Cargando…
Reduced replication but increased interferon resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1
The IFN system constitutes a powerful antiviral defense machinery. Consequently, effective IFN responses protect against severe COVID-19 and exogenous IFNs inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. However, emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) may have evolved reduced IFN sensitivity. Here, we determin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Life Science Alliance LLC
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977594 http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202201745 |
_version_ | 1785015409361027072 |
---|---|
author | Nchioua, Rayhane Schundner, Annika Klute, Susanne Koepke, Lennart Hirschenberger, Maximilian Noettger, Sabrina Fois, Giorgio Zech, Fabian Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Braubach, Peter Blum, Helmut Stenger, Steffen Kmiec, Dorota Frick, Manfred Kirchhoff, Frank Sparrer, Konstantin MJ |
author_facet | Nchioua, Rayhane Schundner, Annika Klute, Susanne Koepke, Lennart Hirschenberger, Maximilian Noettger, Sabrina Fois, Giorgio Zech, Fabian Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Braubach, Peter Blum, Helmut Stenger, Steffen Kmiec, Dorota Frick, Manfred Kirchhoff, Frank Sparrer, Konstantin MJ |
author_sort | Nchioua, Rayhane |
collection | PubMed |
description | The IFN system constitutes a powerful antiviral defense machinery. Consequently, effective IFN responses protect against severe COVID-19 and exogenous IFNs inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. However, emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) may have evolved reduced IFN sensitivity. Here, we determined differences in replication and IFN susceptibility of an early SARS-CoV-2 isolate (NL-02-2020) and the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron VOCs in Calu-3 cells, iPSC-derived alveolar type-II cells (iAT2) and air–liquid interface (ALI) cultures of primary human airway epithelial cells. Our data show that Alpha, Beta, and Gamma replicated to similar levels as NL-02-2020. In comparison, Delta consistently yielded higher viral RNA levels, whereas Omicron was attenuated. All viruses were inhibited by type-I, -II, and -III IFNs, albeit to varying extend. Overall, Alpha was slightly less sensitive to IFNs than NL-02-2020, whereas Beta, Gamma, and Delta remained fully sensitive. Strikingly, Omicron BA.1 was least restricted by exogenous IFNs in all cell models. Our results suggest that enhanced innate immune evasion rather than higher replication capacity contributed to the effective spread of Omicron BA.1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10053418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Life Science Alliance LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100534182023-03-30 Reduced replication but increased interferon resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 Nchioua, Rayhane Schundner, Annika Klute, Susanne Koepke, Lennart Hirschenberger, Maximilian Noettger, Sabrina Fois, Giorgio Zech, Fabian Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Braubach, Peter Blum, Helmut Stenger, Steffen Kmiec, Dorota Frick, Manfred Kirchhoff, Frank Sparrer, Konstantin MJ Life Sci Alliance Research Articles The IFN system constitutes a powerful antiviral defense machinery. Consequently, effective IFN responses protect against severe COVID-19 and exogenous IFNs inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. However, emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) may have evolved reduced IFN sensitivity. Here, we determined differences in replication and IFN susceptibility of an early SARS-CoV-2 isolate (NL-02-2020) and the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron VOCs in Calu-3 cells, iPSC-derived alveolar type-II cells (iAT2) and air–liquid interface (ALI) cultures of primary human airway epithelial cells. Our data show that Alpha, Beta, and Gamma replicated to similar levels as NL-02-2020. In comparison, Delta consistently yielded higher viral RNA levels, whereas Omicron was attenuated. All viruses were inhibited by type-I, -II, and -III IFNs, albeit to varying extend. Overall, Alpha was slightly less sensitive to IFNs than NL-02-2020, whereas Beta, Gamma, and Delta remained fully sensitive. Strikingly, Omicron BA.1 was least restricted by exogenous IFNs in all cell models. Our results suggest that enhanced innate immune evasion rather than higher replication capacity contributed to the effective spread of Omicron BA.1. Life Science Alliance LLC 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10053418/ /pubmed/36977594 http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202201745 Text en © 2023 Nchioua et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Nchioua, Rayhane Schundner, Annika Klute, Susanne Koepke, Lennart Hirschenberger, Maximilian Noettger, Sabrina Fois, Giorgio Zech, Fabian Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Braubach, Peter Blum, Helmut Stenger, Steffen Kmiec, Dorota Frick, Manfred Kirchhoff, Frank Sparrer, Konstantin MJ Reduced replication but increased interferon resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 |
title | Reduced replication but increased interferon resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 |
title_full | Reduced replication but increased interferon resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 |
title_fullStr | Reduced replication but increased interferon resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 |
title_full_unstemmed | Reduced replication but increased interferon resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 |
title_short | Reduced replication but increased interferon resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 |
title_sort | reduced replication but increased interferon resistance of sars-cov-2 omicron ba.1 |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10053418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977594 http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202201745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nchiouarayhane reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT schundnerannika reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT klutesusanne reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT koepkelennart reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT hirschenbergermaximilian reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT noettgersabrina reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT foisgiorgio reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT zechfabian reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT grafalexander reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT krebsstefan reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT braubachpeter reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT blumhelmut reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT stengersteffen reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT kmiecdorota reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT frickmanfred reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT kirchhofffrank reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 AT sparrerkonstantinmj reducedreplicationbutincreasedinterferonresistanceofsarscov2omicronba1 |