence perceptions. These factors influenced the way students evaluated themselves, each other and the interdisciplinary course. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that factors that influence interdisciplinary learning are personal epistemics, individual learning preferences, and the synergy that is achieved throughout interdisciplinary learning. Organizing the dialogue among students of different disciplines could make students aware of inequalities, implicated biases and assigned status of different student groups. These empirical results are crucial to tailor interdisciplinary education to each specific discipline and to take interdisciplinary learning to a higher level of maturity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04103-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10024401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100244012023-03-19 Interdisciplinary education affects student learning: a focus group study Oudenampsen, Jessica van de Pol, Marjolein Blijlevens, Nicole Das, Enny BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: In order to best prepare medical students for their increasingly complex future career, interdisciplinary higher education is swiftly gaining popularity. However, the implementation of interdisciplinary learning in medical education is challenging. The present study deepens the understanding of the challenges and opportunities inherent to the implementation of an interdisciplinary course. We elucidated the attitudes and beliefs of students participating in a newly developed interdisciplinary minor, in which students of medicine (MS) and communication and information sciences (CISS) were involved. METHODS: We conducted four semi-structured focus group interviews, of which two were held before, and two were held after the course. Seven MS and six CISS participated voluntarily. A pre-arranged interview guide was used. The interviews were recorded and afterwards systematically analyzed with the ‘constant comparative analysis’ technique. RESULTS: The focus group interviews revealed three differences in epistemics between students in terms of 1) curriculum content, 2) educational formats and 3) student’s competence perceptions. These factors influenced the way students evaluated themselves, each other and the interdisciplinary course. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that factors that influence interdisciplinary learning are personal epistemics, individual learning preferences, and the synergy that is achieved throughout interdisciplinary learning. Organizing the dialogue among students of different disciplines could make students aware of inequalities, implicated biases and assigned status of different student groups. These empirical results are crucial to tailor interdisciplinary education to each specific discipline and to take interdisciplinary learning to a higher level of maturity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04103-9. BioMed Central 2023-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10024401/ /pubmed/36934239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04103-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Oudenampsen, Jessica van de Pol, Marjolein Blijlevens, Nicole Das, Enny Interdisciplinary education affects student learning: a focus group study |
title | Interdisciplinary education affects student learning: a focus group study |
title_full | Interdisciplinary education affects student learning: a focus group study |
title_fullStr | Interdisciplinary education affects student learning: a focus group study |
title_full_unstemmed | Interdisciplinary education affects student learning: a focus group study |
title_short | Interdisciplinary education affects student learning: a focus group study |
title_sort | interdisciplinary education affects student learning: a focus group study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36934239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04103-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oudenampsenjessica interdisciplinaryeducationaffectsstudentlearningafocusgroupstudy AT vandepolmarjolein interdisciplinaryeducationaffectsstudentlearningafocusgroupstudy AT blijlevensnicole interdisciplinaryeducationaffectsstudentlearningafocusgroupstudy AT dasenny interdisciplinaryeducationaffectsstudentlearningafocusgroupstudy |