Cargando…

Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review

PURPOSE: The goal of this systematic review was to examine self-directed learning (SDL) assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education. METHODS: Seven electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) to retrieve English-langu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Tracey A.H., Kemp, Kyeorda, Mi, Misa, Lerchenfeldt, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36919556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2189553
_version_ 1784909584571301888
author Taylor, Tracey A.H.
Kemp, Kyeorda
Mi, Misa
Lerchenfeldt, Sarah
author_facet Taylor, Tracey A.H.
Kemp, Kyeorda
Mi, Misa
Lerchenfeldt, Sarah
author_sort Taylor, Tracey A.H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of this systematic review was to examine self-directed learning (SDL) assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education. METHODS: Seven electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) to retrieve English-language articles published between 2015 and July of 2022, investigating assessment of SDL learning outcomes. Extracted data included the sample size, field of study, study design, SDL activity type, SDL assessment method, number of SDL assessments used, study quality, number of SDL components present utilising the framework the authors developed, and SDL activity outcomes. We also assessed relationships between SDL assessment method and number of SDL components, study quality, field of study, and study outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 141 studies included, the majority of study participants were medical (51.8%) or nursing (34.8%) students. The most common SDL assessment method used was internally-developed perception surveys (49.6%). When evaluating outcomes for SDL activities, most studies reported a positive or mixed/neutral outcome (58.2% and 34.8%, respectively). There was a statistically significant relationship between both number and type of assessments used, and study quality, with knowledge assessments (median-IQR 11.5) being associated with higher study quality (p < 0.001). Less than half (48.9%) of the studies used more than one assessment method to evaluate the effectiveness of SDL activities. Having more than one assessment (mean 9.49) was associated with higher quality study (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our systematic review suggest that SDL assessment practices within undergraduate health professions education vary greatly, as different aspects of SDL were leveraged and implemented by diverse groups of learners to meet different learning needs and professional accreditation requirements. Evidence-based best practices for the assessment of SDL across undergraduate healthcare professions education should include the use of multiple assessments, with direct and indirect measures, to more accurately assess student performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10026772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100267722023-03-21 Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review Taylor, Tracey A.H. Kemp, Kyeorda Mi, Misa Lerchenfeldt, Sarah Med Educ Online Review Article PURPOSE: The goal of this systematic review was to examine self-directed learning (SDL) assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education. METHODS: Seven electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) to retrieve English-language articles published between 2015 and July of 2022, investigating assessment of SDL learning outcomes. Extracted data included the sample size, field of study, study design, SDL activity type, SDL assessment method, number of SDL assessments used, study quality, number of SDL components present utilising the framework the authors developed, and SDL activity outcomes. We also assessed relationships between SDL assessment method and number of SDL components, study quality, field of study, and study outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 141 studies included, the majority of study participants were medical (51.8%) or nursing (34.8%) students. The most common SDL assessment method used was internally-developed perception surveys (49.6%). When evaluating outcomes for SDL activities, most studies reported a positive or mixed/neutral outcome (58.2% and 34.8%, respectively). There was a statistically significant relationship between both number and type of assessments used, and study quality, with knowledge assessments (median-IQR 11.5) being associated with higher study quality (p < 0.001). Less than half (48.9%) of the studies used more than one assessment method to evaluate the effectiveness of SDL activities. Having more than one assessment (mean 9.49) was associated with higher quality study (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our systematic review suggest that SDL assessment practices within undergraduate health professions education vary greatly, as different aspects of SDL were leveraged and implemented by diverse groups of learners to meet different learning needs and professional accreditation requirements. Evidence-based best practices for the assessment of SDL across undergraduate healthcare professions education should include the use of multiple assessments, with direct and indirect measures, to more accurately assess student performance. Taylor & Francis 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10026772/ /pubmed/36919556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2189553 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Review Article
Taylor, Tracey A.H.
Kemp, Kyeorda
Mi, Misa
Lerchenfeldt, Sarah
Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review
title Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review
title_full Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review
title_fullStr Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review
title_short Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review
title_sort self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10026772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36919556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2189553
work_keys_str_mv AT taylortraceyah selfdirectedlearningassessmentpracticesinundergraduatehealthprofessionseducationasystematicreview
AT kempkyeorda selfdirectedlearningassessmentpracticesinundergraduatehealthprofessionseducationasystematicreview
AT mimisa selfdirectedlearningassessmentpracticesinundergraduatehealthprofessionseducationasystematicreview
AT lerchenfeldtsarah selfdirectedlearningassessmentpracticesinundergraduatehealthprofessionseducationasystematicreview