Cargando…

Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: High consumption of red and processed meat increases the risk of several chronic diseases. Many people, especially in high-income countries, eat more meat than recommended by nutritional and health agencies. Meat production also has negative impacts on the environment and contributes t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moosburger, Ramona, Wagner, Julia, Heldt, Katharina, Richter, Almut, Manz, Kristin, Mensink, Gert B M, Loss, Julika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071122
_version_ 1785029810061312000
author Moosburger, Ramona
Wagner, Julia
Heldt, Katharina
Richter, Almut
Manz, Kristin
Mensink, Gert B M
Loss, Julika
author_facet Moosburger, Ramona
Wagner, Julia
Heldt, Katharina
Richter, Almut
Manz, Kristin
Mensink, Gert B M
Loss, Julika
author_sort Moosburger, Ramona
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: High consumption of red and processed meat increases the risk of several chronic diseases. Many people, especially in high-income countries, eat more meat than recommended by nutritional and health agencies. Meat production also has negative impacts on the environment and contributes to climate change. Therefore, climate protection, besides health or animal welfare, could motivate individuals to eat less meat. Willingness to reduce meat consumption and motives to do so are not yet fully understood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extended guidelines, a scoping review of peer-reviewed original studies will be conducted to address three questions: What is the evidence regarding (1) the willingness of individuals to reduce meat consumption to mitigate climate change, (2) the awareness of individuals about the link between their meat consumption and the potential to mitigate climate change and (3) individuals having reduced meat consumption for the reason of climate protection? We will search the databases Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Greenfile (via Ebsco) and PsynDex/CurrentContent/Agris (via Livivo) using a systematic search string. Studies from 2015 onwards, published in English, German, Danish or Dutch, will be included. We will include observational studies, qualitative studies, intervention studies (if they include surveys) and reviews. Data will be summarised in a narrative synthesis, comprising methods, population characteristics, meat type under study, indicators measured and limitations. Key findings will be grouped according to the research questions. This scoping review will help clarify the role of climate protection in individual reduction of meat consumption and identify research gaps in this field. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. Findings of this scoping review will be presented at scientific conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWB85.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10124295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101242952023-04-25 Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review Moosburger, Ramona Wagner, Julia Heldt, Katharina Richter, Almut Manz, Kristin Mensink, Gert B M Loss, Julika BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: High consumption of red and processed meat increases the risk of several chronic diseases. Many people, especially in high-income countries, eat more meat than recommended by nutritional and health agencies. Meat production also has negative impacts on the environment and contributes to climate change. Therefore, climate protection, besides health or animal welfare, could motivate individuals to eat less meat. Willingness to reduce meat consumption and motives to do so are not yet fully understood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extended guidelines, a scoping review of peer-reviewed original studies will be conducted to address three questions: What is the evidence regarding (1) the willingness of individuals to reduce meat consumption to mitigate climate change, (2) the awareness of individuals about the link between their meat consumption and the potential to mitigate climate change and (3) individuals having reduced meat consumption for the reason of climate protection? We will search the databases Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Greenfile (via Ebsco) and PsynDex/CurrentContent/Agris (via Livivo) using a systematic search string. Studies from 2015 onwards, published in English, German, Danish or Dutch, will be included. We will include observational studies, qualitative studies, intervention studies (if they include surveys) and reviews. Data will be summarised in a narrative synthesis, comprising methods, population characteristics, meat type under study, indicators measured and limitations. Key findings will be grouped according to the research questions. This scoping review will help clarify the role of climate protection in individual reduction of meat consumption and identify research gaps in this field. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. Findings of this scoping review will be presented at scientific conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWB85. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10124295/ /pubmed/37072363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071122 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Moosburger, Ramona
Wagner, Julia
Heldt, Katharina
Richter, Almut
Manz, Kristin
Mensink, Gert B M
Loss, Julika
Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review
title Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review
title_full Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review
title_short Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review
title_sort perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071122
work_keys_str_mv AT moosburgerramona perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview
AT wagnerjulia perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview
AT heldtkatharina perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview
AT richteralmut perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview
AT manzkristin perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview
AT mensinkgertbm perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview
AT lossjulika perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview