Cargando…
Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex
[Image: see text] Allosteric modulators (AMs) are considered as a perpetual hotspot in research for their higher selectivity and various effects on orthosteric ligands (OL). They are classified in terms of their functionalities as positive, negative, or silent allosteric modulators (PAM, NAM, or SAM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00554 |
_version_ | 1784910831227502592 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Chen He, Xibing Wang, Yuanqiang Chen, Chih-Jung Othman, Yasmin Hao, Yixuan Yuan, Jiayi Xie, Xiang-Qun Feng, Zhiwei |
author_facet | Jiang, Chen He, Xibing Wang, Yuanqiang Chen, Chih-Jung Othman, Yasmin Hao, Yixuan Yuan, Jiayi Xie, Xiang-Qun Feng, Zhiwei |
author_sort | Jiang, Chen |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Allosteric modulators (AMs) are considered as a perpetual hotspot in research for their higher selectivity and various effects on orthosteric ligands (OL). They are classified in terms of their functionalities as positive, negative, or silent allosteric modulators (PAM, NAM, or SAM, respectively). In the present work, 11 pairs of three-dimensional (3D) structures of receptor–orthosteric ligand and receptor–orthosteric ligand–allosteric modulator complexes have been collected for the studies, including three different systems: GPCR, enzyme, and ion channel. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are applied to quantify the dynamic interactions in both the orthosteric and allosteric binding pockets and the structural fluctuation of the involved proteins. Our results showed that MD simulations of moderately large molecules or peptides undergo insignificant changes compared to crystal structure results. Furthermore, we also studied the conformational changes of receptors that bound with PAM and NAM, as well as the different allosteric binding sites in a receptor. There should be no preference for the position of the allosteric binding pocket after comparing the allosteric binding pockets of these three systems. Finally, we aligned four distinct β2 adrenoceptor structures and three N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) structures to investigate conformational changes. In the β2 adrenoceptor systems, the aligned results revealed that transmembrane (TM) helices 1, 5, and 6 gradually increased outward movement from an enhanced inactive state to an improved active state. TM6 endured the most significant conformational changes (around 11 Å). For NMDAR, the bottom section of NMDAR’s ligand-binding domain (LBD) experienced an upward and outward shift during the gradually activating process. In conclusion, our research provides insight into receptor–orthosteric ligand–allosteric modulator studies and the design and development of allosteric modulator drugs using MD simulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10032570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100325702023-03-23 Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex Jiang, Chen He, Xibing Wang, Yuanqiang Chen, Chih-Jung Othman, Yasmin Hao, Yixuan Yuan, Jiayi Xie, Xiang-Qun Feng, Zhiwei ACS Chem Neurosci [Image: see text] Allosteric modulators (AMs) are considered as a perpetual hotspot in research for their higher selectivity and various effects on orthosteric ligands (OL). They are classified in terms of their functionalities as positive, negative, or silent allosteric modulators (PAM, NAM, or SAM, respectively). In the present work, 11 pairs of three-dimensional (3D) structures of receptor–orthosteric ligand and receptor–orthosteric ligand–allosteric modulator complexes have been collected for the studies, including three different systems: GPCR, enzyme, and ion channel. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are applied to quantify the dynamic interactions in both the orthosteric and allosteric binding pockets and the structural fluctuation of the involved proteins. Our results showed that MD simulations of moderately large molecules or peptides undergo insignificant changes compared to crystal structure results. Furthermore, we also studied the conformational changes of receptors that bound with PAM and NAM, as well as the different allosteric binding sites in a receptor. There should be no preference for the position of the allosteric binding pocket after comparing the allosteric binding pockets of these three systems. Finally, we aligned four distinct β2 adrenoceptor structures and three N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) structures to investigate conformational changes. In the β2 adrenoceptor systems, the aligned results revealed that transmembrane (TM) helices 1, 5, and 6 gradually increased outward movement from an enhanced inactive state to an improved active state. TM6 endured the most significant conformational changes (around 11 Å). For NMDAR, the bottom section of NMDAR’s ligand-binding domain (LBD) experienced an upward and outward shift during the gradually activating process. In conclusion, our research provides insight into receptor–orthosteric ligand–allosteric modulator studies and the design and development of allosteric modulator drugs using MD simulation. American Chemical Society 2023-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10032570/ /pubmed/36692197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00554 Text en © 2023 American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Jiang, Chen He, Xibing Wang, Yuanqiang Chen, Chih-Jung Othman, Yasmin Hao, Yixuan Yuan, Jiayi Xie, Xiang-Qun Feng, Zhiwei Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex |
title | Molecular Modeling
Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric
Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex |
title_full | Molecular Modeling
Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric
Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex |
title_fullStr | Molecular Modeling
Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric
Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular Modeling
Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric
Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex |
title_short | Molecular Modeling
Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric
Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex |
title_sort | molecular modeling
study of a receptor–orthosteric
ligand–allosteric modulator signaling complex |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangchen molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex AT hexibing molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex AT wangyuanqiang molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex AT chenchihjung molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex AT othmanyasmin molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex AT haoyixuan molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex AT yuanjiayi molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex AT xiexiangqun molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex AT fengzhiwei molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex |