Cargando…

Comparing (13)C methyl and deuterated methyl isotopic labeling for the quantification of methyl cellulose patterns using mass spectrometry

The methyl substitution along and among the polymer chains of methyl cellulose (MC) is commonly analyzed by ESI-MS after perdeuteromethylation of the free-OH groups and partial hydrolysis to cello-oligosaccharides (COS). This method requires a correct quantification of the molar ratios of the consti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schleicher, Sarah, O’Connor, Gavin, Mischnick, Petra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36867199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04622-w
_version_ 1785014592658735104
author Schleicher, Sarah
O’Connor, Gavin
Mischnick, Petra
author_facet Schleicher, Sarah
O’Connor, Gavin
Mischnick, Petra
author_sort Schleicher, Sarah
collection PubMed
description The methyl substitution along and among the polymer chains of methyl cellulose (MC) is commonly analyzed by ESI-MS after perdeuteromethylation of the free-OH groups and partial hydrolysis to cello-oligosaccharides (COS). This method requires a correct quantification of the molar ratios of the constituents belonging to a particular degree of polymerization (DP). However, isotopic effects are most pronounced for H/D since their mass difference is 100%. Therefore, we investigated whether more precise and accurate results could be obtained for the methyl distribution of MC by MS of (13)CH(3) instead of CD(3)-etherified O-Me-COS. Internal isotope labeling with (13)CH(3) makes the COS of each DP chemically and physically much more similar, reducing mass fractionation effects, but at the same time requires more complex isotopic correction for evaluation. Results from syringe pump infusion ESI-TOF-MS with (13)CH(3) and CD(3) as isotope label were equal. However, in the case of LC-MS with a gradient system, (13)CH(3) was superior to CD(3). In the case of CD(3), the occurrence of a partial separation of the isotopologs of a particular DP resulted in slight distortion of the methyl distribution since the signal response is significantly dependent on the solvent composition. Isocratic LC levels this problem, but one particular eluent-composition is not sufficient for a series of oligosaccharides with increasing DP due to peak broadening. In summary, (13)CH(3) is more robust to determine the methyl distribution of MCs. Both syringe pump and gradient-LC-MS measurements are possible, and the more complex isotope correction is not a disadvantage. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-023-04622-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10050035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100500352023-03-30 Comparing (13)C methyl and deuterated methyl isotopic labeling for the quantification of methyl cellulose patterns using mass spectrometry Schleicher, Sarah O’Connor, Gavin Mischnick, Petra Anal Bioanal Chem Paper in Forefront The methyl substitution along and among the polymer chains of methyl cellulose (MC) is commonly analyzed by ESI-MS after perdeuteromethylation of the free-OH groups and partial hydrolysis to cello-oligosaccharides (COS). This method requires a correct quantification of the molar ratios of the constituents belonging to a particular degree of polymerization (DP). However, isotopic effects are most pronounced for H/D since their mass difference is 100%. Therefore, we investigated whether more precise and accurate results could be obtained for the methyl distribution of MC by MS of (13)CH(3) instead of CD(3)-etherified O-Me-COS. Internal isotope labeling with (13)CH(3) makes the COS of each DP chemically and physically much more similar, reducing mass fractionation effects, but at the same time requires more complex isotopic correction for evaluation. Results from syringe pump infusion ESI-TOF-MS with (13)CH(3) and CD(3) as isotope label were equal. However, in the case of LC-MS with a gradient system, (13)CH(3) was superior to CD(3). In the case of CD(3), the occurrence of a partial separation of the isotopologs of a particular DP resulted in slight distortion of the methyl distribution since the signal response is significantly dependent on the solvent composition. Isocratic LC levels this problem, but one particular eluent-composition is not sufficient for a series of oligosaccharides with increasing DP due to peak broadening. In summary, (13)CH(3) is more robust to determine the methyl distribution of MCs. Both syringe pump and gradient-LC-MS measurements are possible, and the more complex isotope correction is not a disadvantage. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-023-04622-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10050035/ /pubmed/36867199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04622-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Paper in Forefront
Schleicher, Sarah
O’Connor, Gavin
Mischnick, Petra
Comparing (13)C methyl and deuterated methyl isotopic labeling for the quantification of methyl cellulose patterns using mass spectrometry
title Comparing (13)C methyl and deuterated methyl isotopic labeling for the quantification of methyl cellulose patterns using mass spectrometry
title_full Comparing (13)C methyl and deuterated methyl isotopic labeling for the quantification of methyl cellulose patterns using mass spectrometry
title_fullStr Comparing (13)C methyl and deuterated methyl isotopic labeling for the quantification of methyl cellulose patterns using mass spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Comparing (13)C methyl and deuterated methyl isotopic labeling for the quantification of methyl cellulose patterns using mass spectrometry
title_short Comparing (13)C methyl and deuterated methyl isotopic labeling for the quantification of methyl cellulose patterns using mass spectrometry
title_sort comparing (13)c methyl and deuterated methyl isotopic labeling for the quantification of methyl cellulose patterns using mass spectrometry
topic Paper in Forefront
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36867199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04622-w
work_keys_str_mv AT schleichersarah comparing13cmethylanddeuteratedmethylisotopiclabelingforthequantificationofmethylcellulosepatternsusingmassspectrometry
AT oconnorgavin comparing13cmethylanddeuteratedmethylisotopiclabelingforthequantificationofmethylcellulosepatternsusingmassspectrometry
AT mischnickpetra comparing13cmethylanddeuteratedmethylisotopiclabelingforthequantificationofmethylcellulosepatternsusingmassspectrometry