Cargando…
Chromatin accessibility differences between alpha, beta, and delta cells identifies common and cell type-specific enhancers
BACKGROUND: High throughput sequencing has enabled the interrogation of the transcriptomic landscape of glucagon-secreting alpha cells, insulin-secreting beta cells, and somatostatin-secreting delta cells. These approaches have furthered our understanding of expression patterns that define healthy o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37069576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09293-6 |
_version_ | 1785026867510640640 |
---|---|
author | Mawla, Alex M. van der Meulen, Talitha Huising, Mark O. |
author_facet | Mawla, Alex M. van der Meulen, Talitha Huising, Mark O. |
author_sort | Mawla, Alex M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High throughput sequencing has enabled the interrogation of the transcriptomic landscape of glucagon-secreting alpha cells, insulin-secreting beta cells, and somatostatin-secreting delta cells. These approaches have furthered our understanding of expression patterns that define healthy or diseased islet cell types and helped explicate some of the intricacies between major islet cell crosstalk and glucose regulation. All three endocrine cell types derive from a common pancreatic progenitor, yet alpha and beta cells have partially opposing functions, and delta cells modulate and control insulin and glucagon release. While gene expression signatures that define and maintain cellular identity have been widely explored, the underlying epigenetic components are incompletely characterized and understood. However, chromatin accessibility and remodeling is a dynamic attribute that plays a critical role to determine and maintain cellular identity. RESULTS: Here, we compare and contrast the chromatin landscape between mouse alpha, beta, and delta cells using ATAC-Seq to evaluate the significant differences in chromatin accessibility. The similarities and differences in chromatin accessibility between these related islet endocrine cells help define their fate in support of their distinct functional roles. We identify patterns that suggest that both alpha and delta cells are poised, but repressed, from becoming beta-like. We also identify patterns in differentially enriched chromatin that have transcription factor motifs preferentially associated with different regions of the genome. Finally, we not only confirm and visualize previously discovered common endocrine- and cell specific- enhancer regions across differentially enriched chromatin, but identify novel regions as well. We compiled our chromatin accessibility data in a freely accessible database of common endocrine- and cell specific-enhancer regions that can be navigated with minimal bioinformatics expertise. CONCLUSIONS: Both alpha and delta cells appear poised, but repressed, from becoming beta cells in murine pancreatic islets. These data broadly support earlier findings on the plasticity in identity of non-beta cells under certain circumstances. Furthermore, differential chromatin accessibility shows preferentially enriched distal-intergenic regions in beta cells, when compared to either alpha or delta cells. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09293-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10108528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101085282023-04-18 Chromatin accessibility differences between alpha, beta, and delta cells identifies common and cell type-specific enhancers Mawla, Alex M. van der Meulen, Talitha Huising, Mark O. BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: High throughput sequencing has enabled the interrogation of the transcriptomic landscape of glucagon-secreting alpha cells, insulin-secreting beta cells, and somatostatin-secreting delta cells. These approaches have furthered our understanding of expression patterns that define healthy or diseased islet cell types and helped explicate some of the intricacies between major islet cell crosstalk and glucose regulation. All three endocrine cell types derive from a common pancreatic progenitor, yet alpha and beta cells have partially opposing functions, and delta cells modulate and control insulin and glucagon release. While gene expression signatures that define and maintain cellular identity have been widely explored, the underlying epigenetic components are incompletely characterized and understood. However, chromatin accessibility and remodeling is a dynamic attribute that plays a critical role to determine and maintain cellular identity. RESULTS: Here, we compare and contrast the chromatin landscape between mouse alpha, beta, and delta cells using ATAC-Seq to evaluate the significant differences in chromatin accessibility. The similarities and differences in chromatin accessibility between these related islet endocrine cells help define their fate in support of their distinct functional roles. We identify patterns that suggest that both alpha and delta cells are poised, but repressed, from becoming beta-like. We also identify patterns in differentially enriched chromatin that have transcription factor motifs preferentially associated with different regions of the genome. Finally, we not only confirm and visualize previously discovered common endocrine- and cell specific- enhancer regions across differentially enriched chromatin, but identify novel regions as well. We compiled our chromatin accessibility data in a freely accessible database of common endocrine- and cell specific-enhancer regions that can be navigated with minimal bioinformatics expertise. CONCLUSIONS: Both alpha and delta cells appear poised, but repressed, from becoming beta cells in murine pancreatic islets. These data broadly support earlier findings on the plasticity in identity of non-beta cells under certain circumstances. Furthermore, differential chromatin accessibility shows preferentially enriched distal-intergenic regions in beta cells, when compared to either alpha or delta cells. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-023-09293-6. BioMed Central 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10108528/ /pubmed/37069576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09293-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mawla, Alex M. van der Meulen, Talitha Huising, Mark O. Chromatin accessibility differences between alpha, beta, and delta cells identifies common and cell type-specific enhancers |
title | Chromatin accessibility differences between alpha, beta, and delta cells identifies common and cell type-specific enhancers |
title_full | Chromatin accessibility differences between alpha, beta, and delta cells identifies common and cell type-specific enhancers |
title_fullStr | Chromatin accessibility differences between alpha, beta, and delta cells identifies common and cell type-specific enhancers |
title_full_unstemmed | Chromatin accessibility differences between alpha, beta, and delta cells identifies common and cell type-specific enhancers |
title_short | Chromatin accessibility differences between alpha, beta, and delta cells identifies common and cell type-specific enhancers |
title_sort | chromatin accessibility differences between alpha, beta, and delta cells identifies common and cell type-specific enhancers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37069576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09293-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mawlaalexm chromatinaccessibilitydifferencesbetweenalphabetaanddeltacellsidentifiescommonandcelltypespecificenhancers AT vandermeulentalitha chromatinaccessibilitydifferencesbetweenalphabetaanddeltacellsidentifiescommonandcelltypespecificenhancers AT huisingmarko chromatinaccessibilitydifferencesbetweenalphabetaanddeltacellsidentifiescommonandcelltypespecificenhancers |