Cargando…

Standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi study

BACKGROUND: The lack of standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing programmes hampers the evaluation of e-learning programmes in low- and middle-income countries. Fragmented approaches to evaluation coupled with a lack of uniform criteria have been a major deterrent to the growth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulu, Moses Mutua, Nyoni, Champion N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36935508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01235-7
_version_ 1784909243201093632
author Mulu, Moses Mutua
Nyoni, Champion N.
author_facet Mulu, Moses Mutua
Nyoni, Champion N.
author_sort Mulu, Moses Mutua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The lack of standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing programmes hampers the evaluation of e-learning programmes in low- and middle-income countries. Fragmented approaches to evaluation coupled with a lack of uniform criteria have been a major deterrent to the growth of e-learning. Adopting standards from high-income countries has contextual challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Holistic approaches coupled with uniform standards provide information to stakeholders hence the quality of the programmes is measurable. The e-learning situation in low-and middle-income countries provided an impetus to develop and validate these standards. DESIGN: A modified Delphi technique. REVIEW METHODS: Fourteen experts with experience and expertise in e-learning and regulation of undergraduate nursing from fourteen countries from LMICs participated in three rounds of the modified Delphi process. A pre-described set of standards was shared electronically for independent and blinded ratings. An 80% threshold was set for consensus decisions. The standards were modified based on experts’ comments, and two subsequent rounds were used to refine the standards and criteria. RESULTS: At the end of round one, the expert consensus was to keep 67, modify 39 and remove three criteria. At the end of the second round, the consensus was to modify 38 and remove one criteria. In the third round, experts agreed that the standards were feasible, usable, and practical in LMICs. A total of six broad standards with 104 criteria were developed. CONCLUSION: The Technological bloom permeating all spheres of society, including education is an essential component in the development of e-learning programmes. E-learning in nursing education requires critical evaluation to ensure quality in undergraduate nursing programmes. The intricacies of the Low and middle-income context were taken into consideration in developing the standards to offer sustainable evaluation of the quality of e-learning in LMICs, and local solutions to local problems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01235-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10025059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100250592023-03-21 Standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi study Mulu, Moses Mutua Nyoni, Champion N. BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: The lack of standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing programmes hampers the evaluation of e-learning programmes in low- and middle-income countries. Fragmented approaches to evaluation coupled with a lack of uniform criteria have been a major deterrent to the growth of e-learning. Adopting standards from high-income countries has contextual challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Holistic approaches coupled with uniform standards provide information to stakeholders hence the quality of the programmes is measurable. The e-learning situation in low-and middle-income countries provided an impetus to develop and validate these standards. DESIGN: A modified Delphi technique. REVIEW METHODS: Fourteen experts with experience and expertise in e-learning and regulation of undergraduate nursing from fourteen countries from LMICs participated in three rounds of the modified Delphi process. A pre-described set of standards was shared electronically for independent and blinded ratings. An 80% threshold was set for consensus decisions. The standards were modified based on experts’ comments, and two subsequent rounds were used to refine the standards and criteria. RESULTS: At the end of round one, the expert consensus was to keep 67, modify 39 and remove three criteria. At the end of the second round, the consensus was to modify 38 and remove one criteria. In the third round, experts agreed that the standards were feasible, usable, and practical in LMICs. A total of six broad standards with 104 criteria were developed. CONCLUSION: The Technological bloom permeating all spheres of society, including education is an essential component in the development of e-learning programmes. E-learning in nursing education requires critical evaluation to ensure quality in undergraduate nursing programmes. The intricacies of the Low and middle-income context were taken into consideration in developing the standards to offer sustainable evaluation of the quality of e-learning in LMICs, and local solutions to local problems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01235-7. BioMed Central 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10025059/ /pubmed/36935508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01235-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mulu, Moses Mutua
Nyoni, Champion N.
Standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi study
title Standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi study
title_full Standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi study
title_fullStr Standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi study
title_short Standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi study
title_sort standards for evaluating the quality of undergraduate nursing e-learning programme in low- and middle-income countries: a modified delphi study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10025059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36935508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01235-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mulumosesmutua standardsforevaluatingthequalityofundergraduatenursingelearningprogrammeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesamodifieddelphistudy
AT nyonichampionn standardsforevaluatingthequalityofundergraduatenursingelearningprogrammeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesamodifieddelphistudy