Cargando…
Post‐transcriptional polyadenylation site cleavage maintains 3′‐end processing upon DNA damage
The recognition of polyadenylation signals (PAS) in eukaryotic pre‐mRNAs is usually coupled to transcription termination, occurring while pre‐mRNA is chromatin‐bound. However, for some pre‐mRNAs, this 3′‐end processing occurs post‐transcriptionally, i.e., through a co‐transcriptional cleavage (CoTC)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762421 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022112358 |
_version_ | 1785018651988983808 |
---|---|
author | Sfaxi, Rym Biswas, Biswendu Boldina, Galina Cadix, Mandy Servant, Nicolas Chen, Huimin Larson, Daniel R Dutertre, Martin Robert, Caroline Vagner, Stéphan |
author_facet | Sfaxi, Rym Biswas, Biswendu Boldina, Galina Cadix, Mandy Servant, Nicolas Chen, Huimin Larson, Daniel R Dutertre, Martin Robert, Caroline Vagner, Stéphan |
author_sort | Sfaxi, Rym |
collection | PubMed |
description | The recognition of polyadenylation signals (PAS) in eukaryotic pre‐mRNAs is usually coupled to transcription termination, occurring while pre‐mRNA is chromatin‐bound. However, for some pre‐mRNAs, this 3′‐end processing occurs post‐transcriptionally, i.e., through a co‐transcriptional cleavage (CoTC) event downstream of the PAS, leading to chromatin release and subsequent PAS cleavage in the nucleoplasm. While DNA‐damaging agents trigger the shutdown of co‐transcriptional chromatin‐associated 3′‐end processing, specific compensatory mechanisms exist to ensure efficient 3′‐end processing for certain pre‐mRNAs, including those that encode proteins involved in the DNA damage response, such as the tumor suppressor p53. We show that cleavage at the p53 polyadenylation site occurs in part post‐transcriptionally following a co‐transcriptional cleavage event. Cells with an engineered deletion of the p53 CoTC site exhibit impaired p53 3′‐end processing, decreased mRNA and protein levels of p53 and its transcriptional target p21, and altered cell cycle progression upon UV‐induced DNA damage. Using a transcriptome‐wide analysis of PAS cleavage, we identify additional pre‐mRNAs whose PAS cleavage is maintained in response to UV irradiation and occurring post‐transcriptionally. These findings indicate that CoTC‐type cleavage of pre‐mRNAs, followed by PAS cleavage in the nucleoplasm, allows certain pre‐mRNAs to escape 3′‐end processing inhibition in response to UV‐induced DNA damage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10068322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100683222023-04-04 Post‐transcriptional polyadenylation site cleavage maintains 3′‐end processing upon DNA damage Sfaxi, Rym Biswas, Biswendu Boldina, Galina Cadix, Mandy Servant, Nicolas Chen, Huimin Larson, Daniel R Dutertre, Martin Robert, Caroline Vagner, Stéphan EMBO J Articles The recognition of polyadenylation signals (PAS) in eukaryotic pre‐mRNAs is usually coupled to transcription termination, occurring while pre‐mRNA is chromatin‐bound. However, for some pre‐mRNAs, this 3′‐end processing occurs post‐transcriptionally, i.e., through a co‐transcriptional cleavage (CoTC) event downstream of the PAS, leading to chromatin release and subsequent PAS cleavage in the nucleoplasm. While DNA‐damaging agents trigger the shutdown of co‐transcriptional chromatin‐associated 3′‐end processing, specific compensatory mechanisms exist to ensure efficient 3′‐end processing for certain pre‐mRNAs, including those that encode proteins involved in the DNA damage response, such as the tumor suppressor p53. We show that cleavage at the p53 polyadenylation site occurs in part post‐transcriptionally following a co‐transcriptional cleavage event. Cells with an engineered deletion of the p53 CoTC site exhibit impaired p53 3′‐end processing, decreased mRNA and protein levels of p53 and its transcriptional target p21, and altered cell cycle progression upon UV‐induced DNA damage. Using a transcriptome‐wide analysis of PAS cleavage, we identify additional pre‐mRNAs whose PAS cleavage is maintained in response to UV irradiation and occurring post‐transcriptionally. These findings indicate that CoTC‐type cleavage of pre‐mRNAs, followed by PAS cleavage in the nucleoplasm, allows certain pre‐mRNAs to escape 3′‐end processing inhibition in response to UV‐induced DNA damage. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10068322/ /pubmed/36762421 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022112358 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Sfaxi, Rym Biswas, Biswendu Boldina, Galina Cadix, Mandy Servant, Nicolas Chen, Huimin Larson, Daniel R Dutertre, Martin Robert, Caroline Vagner, Stéphan Post‐transcriptional polyadenylation site cleavage maintains 3′‐end processing upon DNA damage |
title | Post‐transcriptional polyadenylation site cleavage maintains 3′‐end processing upon DNA damage |
title_full | Post‐transcriptional polyadenylation site cleavage maintains 3′‐end processing upon DNA damage |
title_fullStr | Post‐transcriptional polyadenylation site cleavage maintains 3′‐end processing upon DNA damage |
title_full_unstemmed | Post‐transcriptional polyadenylation site cleavage maintains 3′‐end processing upon DNA damage |
title_short | Post‐transcriptional polyadenylation site cleavage maintains 3′‐end processing upon DNA damage |
title_sort | post‐transcriptional polyadenylation site cleavage maintains 3′‐end processing upon dna damage |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762421 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022112358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sfaxirym posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage AT biswasbiswendu posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage AT boldinagalina posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage AT cadixmandy posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage AT servantnicolas posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage AT chenhuimin posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage AT larsondanielr posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage AT dutertremartin posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage AT robertcaroline posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage AT vagnerstephan posttranscriptionalpolyadenylationsitecleavagemaintains3endprocessingupondnadamage |