Cargando…

Neuroprotection of NAD(+) and NBP against ischemia/reperfusion brain injury is associated with restoration of sirtuin-regulated metabolic homeostasis

Background: Ischemic stroke seriously threatens human health because of high rates of morbidity, mortality and disability. This study compared the effects of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(+)) and butylphthalide (NBP) on in vitro and in vivo ischemic stroke models. Methods: Transient middle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xin-Xin, Mao, Guang-Hui, Li, Qi-Qi, Tang, Jie, Zhang, Hua, Wang, Kang-Lin, Wang, Lei, Ni, Hong, Sheng, Rui, Qin, Zheng-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10086243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056986
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1096533
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Ischemic stroke seriously threatens human health because of high rates of morbidity, mortality and disability. This study compared the effects of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(+)) and butylphthalide (NBP) on in vitro and in vivo ischemic stroke models. Methods: Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion (t-MCAO/R) model was established in mice, and the cultured primary cortical neurons were subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R). Cerebral infarct volume, neurobehavioral indices, antioxidant activity, ATP level and lactic acid content were determined. The neuroprotective effects of NAD(+) or NBP were compared using sirtuin inhibitor niacinamide (NAM). Results: Intraperitoneal injection of NBP within 4 h or intravenous injection of NAD(+) within 1 h after t-MCAO/R significantly reduced the volume of infarcts, cerebral edema, and neurological deficits. Administration of NAD(+) and NBP immediately after t-MCAO/R in mice showed similar neuroprotection against acute and long-term ischemic injury. Both NAD(+) and NBP significantly inhibited the accumulation of MDA and H(2)O(2) and reduced oxidative stress. NAD(+) was superior to NBP in inhibiting lipid oxidation and DNA damage. Furthermore, although both NAD(+) and NBP improved the morphology of mitochondrial damage induced by ischemia/reperfusion, NAD(+) more effectively reversed the decrease of ATP and increase of lactic acid after ischemia/reperfusion compared with NBP. NAD(+) but not NBP treatment significantly upregulated SIRT3 in the brain, but the sirtuin inhibitor NAM could abolish the protective effect of NAD(+) and NBP by inhibiting SIRT1 or SIRT3. Conclusions: These results confirmed the protective effects of NAD(+) and NBP on cerebral ischemic injury. NBP and NAD(+) showed similar antioxidant effects, while NAD(+) had better ability in restoring energy metabolism, possibly through upregulating the activity of SIRT1 and SIRT3. The protection provided by NBP against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion may be achieved through SIRT1.