Cargando…
Clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review
Some persons who smoke have substituted e-cigarettes for tobacco cigarettes, either completely or partially. What effect does this have on cardiovascular functioning? We conducted a living systematic review on human clinical studies measuring the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-03161-z |
_version_ | 1785021222544736256 |
---|---|
author | La Rosa, Giusy Vernooij, Robin Qureshi, Maria Polosa, Riccardo O’Leary, Renée |
author_facet | La Rosa, Giusy Vernooij, Robin Qureshi, Maria Polosa, Riccardo O’Leary, Renée |
author_sort | La Rosa, Giusy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some persons who smoke have substituted e-cigarettes for tobacco cigarettes, either completely or partially. What effect does this have on cardiovascular functioning? We conducted a living systematic review on human clinical studies measuring the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking. The Scopus, PubMed, and CENTRAL Cochrane Library databases were searched on January 31 and April 29, 2021. Three secondary searches and a grey literature search were conducted. Included study designs were randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental clinical trials, and cohort studies. Risk of bias and study quality were evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal tools and the Oxford Catalogue of Bias. The systematic review covered 25 studies comprising 1810 participants who smoked. Twenty studies were rated at high risk of bias, and five as some concerns. A tabular synthesis by direction of effect was conducted due to heterogeneity in the data. Nearly two-thirds of the test analyses indicated that e-cigarette use had no significance difference compared with tobacco cigarettes on heart rate, blood pressure, and in other cardiovascular tests. In two studies, participants with hypertension experienced a clinically relevant reduction in systolic blood pressure after 1 year of e-cigarette use. E-cigarette substitution incurs no additional cardiovascular risks, and some possible benefits may be obtained, but the evidence is of low to very low certainty. An update search on May 30, 2022 retrieved five studies that did not alter our conclusion. Registration PROSPERO #CRD42021239094. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11739-022-03161-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10081981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100819812023-04-09 Clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review La Rosa, Giusy Vernooij, Robin Qureshi, Maria Polosa, Riccardo O’Leary, Renée Intern Emerg Med Ce-systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Some persons who smoke have substituted e-cigarettes for tobacco cigarettes, either completely or partially. What effect does this have on cardiovascular functioning? We conducted a living systematic review on human clinical studies measuring the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking. The Scopus, PubMed, and CENTRAL Cochrane Library databases were searched on January 31 and April 29, 2021. Three secondary searches and a grey literature search were conducted. Included study designs were randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental clinical trials, and cohort studies. Risk of bias and study quality were evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal tools and the Oxford Catalogue of Bias. The systematic review covered 25 studies comprising 1810 participants who smoked. Twenty studies were rated at high risk of bias, and five as some concerns. A tabular synthesis by direction of effect was conducted due to heterogeneity in the data. Nearly two-thirds of the test analyses indicated that e-cigarette use had no significance difference compared with tobacco cigarettes on heart rate, blood pressure, and in other cardiovascular tests. In two studies, participants with hypertension experienced a clinically relevant reduction in systolic blood pressure after 1 year of e-cigarette use. E-cigarette substitution incurs no additional cardiovascular risks, and some possible benefits may be obtained, but the evidence is of low to very low certainty. An update search on May 30, 2022 retrieved five studies that did not alter our conclusion. Registration PROSPERO #CRD42021239094. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11739-022-03161-z. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10081981/ /pubmed/36609804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-03161-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Ce-systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis La Rosa, Giusy Vernooij, Robin Qureshi, Maria Polosa, Riccardo O’Leary, Renée Clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review |
title | Clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review |
title_full | Clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review |
title_fullStr | Clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review |
title_short | Clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review |
title_sort | clinical testing of the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette substitution for smoking: a living systematic review |
topic | Ce-systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-03161-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larosagiusy clinicaltestingofthecardiovasculareffectsofecigarettesubstitutionforsmokingalivingsystematicreview AT vernooijrobin clinicaltestingofthecardiovasculareffectsofecigarettesubstitutionforsmokingalivingsystematicreview AT qureshimaria clinicaltestingofthecardiovasculareffectsofecigarettesubstitutionforsmokingalivingsystematicreview AT polosariccardo clinicaltestingofthecardiovasculareffectsofecigarettesubstitutionforsmokingalivingsystematicreview AT olearyrenee clinicaltestingofthecardiovasculareffectsofecigarettesubstitutionforsmokingalivingsystematicreview |