Cargando…
Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review
INTRODUCTION: High consumption of red and processed meat increases the risk of several chronic diseases. Many people, especially in high-income countries, eat more meat than recommended by nutritional and health agencies. Meat production also has negative impacts on the environment and contributes t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071122 |
_version_ | 1785029810061312000 |
---|---|
author | Moosburger, Ramona Wagner, Julia Heldt, Katharina Richter, Almut Manz, Kristin Mensink, Gert B M Loss, Julika |
author_facet | Moosburger, Ramona Wagner, Julia Heldt, Katharina Richter, Almut Manz, Kristin Mensink, Gert B M Loss, Julika |
author_sort | Moosburger, Ramona |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: High consumption of red and processed meat increases the risk of several chronic diseases. Many people, especially in high-income countries, eat more meat than recommended by nutritional and health agencies. Meat production also has negative impacts on the environment and contributes to climate change. Therefore, climate protection, besides health or animal welfare, could motivate individuals to eat less meat. Willingness to reduce meat consumption and motives to do so are not yet fully understood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extended guidelines, a scoping review of peer-reviewed original studies will be conducted to address three questions: What is the evidence regarding (1) the willingness of individuals to reduce meat consumption to mitigate climate change, (2) the awareness of individuals about the link between their meat consumption and the potential to mitigate climate change and (3) individuals having reduced meat consumption for the reason of climate protection? We will search the databases Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Greenfile (via Ebsco) and PsynDex/CurrentContent/Agris (via Livivo) using a systematic search string. Studies from 2015 onwards, published in English, German, Danish or Dutch, will be included. We will include observational studies, qualitative studies, intervention studies (if they include surveys) and reviews. Data will be summarised in a narrative synthesis, comprising methods, population characteristics, meat type under study, indicators measured and limitations. Key findings will be grouped according to the research questions. This scoping review will help clarify the role of climate protection in individual reduction of meat consumption and identify research gaps in this field. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. Findings of this scoping review will be presented at scientific conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWB85. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10124295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101242952023-04-25 Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review Moosburger, Ramona Wagner, Julia Heldt, Katharina Richter, Almut Manz, Kristin Mensink, Gert B M Loss, Julika BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: High consumption of red and processed meat increases the risk of several chronic diseases. Many people, especially in high-income countries, eat more meat than recommended by nutritional and health agencies. Meat production also has negative impacts on the environment and contributes to climate change. Therefore, climate protection, besides health or animal welfare, could motivate individuals to eat less meat. Willingness to reduce meat consumption and motives to do so are not yet fully understood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extended guidelines, a scoping review of peer-reviewed original studies will be conducted to address three questions: What is the evidence regarding (1) the willingness of individuals to reduce meat consumption to mitigate climate change, (2) the awareness of individuals about the link between their meat consumption and the potential to mitigate climate change and (3) individuals having reduced meat consumption for the reason of climate protection? We will search the databases Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Greenfile (via Ebsco) and PsynDex/CurrentContent/Agris (via Livivo) using a systematic search string. Studies from 2015 onwards, published in English, German, Danish or Dutch, will be included. We will include observational studies, qualitative studies, intervention studies (if they include surveys) and reviews. Data will be summarised in a narrative synthesis, comprising methods, population characteristics, meat type under study, indicators measured and limitations. Key findings will be grouped according to the research questions. This scoping review will help clarify the role of climate protection in individual reduction of meat consumption and identify research gaps in this field. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. Findings of this scoping review will be presented at scientific conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWB85. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10124295/ /pubmed/37072363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071122 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Public Health Moosburger, Ramona Wagner, Julia Heldt, Katharina Richter, Almut Manz, Kristin Mensink, Gert B M Loss, Julika Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review |
title | Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review |
title_full | Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review |
title_short | Perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review |
title_sort | perspectives of individuals on reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change: protocol for a scoping review |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moosburgerramona perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview AT wagnerjulia perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview AT heldtkatharina perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview AT richteralmut perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview AT manzkristin perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview AT mensinkgertbm perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview AT lossjulika perspectivesofindividualsonreducingmeatconsumptiontomitigateclimatechangeprotocolforascopingreview |