Cargando…

Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency

AIMS: Determining dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity by measuring patient's uracil (U) plasma concentration is mandatory before fluoropyrimidine (FP) administration in France. In this study, we aimed to refine the pre‐analytical recommendations for determining U and dihydrouracil (U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maillard, Maud, Launay, Manon, Royer, Bernard, Guitton, Jérôme, Gautier‐Veyret, Elodie, Broutin, Sophie, Tron, Camille, Le Louedec, Félicien, Ciccolini, Joseph, Richard, Damien, Alarcan, Hugo, Haufroid, Vincent, Tafzi, Naïma, Schmitt, Antonin, Etienne‐Grimaldi, Marie‐Christine, Narjoz, Céline, Thomas, Fabienne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15536
_version_ 1785023265210630144
author Maillard, Maud
Launay, Manon
Royer, Bernard
Guitton, Jérôme
Gautier‐Veyret, Elodie
Broutin, Sophie
Tron, Camille
Le Louedec, Félicien
Ciccolini, Joseph
Richard, Damien
Alarcan, Hugo
Haufroid, Vincent
Tafzi, Naïma
Schmitt, Antonin
Etienne‐Grimaldi, Marie‐Christine
Narjoz, Céline
Thomas, Fabienne
author_facet Maillard, Maud
Launay, Manon
Royer, Bernard
Guitton, Jérôme
Gautier‐Veyret, Elodie
Broutin, Sophie
Tron, Camille
Le Louedec, Félicien
Ciccolini, Joseph
Richard, Damien
Alarcan, Hugo
Haufroid, Vincent
Tafzi, Naïma
Schmitt, Antonin
Etienne‐Grimaldi, Marie‐Christine
Narjoz, Céline
Thomas, Fabienne
author_sort Maillard, Maud
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Determining dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity by measuring patient's uracil (U) plasma concentration is mandatory before fluoropyrimidine (FP) administration in France. In this study, we aimed to refine the pre‐analytical recommendations for determining U and dihydrouracil (UH(2)) concentrations, as they are essential in reliable DPD‐deficiency testing. METHODS: U and UH(2) concentrations were collected from 14 hospital laboratories. Stability in whole blood and plasma after centrifugation, the type of anticoagulant and long‐term plasma storage were evaluated. The variation induced by time and temperature was calculated and compared to an acceptability range of ±20%. Inter‐occasion variability (IOV) of U and UH(2) was assessed in 573 patients double sampled for DPD‐deficiency testing. RESULTS: Storage of blood samples before centrifugation at room temperature (RT) should not exceed 1 h, whereas cold (+4°C) storage maintains the stability of uracil after 5 hours. For patients correctly double sampled, IOV of U reached 22.4% for U (SD = 17.9%, range = 0–99%). Notably, 17% of them were assigned with a different phenotype (normal or DPD‐deficient) based on the analysis of their two samples. For those having at least one non‐compliant sample, this percentage increased up to 33.8%. The moment of blood collection did not affect the DPD phenotyping result. CONCLUSION: Caution should be taken when interpreting U concentrations if the time before centrifugation exceeds 1 hour at RT, since it rises significantly afterwards. Not respecting the pre‐analytical conditions for DPD phenotyping increases the risk of DPD status misclassification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10092089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100920892023-04-13 Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency Maillard, Maud Launay, Manon Royer, Bernard Guitton, Jérôme Gautier‐Veyret, Elodie Broutin, Sophie Tron, Camille Le Louedec, Félicien Ciccolini, Joseph Richard, Damien Alarcan, Hugo Haufroid, Vincent Tafzi, Naïma Schmitt, Antonin Etienne‐Grimaldi, Marie‐Christine Narjoz, Céline Thomas, Fabienne Br J Clin Pharmacol Original Articles AIMS: Determining dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity by measuring patient's uracil (U) plasma concentration is mandatory before fluoropyrimidine (FP) administration in France. In this study, we aimed to refine the pre‐analytical recommendations for determining U and dihydrouracil (UH(2)) concentrations, as they are essential in reliable DPD‐deficiency testing. METHODS: U and UH(2) concentrations were collected from 14 hospital laboratories. Stability in whole blood and plasma after centrifugation, the type of anticoagulant and long‐term plasma storage were evaluated. The variation induced by time and temperature was calculated and compared to an acceptability range of ±20%. Inter‐occasion variability (IOV) of U and UH(2) was assessed in 573 patients double sampled for DPD‐deficiency testing. RESULTS: Storage of blood samples before centrifugation at room temperature (RT) should not exceed 1 h, whereas cold (+4°C) storage maintains the stability of uracil after 5 hours. For patients correctly double sampled, IOV of U reached 22.4% for U (SD = 17.9%, range = 0–99%). Notably, 17% of them were assigned with a different phenotype (normal or DPD‐deficient) based on the analysis of their two samples. For those having at least one non‐compliant sample, this percentage increased up to 33.8%. The moment of blood collection did not affect the DPD phenotyping result. CONCLUSION: Caution should be taken when interpreting U concentrations if the time before centrifugation exceeds 1 hour at RT, since it rises significantly afterwards. Not respecting the pre‐analytical conditions for DPD phenotyping increases the risk of DPD status misclassification. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-03 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10092089/ /pubmed/36104927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15536 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Maillard, Maud
Launay, Manon
Royer, Bernard
Guitton, Jérôme
Gautier‐Veyret, Elodie
Broutin, Sophie
Tron, Camille
Le Louedec, Félicien
Ciccolini, Joseph
Richard, Damien
Alarcan, Hugo
Haufroid, Vincent
Tafzi, Naïma
Schmitt, Antonin
Etienne‐Grimaldi, Marie‐Christine
Narjoz, Céline
Thomas, Fabienne
Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
title Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
title_full Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
title_fullStr Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
title_short Quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
title_sort quantitative impact of pre‐analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10092089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15536
work_keys_str_mv AT maillardmaud quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT launaymanon quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT royerbernard quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT guittonjerome quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT gautierveyretelodie quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT broutinsophie quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT troncamille quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT lelouedecfelicien quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT ciccolinijoseph quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT richarddamien quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT alarcanhugo quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT haufroidvincent quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT tafzinaima quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT schmittantonin quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT etiennegrimaldimariechristine quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT narjozceline quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT thomasfabienne quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency
AT quantitativeimpactofpreanalyticalprocessonplasmauracilwhentestingfordihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency