Cargando…

Content and process: using continuous quality improvement to teach and evaluate learning outcomes in quality improvement residency education

BACKGROUND: Psychiatry has not prioritised quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) to the same degree as other medical specialties. Professional capacity building in QIPS through the education of residents is essential to improving the quality and safety of mental healthcare delivery. LOCAL PR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burra, Tara, Peck, Jared R, Waddell, Andrea E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36414331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001806
_version_ 1785024766004953088
author Burra, Tara
Peck, Jared R
Waddell, Andrea E
author_facet Burra, Tara
Peck, Jared R
Waddell, Andrea E
author_sort Burra, Tara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psychiatry has not prioritised quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) to the same degree as other medical specialties. Professional capacity building in QIPS through the education of residents is essential to improving the quality and safety of mental healthcare delivery. LOCAL PROBLEM: The University of Toronto postgraduate psychiatry program is the largest psychiatry training program in North America. Training in QIPS was introduced in 2006. In 2019, a curricular review found that few trainees acquired competence in QIPS. METHODS: Curricular change was undertaken using Kern’s Six-Step Approach to curricular design. We used a continuous quality improvement framework to inform the evaluation with data collection using an online educational application. We aimed to improve competence in QIPS as demonstrated by assessment of the quality of individual quality improvement projects (IQIP) on an 11-item rubric. We used a family of quality improvement measures to iteratively improve the curriculum over 3 years. INTERVENTIONS: We restructured the QIPS curriculum into four case-based seminars for third year psychiatry residents. The curriculum included: clear learning objectives, multimodal instructional methods, and an IQIP. RESULTS: The mean score on preintervention project evaluations was 5.3/11 (49% (18)), which increased to 9.2/11 (84% (11.5)) with the revised curriculum (t=8.80, two tail, p<0.001; Cohen’s d(s) 2.63). In the first two cohorts of residents to complete the IQIPs, 67/72 (93%) completed at least one Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, compared with 11/23 (48%) in the 2 years before the new curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure our trainees were attaining the educational goal of competence in QIPS, we introduced a revised QIPS curriculum and embedded an evaluation rooted in improvement science. This study adds to the limited literature which uses continuous quality improvement to enhance QIPS education, which is particularly needed in mental health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100982572023-04-14 Content and process: using continuous quality improvement to teach and evaluate learning outcomes in quality improvement residency education Burra, Tara Peck, Jared R Waddell, Andrea E BMJ Open Qual Quality Education Report BACKGROUND: Psychiatry has not prioritised quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) to the same degree as other medical specialties. Professional capacity building in QIPS through the education of residents is essential to improving the quality and safety of mental healthcare delivery. LOCAL PROBLEM: The University of Toronto postgraduate psychiatry program is the largest psychiatry training program in North America. Training in QIPS was introduced in 2006. In 2019, a curricular review found that few trainees acquired competence in QIPS. METHODS: Curricular change was undertaken using Kern’s Six-Step Approach to curricular design. We used a continuous quality improvement framework to inform the evaluation with data collection using an online educational application. We aimed to improve competence in QIPS as demonstrated by assessment of the quality of individual quality improvement projects (IQIP) on an 11-item rubric. We used a family of quality improvement measures to iteratively improve the curriculum over 3 years. INTERVENTIONS: We restructured the QIPS curriculum into four case-based seminars for third year psychiatry residents. The curriculum included: clear learning objectives, multimodal instructional methods, and an IQIP. RESULTS: The mean score on preintervention project evaluations was 5.3/11 (49% (18)), which increased to 9.2/11 (84% (11.5)) with the revised curriculum (t=8.80, two tail, p<0.001; Cohen’s d(s) 2.63). In the first two cohorts of residents to complete the IQIPs, 67/72 (93%) completed at least one Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, compared with 11/23 (48%) in the 2 years before the new curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure our trainees were attaining the educational goal of competence in QIPS, we introduced a revised QIPS curriculum and embedded an evaluation rooted in improvement science. This study adds to the limited literature which uses continuous quality improvement to enhance QIPS education, which is particularly needed in mental health. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10098257/ /pubmed/36414331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001806 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Quality Education Report
Burra, Tara
Peck, Jared R
Waddell, Andrea E
Content and process: using continuous quality improvement to teach and evaluate learning outcomes in quality improvement residency education
title Content and process: using continuous quality improvement to teach and evaluate learning outcomes in quality improvement residency education
title_full Content and process: using continuous quality improvement to teach and evaluate learning outcomes in quality improvement residency education
title_fullStr Content and process: using continuous quality improvement to teach and evaluate learning outcomes in quality improvement residency education
title_full_unstemmed Content and process: using continuous quality improvement to teach and evaluate learning outcomes in quality improvement residency education
title_short Content and process: using continuous quality improvement to teach and evaluate learning outcomes in quality improvement residency education
title_sort content and process: using continuous quality improvement to teach and evaluate learning outcomes in quality improvement residency education
topic Quality Education Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36414331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001806
work_keys_str_mv AT burratara contentandprocessusingcontinuousqualityimprovementtoteachandevaluatelearningoutcomesinqualityimprovementresidencyeducation
AT peckjaredr contentandprocessusingcontinuousqualityimprovementtoteachandevaluatelearningoutcomesinqualityimprovementresidencyeducation
AT waddellandreae contentandprocessusingcontinuousqualityimprovementtoteachandevaluatelearningoutcomesinqualityimprovementresidencyeducation