Cargando…

Hollow-fibre system model of tuberculosis reproducibility and performance specifications for best practice in drug and combination therapy development

BACKGROUND: The hollow-fibre system model of tuberculosis (HFS-TB) has been endorsed by regulators; however, application of HFS-TB requires a thorough understanding of intra- and inter-team variability, statistical power and quality controls. METHODS: Three teams evaluated regimens matching those in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gumbo, Tawanda, Srivastava, Shashikant, Deshpande, Devyani, Pasipanodya, Jotam G, Berg, Alexander, Romero, Klaus, Hermann, David, Hanna, Debra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36794692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad029
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The hollow-fibre system model of tuberculosis (HFS-TB) has been endorsed by regulators; however, application of HFS-TB requires a thorough understanding of intra- and inter-team variability, statistical power and quality controls. METHODS: Three teams evaluated regimens matching those in the Rapid Evaluation of Moxifloxacin in Tuberculosis (REMoxTB) study, plus two high-dose rifampicin/pyrazinamide/moxifloxacin regimens, administered daily for up to 28 or 56 days against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) under log-phase growth, intracellular growth or semidormant growth under acidic conditions. Target inoculum and pharmacokinetic parameters were pre-specified, and the accuracy and bias at achieving these calculated using percent coefficient of variation (%CV) at each sampling point and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: A total of 10 530 individual drug concentrations, and 1026 individual cfu counts were measured. The accuracy in achieving intended inoculum was >98%, and >88% for pharmacokinetic exposures. The 95% CI for the bias crossed zero in all cases. ANOVA revealed that the team effect accounted for <1% of variation in log(10) cfu/mL at each timepoint. The %CV in kill slopes for each regimen and different Mtb metabolic populations was 5.10% (95% CI: 3.36%–6.85%). All REMoxTB arms exhibited nearly identical kill slopes whereas high dose regimens were 33% faster. Sample size analysis revealed that at least three replicate HFS-TB units are needed to identify >20% difference in slope, with a power of >99%. CONCLUSIONS: HFS-TB is a highly tractable tool for choosing combination regimens with little variability between teams, and between replicates.