Cargando…

Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex

[Image: see text] Allosteric modulators (AMs) are considered as a perpetual hotspot in research for their higher selectivity and various effects on orthosteric ligands (OL). They are classified in terms of their functionalities as positive, negative, or silent allosteric modulators (PAM, NAM, or SAM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Chen, He, Xibing, Wang, Yuanqiang, Chen, Chih-Jung, Othman, Yasmin, Hao, Yixuan, Yuan, Jiayi, Xie, Xiang-Qun, Feng, Zhiwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00554
_version_ 1784910831227502592
author Jiang, Chen
He, Xibing
Wang, Yuanqiang
Chen, Chih-Jung
Othman, Yasmin
Hao, Yixuan
Yuan, Jiayi
Xie, Xiang-Qun
Feng, Zhiwei
author_facet Jiang, Chen
He, Xibing
Wang, Yuanqiang
Chen, Chih-Jung
Othman, Yasmin
Hao, Yixuan
Yuan, Jiayi
Xie, Xiang-Qun
Feng, Zhiwei
author_sort Jiang, Chen
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Allosteric modulators (AMs) are considered as a perpetual hotspot in research for their higher selectivity and various effects on orthosteric ligands (OL). They are classified in terms of their functionalities as positive, negative, or silent allosteric modulators (PAM, NAM, or SAM, respectively). In the present work, 11 pairs of three-dimensional (3D) structures of receptor–orthosteric ligand and receptor–orthosteric ligand–allosteric modulator complexes have been collected for the studies, including three different systems: GPCR, enzyme, and ion channel. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are applied to quantify the dynamic interactions in both the orthosteric and allosteric binding pockets and the structural fluctuation of the involved proteins. Our results showed that MD simulations of moderately large molecules or peptides undergo insignificant changes compared to crystal structure results. Furthermore, we also studied the conformational changes of receptors that bound with PAM and NAM, as well as the different allosteric binding sites in a receptor. There should be no preference for the position of the allosteric binding pocket after comparing the allosteric binding pockets of these three systems. Finally, we aligned four distinct β2 adrenoceptor structures and three N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) structures to investigate conformational changes. In the β2 adrenoceptor systems, the aligned results revealed that transmembrane (TM) helices 1, 5, and 6 gradually increased outward movement from an enhanced inactive state to an improved active state. TM6 endured the most significant conformational changes (around 11 Å). For NMDAR, the bottom section of NMDAR’s ligand-binding domain (LBD) experienced an upward and outward shift during the gradually activating process. In conclusion, our research provides insight into receptor–orthosteric ligand–allosteric modulator studies and the design and development of allosteric modulator drugs using MD simulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10032570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100325702023-03-23 Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex Jiang, Chen He, Xibing Wang, Yuanqiang Chen, Chih-Jung Othman, Yasmin Hao, Yixuan Yuan, Jiayi Xie, Xiang-Qun Feng, Zhiwei ACS Chem Neurosci [Image: see text] Allosteric modulators (AMs) are considered as a perpetual hotspot in research for their higher selectivity and various effects on orthosteric ligands (OL). They are classified in terms of their functionalities as positive, negative, or silent allosteric modulators (PAM, NAM, or SAM, respectively). In the present work, 11 pairs of three-dimensional (3D) structures of receptor–orthosteric ligand and receptor–orthosteric ligand–allosteric modulator complexes have been collected for the studies, including three different systems: GPCR, enzyme, and ion channel. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are applied to quantify the dynamic interactions in both the orthosteric and allosteric binding pockets and the structural fluctuation of the involved proteins. Our results showed that MD simulations of moderately large molecules or peptides undergo insignificant changes compared to crystal structure results. Furthermore, we also studied the conformational changes of receptors that bound with PAM and NAM, as well as the different allosteric binding sites in a receptor. There should be no preference for the position of the allosteric binding pocket after comparing the allosteric binding pockets of these three systems. Finally, we aligned four distinct β2 adrenoceptor structures and three N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) structures to investigate conformational changes. In the β2 adrenoceptor systems, the aligned results revealed that transmembrane (TM) helices 1, 5, and 6 gradually increased outward movement from an enhanced inactive state to an improved active state. TM6 endured the most significant conformational changes (around 11 Å). For NMDAR, the bottom section of NMDAR’s ligand-binding domain (LBD) experienced an upward and outward shift during the gradually activating process. In conclusion, our research provides insight into receptor–orthosteric ligand–allosteric modulator studies and the design and development of allosteric modulator drugs using MD simulation. American Chemical Society 2023-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10032570/ /pubmed/36692197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00554 Text en © 2023 American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Jiang, Chen
He, Xibing
Wang, Yuanqiang
Chen, Chih-Jung
Othman, Yasmin
Hao, Yixuan
Yuan, Jiayi
Xie, Xiang-Qun
Feng, Zhiwei
Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex
title Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex
title_full Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex
title_fullStr Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex
title_short Molecular Modeling Study of a Receptor–Orthosteric Ligand–Allosteric Modulator Signaling Complex
title_sort molecular modeling study of a receptor–orthosteric ligand–allosteric modulator signaling complex
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00554
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangchen molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex
AT hexibing molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex
AT wangyuanqiang molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex
AT chenchihjung molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex
AT othmanyasmin molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex
AT haoyixuan molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex
AT yuanjiayi molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex
AT xiexiangqun molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex
AT fengzhiwei molecularmodelingstudyofareceptororthostericligandallostericmodulatorsignalingcomplex