Cargando…

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Emotional Intelligence Test (EMI‐T) for social care and healthcare student selection

AIM: To develop an emotional intelligence (EI) test and evaluate its psychometrics for social and healthcare student selection. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional methodological design. METHODS: The test was developed based on a systematic review and focus group interviews. Content validity was evaluated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pienimaa, Anne, Talman, Kirsi, Vierula, Jonna, Laakkonen, Eero, Haavisto, Elina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36575904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15557
_version_ 1785026572599689216
author Pienimaa, Anne
Talman, Kirsi
Vierula, Jonna
Laakkonen, Eero
Haavisto, Elina
author_facet Pienimaa, Anne
Talman, Kirsi
Vierula, Jonna
Laakkonen, Eero
Haavisto, Elina
author_sort Pienimaa, Anne
collection PubMed
description AIM: To develop an emotional intelligence (EI) test and evaluate its psychometrics for social and healthcare student selection. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional methodological design. METHODS: The test was developed based on a systematic review and focus group interviews. Content validity was evaluated with expert panels, and preliminary psychometrics with two pilot studies. Descriptive statistics, correlations and item response theory were used. DATA SOURCES: Search was conducted in six databases 2018. Focus group interviews were conducted with educators and professionals in 2019. Expert panels with doctoral students, researchers and educators were conducted in 2020. Pilot tests with students were conducted 2020–2021. The developed test was administered to 4808 applicants 2021. RESULTS: The test included four subscales. Correlations support the test's theoretical structure. The items were mainly easy. CONCLUSION: The test assesses EI objectively and comprehensively. The item‐level distractor analysis can be used for further test development. IMPACTS: Social care and healthcare students engage in clinical practice early in their studies, and these environments can be emotionally challenging. Assessing EI in student selection with adequate test can help the institutions of higher education to select the students with required abilities to succeed in the studies. The assessment of EI during student selection also provides information higher education institutions could use to develop and provide support interventions. The results may also encourage practice placements to include EI elements as learning objective. The results of this study and especially the use of IRT and detailed distractor analysis to evaluate the psychometric properties of EMI‐T can benefit researchers and educators that develop or evaluate objective assessment tools with multiple choice questions. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Emotional intelligence is important for students to enable professional interaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10107289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101072892023-04-18 Development and psychometric evaluation of the Emotional Intelligence Test (EMI‐T) for social care and healthcare student selection Pienimaa, Anne Talman, Kirsi Vierula, Jonna Laakkonen, Eero Haavisto, Elina J Adv Nurs Research Papers AIM: To develop an emotional intelligence (EI) test and evaluate its psychometrics for social and healthcare student selection. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional methodological design. METHODS: The test was developed based on a systematic review and focus group interviews. Content validity was evaluated with expert panels, and preliminary psychometrics with two pilot studies. Descriptive statistics, correlations and item response theory were used. DATA SOURCES: Search was conducted in six databases 2018. Focus group interviews were conducted with educators and professionals in 2019. Expert panels with doctoral students, researchers and educators were conducted in 2020. Pilot tests with students were conducted 2020–2021. The developed test was administered to 4808 applicants 2021. RESULTS: The test included four subscales. Correlations support the test's theoretical structure. The items were mainly easy. CONCLUSION: The test assesses EI objectively and comprehensively. The item‐level distractor analysis can be used for further test development. IMPACTS: Social care and healthcare students engage in clinical practice early in their studies, and these environments can be emotionally challenging. Assessing EI in student selection with adequate test can help the institutions of higher education to select the students with required abilities to succeed in the studies. The assessment of EI during student selection also provides information higher education institutions could use to develop and provide support interventions. The results may also encourage practice placements to include EI elements as learning objective. The results of this study and especially the use of IRT and detailed distractor analysis to evaluate the psychometric properties of EMI‐T can benefit researchers and educators that develop or evaluate objective assessment tools with multiple choice questions. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Emotional intelligence is important for students to enable professional interaction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-27 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10107289/ /pubmed/36575904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15557 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Pienimaa, Anne
Talman, Kirsi
Vierula, Jonna
Laakkonen, Eero
Haavisto, Elina
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Emotional Intelligence Test (EMI‐T) for social care and healthcare student selection
title Development and psychometric evaluation of the Emotional Intelligence Test (EMI‐T) for social care and healthcare student selection
title_full Development and psychometric evaluation of the Emotional Intelligence Test (EMI‐T) for social care and healthcare student selection
title_fullStr Development and psychometric evaluation of the Emotional Intelligence Test (EMI‐T) for social care and healthcare student selection
title_full_unstemmed Development and psychometric evaluation of the Emotional Intelligence Test (EMI‐T) for social care and healthcare student selection
title_short Development and psychometric evaluation of the Emotional Intelligence Test (EMI‐T) for social care and healthcare student selection
title_sort development and psychometric evaluation of the emotional intelligence test (emi‐t) for social care and healthcare student selection
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36575904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15557
work_keys_str_mv AT pienimaaanne developmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheemotionalintelligencetestemitforsocialcareandhealthcarestudentselection
AT talmankirsi developmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheemotionalintelligencetestemitforsocialcareandhealthcarestudentselection
AT vierulajonna developmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheemotionalintelligencetestemitforsocialcareandhealthcarestudentselection
AT laakkoneneero developmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheemotionalintelligencetestemitforsocialcareandhealthcarestudentselection
AT haavistoelina developmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheemotionalintelligencetestemitforsocialcareandhealthcarestudentselection