Cargando…

Biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy

OBJECTIVES: Technical limitations of ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy has been considered responsible for substantial upgrading rate in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the impact of tumor specific factors for upgrading remain uninvestigated. METHODS: Patients who underwent URS biopsy wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katayama, Satoshi, Pradere, Benjamin, Grossman, Nico C., Potretzke, Aaron M., Boorjian, Stephen A., Ghoreifi, Alireza, Daneshmand, Sia, Djaladat, Hooman, Sfakianos, John P., Mari, Andrea, Khene, Zine‐Eddine, D'Andrea, David, Hayakawa, Nozomi, Breda, Alberto, Fontana, Matteo, Fujita, Kazutoshi, Antonelli, Alessandro, van Doeveren, Thomas, Steinbach, Christina, Mori, Keiichiro, Laukhtina, Ekaterina, Rouprêt, Morgan, Margulis, Vitaly, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Araki, Motoo, Compérat, Eva, Nasu, Yasutomo, Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36349904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.15061
_version_ 1785024916060372992
author Katayama, Satoshi
Pradere, Benjamin
Grossman, Nico C.
Potretzke, Aaron M.
Boorjian, Stephen A.
Ghoreifi, Alireza
Daneshmand, Sia
Djaladat, Hooman
Sfakianos, John P.
Mari, Andrea
Khene, Zine‐Eddine
D'Andrea, David
Hayakawa, Nozomi
Breda, Alberto
Fontana, Matteo
Fujita, Kazutoshi
Antonelli, Alessandro
van Doeveren, Thomas
Steinbach, Christina
Mori, Keiichiro
Laukhtina, Ekaterina
Rouprêt, Morgan
Margulis, Vitaly
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Araki, Motoo
Compérat, Eva
Nasu, Yasutomo
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
author_facet Katayama, Satoshi
Pradere, Benjamin
Grossman, Nico C.
Potretzke, Aaron M.
Boorjian, Stephen A.
Ghoreifi, Alireza
Daneshmand, Sia
Djaladat, Hooman
Sfakianos, John P.
Mari, Andrea
Khene, Zine‐Eddine
D'Andrea, David
Hayakawa, Nozomi
Breda, Alberto
Fontana, Matteo
Fujita, Kazutoshi
Antonelli, Alessandro
van Doeveren, Thomas
Steinbach, Christina
Mori, Keiichiro
Laukhtina, Ekaterina
Rouprêt, Morgan
Margulis, Vitaly
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Araki, Motoo
Compérat, Eva
Nasu, Yasutomo
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
author_sort Katayama, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Technical limitations of ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy has been considered responsible for substantial upgrading rate in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the impact of tumor specific factors for upgrading remain uninvestigated. METHODS: Patients who underwent URS biopsy were included between 2005 and 2020 at 13 institutions. We assessed the prognostic impact of upgrading (low‐grade on URS biopsy) versus same grade (high‐grade on URS biopsy) for high‐grade UTUC tumors on radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) specimens. RESULTS: This study included 371 patients, of whom 112 (30%) and 259 (70%) were biopsy‐based low‐ and high‐grade tumors, respectively. Median follow‐up was 27.3 months. Patients with high‐grade biopsy were more likely to harbor unfavorable pathologic features, such as lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (LNs; p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses adjusting for the established risk factors, high‐grade biopsy was significantly associated with worse overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–2.75; p = 0.018), cancer‐specific (HR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.07–3.52; p = 0.03), and recurrence‐free survival (HR 1.80; 95% CI, 1.13–2.87; p = 0.013). In subgroup analyses of patients with pT2‐T4 and/or positive LN, its significant association retained. Furthermore, high‐grade biopsy in clinically non‐muscle invasive disease significantly predicted upstaging to final pathologically advanced disease (≥pT2) compared to low‐grade biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: High tumor grade on URS biopsy is associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive UTUC tumors. URS low‐grade UTUC that becomes upgraded to high‐grade might carry a better prognosis than high‐grade UTUC on URS. Tumor specific factors are likely to be responsible for upgrading to high‐grade on RNU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100988612023-04-14 Biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy Katayama, Satoshi Pradere, Benjamin Grossman, Nico C. Potretzke, Aaron M. Boorjian, Stephen A. Ghoreifi, Alireza Daneshmand, Sia Djaladat, Hooman Sfakianos, John P. Mari, Andrea Khene, Zine‐Eddine D'Andrea, David Hayakawa, Nozomi Breda, Alberto Fontana, Matteo Fujita, Kazutoshi Antonelli, Alessandro van Doeveren, Thomas Steinbach, Christina Mori, Keiichiro Laukhtina, Ekaterina Rouprêt, Morgan Margulis, Vitaly Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Araki, Motoo Compérat, Eva Nasu, Yasutomo Shariat, Shahrokh F. Int J Urol Original Articles: Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVES: Technical limitations of ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy has been considered responsible for substantial upgrading rate in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the impact of tumor specific factors for upgrading remain uninvestigated. METHODS: Patients who underwent URS biopsy were included between 2005 and 2020 at 13 institutions. We assessed the prognostic impact of upgrading (low‐grade on URS biopsy) versus same grade (high‐grade on URS biopsy) for high‐grade UTUC tumors on radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) specimens. RESULTS: This study included 371 patients, of whom 112 (30%) and 259 (70%) were biopsy‐based low‐ and high‐grade tumors, respectively. Median follow‐up was 27.3 months. Patients with high‐grade biopsy were more likely to harbor unfavorable pathologic features, such as lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (LNs; p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses adjusting for the established risk factors, high‐grade biopsy was significantly associated with worse overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–2.75; p = 0.018), cancer‐specific (HR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.07–3.52; p = 0.03), and recurrence‐free survival (HR 1.80; 95% CI, 1.13–2.87; p = 0.013). In subgroup analyses of patients with pT2‐T4 and/or positive LN, its significant association retained. Furthermore, high‐grade biopsy in clinically non‐muscle invasive disease significantly predicted upstaging to final pathologically advanced disease (≥pT2) compared to low‐grade biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: High tumor grade on URS biopsy is associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive UTUC tumors. URS low‐grade UTUC that becomes upgraded to high‐grade might carry a better prognosis than high‐grade UTUC on URS. Tumor specific factors are likely to be responsible for upgrading to high‐grade on RNU. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-09 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10098861/ /pubmed/36349904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.15061 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Urological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles: Clinical Investigation
Katayama, Satoshi
Pradere, Benjamin
Grossman, Nico C.
Potretzke, Aaron M.
Boorjian, Stephen A.
Ghoreifi, Alireza
Daneshmand, Sia
Djaladat, Hooman
Sfakianos, John P.
Mari, Andrea
Khene, Zine‐Eddine
D'Andrea, David
Hayakawa, Nozomi
Breda, Alberto
Fontana, Matteo
Fujita, Kazutoshi
Antonelli, Alessandro
van Doeveren, Thomas
Steinbach, Christina
Mori, Keiichiro
Laukhtina, Ekaterina
Rouprêt, Morgan
Margulis, Vitaly
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Araki, Motoo
Compérat, Eva
Nasu, Yasutomo
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy
title Biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy
title_full Biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy
title_fullStr Biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy
title_short Biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy
title_sort biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy
topic Original Articles: Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36349904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.15061
work_keys_str_mv AT katayamasatoshi biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT praderebenjamin biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT grossmannicoc biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT potretzkeaaronm biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT boorjianstephena biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT ghoreifialireza biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT daneshmandsia biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT djaladathooman biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT sfakianosjohnp biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT mariandrea biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT khenezineeddine biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT dandreadavid biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT hayakawanozomi biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT bredaalberto biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT fontanamatteo biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT fujitakazutoshi biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT antonellialessandro biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT vandoeverenthomas biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT steinbachchristina biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT morikeiichiro biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT laukhtinaekaterina biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT roupretmorgan biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT margulisvitaly biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT karakiewiczpierrei biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT arakimotoo biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT comperateva biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT nasuyasutomo biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy
AT shariatshahrokhf biologicalandprognosticimplicationsofbiopsyupgradingforhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaatnephroureterectomy