Cargando…
Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
AIMS: Determining dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity by measuring patient's uracil (U) plasma concentration is mandatory before fluoropyrimidine (FP) administration in France. In this study, we aimed to refine the pre‐analytical recommendations for determining U and dihydrouracil (U...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15536 |
_version_ | 1785023265210630144 |
---|---|
author | Maillard, Maud Launay, Manon Royer, Bernard Guitton, Jérôme Gautier‐Veyret, Elodie Broutin, Sophie Tron, Camille Le Louedec, Félicien Ciccolini, Joseph Richard, Damien Alarcan, Hugo Haufroid, Vincent Tafzi, Naïma Schmitt, Antonin Etienne‐Grimaldi, Marie‐Christine Narjoz, Céline Thomas, Fabienne |
author_facet | Maillard, Maud Launay, Manon Royer, Bernard Guitton, Jérôme Gautier‐Veyret, Elodie Broutin, Sophie Tron, Camille Le Louedec, Félicien Ciccolini, Joseph Richard, Damien Alarcan, Hugo Haufroid, Vincent Tafzi, Naïma Schmitt, Antonin Etienne‐Grimaldi, Marie‐Christine Narjoz, Céline Thomas, Fabienne |
author_sort | Maillard, Maud |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Determining dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity by measuring patient's uracil (U) plasma concentration is mandatory before fluoropyrimidine (FP) administration in France. In this study, we aimed to refine the pre‐analytical recommendations for determining U and dihydrouracil (UH(2)) concentrations, as they are essential in reliable DPD‐deficiency testing. METHODS: U and UH(2) concentrations were collected from 14 hospital laboratories. Stability in whole blood and plasma after centrifugation, the type of anticoagulant and long‐term plasma storage were evaluated. The variation induced by time and temperature was calculated and compared to an acceptability range of ±20%. Inter‐occasion variability (IOV) of U and UH(2) was assessed in 573 patients double sampled for DPD‐deficiency testing. RESULTS: Storage of blood samples before centrifugation at room temperature (RT) should not exceed 1 h, whereas cold (+4°C) storage maintains the stability of uracil after 5 hours. For patients correctly double sampled, IOV of U reached 22.4% for U (SD = 17.9%, range = 0–99%). Notably, 17% of them were assigned with a different phenotype (normal or DPD‐deficient) based on the analysis of their two samples. For those having at least one non‐compliant sample, this percentage increased up to 33.8%. The moment of blood collection did not affect the DPD phenotyping result. CONCLUSION: Caution should be taken when interpreting U concentrations if the time before centrifugation exceeds 1 hour at RT, since it rises significantly afterwards. Not respecting the pre‐analytical conditions for DPD phenotyping increases the risk of DPD status misclassification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10092089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100920892023-04-13 Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency Maillard, Maud Launay, Manon Royer, Bernard Guitton, Jérôme Gautier‐Veyret, Elodie Broutin, Sophie Tron, Camille Le Louedec, Félicien Ciccolini, Joseph Richard, Damien Alarcan, Hugo Haufroid, Vincent Tafzi, Naïma Schmitt, Antonin Etienne‐Grimaldi, Marie‐Christine Narjoz, Céline Thomas, Fabienne Br J Clin Pharmacol Original Articles AIMS: Determining dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity by measuring patient's uracil (U) plasma concentration is mandatory before fluoropyrimidine (FP) administration in France. In this study, we aimed to refine the pre‐analytical recommendations for determining U and dihydrouracil (UH(2)) concentrations, as they are essential in reliable DPD‐deficiency testing. METHODS: U and UH(2) concentrations were collected from 14 hospital laboratories. Stability in whole blood and plasma after centrifugation, the type of anticoagulant and long‐term plasma storage were evaluated. The variation induced by time and temperature was calculated and compared to an acceptability range of ±20%. Inter‐occasion variability (IOV) of U and UH(2) was assessed in 573 patients double sampled for DPD‐deficiency testing. RESULTS: Storage of blood samples before centrifugation at room temperature (RT) should not exceed 1 h, whereas cold (+4°C) storage maintains the stability of uracil after 5 hours. For patients correctly double sampled, IOV of U reached 22.4% for U (SD = 17.9%, range = 0–99%). Notably, 17% of them were assigned with a different phenotype (normal or DPD‐deficient) based on the analysis of their two samples. For those having at least one non‐compliant sample, this percentage increased up to 33.8%. The moment of blood collection did not affect the DPD phenotyping result. CONCLUSION: Caution should be taken when interpreting U concentrations if the time before centrifugation exceeds 1 hour at RT, since it rises significantly afterwards. Not respecting the pre‐analytical conditions for DPD phenotyping increases the risk of DPD status misclassification. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-03 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10092089/ /pubmed/36104927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15536 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Maillard, Maud Launay, Manon Royer, Bernard Guitton, Jérôme Gautier‐Veyret, Elodie Broutin, Sophie Tron, Camille Le Louedec, Félicien Ciccolini, Joseph Richard, Damien Alarcan, Hugo Haufroid, Vincent Tafzi, Naïma Schmitt, Antonin Etienne‐Grimaldi, Marie‐Christine Narjoz, Céline Thomas, Fabienne Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency |
title | Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency |
title_full | Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency |
title_fullStr | Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency |
title_short | Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency |
title_sort | quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maillardmaud quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT launaymanon quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT royerbernard quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT guittonjerome quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT gautierveyretelodie quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT broutinsophie quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT troncamille quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT lelouedecfelicien quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT ciccolinijoseph quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT richarddamien quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT alarcanhugo quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT haufroidvincent quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT tafzinaima quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT schmittantonin quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT etiennegrimaldimariechristine quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT narjozceline quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT thomasfabienne quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency AT quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency |