Cargando…

Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks

BACKGROUND: Patient involvement in postgraduate medical education (PGME) can help residents improve their communication, professionalism, and collaboration. The CanMEDS Framework defines such competencies for physicians and informs teaching and assessment activities in PGME. However, it is unclear h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adam, Holly L, Eady, Kaylee, Moreau, Katherine A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Medical Education Journal 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998493
http://dx.doi.org/10.36834/cmej.74993
_version_ 1784913009158651904
author Adam, Holly L
Eady, Kaylee
Moreau, Katherine A
author_facet Adam, Holly L
Eady, Kaylee
Moreau, Katherine A
author_sort Adam, Holly L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient involvement in postgraduate medical education (PGME) can help residents improve their communication, professionalism, and collaboration. The CanMEDS Framework defines such competencies for physicians and informs teaching and assessment activities in PGME. However, it is unclear how patients are referenced in the CanMEDS Framework and if these references encourage the active involvement of patients in PGME. To inform how patients are referenced in the revisions of the CanMEDS Framework, scheduled for publication in 2025, our aim was to determine how patients are referenced in each the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS Frameworks. METHODS: We used document analysis to examine how the term ‘patient(s)’ is referenced in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS Frameworks. RESULTS: Several 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS Roles include patients in the descriptions but do not reference them in the competencies. Others do not reference patients in the descriptions or competencies, potentially detracting from the importance of involving patients. As it stands, the 2015 Health Advocate is the only Role that describes and references patients working with physicians as partners in care, facilitating potential opportunities for patient involvement in PGME. CONCLUSION: There are inconsistencies in how patients are described and referenced as potential partners in PGME throughout past and present CanMEDS Frameworks. Understanding these inconsistencies can inform the revision of CanMEDS that is scheduled for publication in 2025.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10042792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Canadian Medical Education Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100427922023-03-29 Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks Adam, Holly L Eady, Kaylee Moreau, Katherine A Can Med Educ J Original Research BACKGROUND: Patient involvement in postgraduate medical education (PGME) can help residents improve their communication, professionalism, and collaboration. The CanMEDS Framework defines such competencies for physicians and informs teaching and assessment activities in PGME. However, it is unclear how patients are referenced in the CanMEDS Framework and if these references encourage the active involvement of patients in PGME. To inform how patients are referenced in the revisions of the CanMEDS Framework, scheduled for publication in 2025, our aim was to determine how patients are referenced in each the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS Frameworks. METHODS: We used document analysis to examine how the term ‘patient(s)’ is referenced in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS Frameworks. RESULTS: Several 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS Roles include patients in the descriptions but do not reference them in the competencies. Others do not reference patients in the descriptions or competencies, potentially detracting from the importance of involving patients. As it stands, the 2015 Health Advocate is the only Role that describes and references patients working with physicians as partners in care, facilitating potential opportunities for patient involvement in PGME. CONCLUSION: There are inconsistencies in how patients are described and referenced as potential partners in PGME throughout past and present CanMEDS Frameworks. Understanding these inconsistencies can inform the revision of CanMEDS that is scheduled for publication in 2025. Canadian Medical Education Journal 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10042792/ /pubmed/36998493 http://dx.doi.org/10.36834/cmej.74993 Text en © 2023 Adam, Eady, Moreau; licensee Synergies Partners. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Journal Systems article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Adam, Holly L
Eady, Kaylee
Moreau, Katherine A
Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks
title Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks
title_full Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks
title_fullStr Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks
title_full_unstemmed Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks
title_short Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks
title_sort patient references in the 2005 and 2015 canmeds frameworks
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998493
http://dx.doi.org/10.36834/cmej.74993
work_keys_str_mv AT adamhollyl patientreferencesinthe2005and2015canmedsframeworks
AT eadykaylee patientreferencesinthe2005and2015canmedsframeworks
AT moreaukatherinea patientreferencesinthe2005and2015canmedsframeworks