Cargando…
Knowledge Attainment and Engagement Among Medical Students: A Comparison of Three Forms of Online Learning
OBJECTIVE: This study compared knowledge attainment and student enjoyment and engagement between clinical case vignette, patient-testimony videos and mixed reality (MR) teaching via the Microsoft HoloLens 2, all delivered remotely to third year medical students. The feasibility of conducting MR teac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101695 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S391816 |
_version_ | 1785029898352459776 |
---|---|
author | Stackhouse, Ashlyn A Rafi, Damir Walls, Risheka Dodd, Rebecca V Badger, Kerry Davies, Daniel J Brown, Celia A Cowell, Adrian Meeran, Karim Halse, Omid Kinross, James Lupton, Martin Hughes, Elizabeth A Sam, Amir H |
author_facet | Stackhouse, Ashlyn A Rafi, Damir Walls, Risheka Dodd, Rebecca V Badger, Kerry Davies, Daniel J Brown, Celia A Cowell, Adrian Meeran, Karim Halse, Omid Kinross, James Lupton, Martin Hughes, Elizabeth A Sam, Amir H |
author_sort | Stackhouse, Ashlyn A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study compared knowledge attainment and student enjoyment and engagement between clinical case vignette, patient-testimony videos and mixed reality (MR) teaching via the Microsoft HoloLens 2, all delivered remotely to third year medical students. The feasibility of conducting MR teaching on a large scale was also assessed. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medical students in Year 3 at Imperial College London participated in three online teaching sessions, one in each format. All students were expected to attend these scheduled teaching sessions and to complete the formative assessment. Inclusion of their data used as part of the research trial was optional. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was performance on a formative assessment, which served to compare knowledge attainment between three forms of online learning. Moreover, we aimed to explore student engagement with each form of learning via a questionnaire, and also feasibility of applying MR as a teaching tool on a large scale. Comparisons between performances on the formative assessment between the three groups were investigated using a repeated measures two-way ANOVA. Engagement and enjoyment were also analysed in the same manner. RESULTS: A total of 252 students participated in the study. Knowledge attainment of students using MR was comparable with the other two methods. Participants reported higher enjoyment and engagement (p<0.001) for the case vignette method, compared with MR and video-based teaching. There was no difference in enjoyment or engagement ratings between MR and the video-based methods. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the implementation of MR is an effective, acceptable, and feasible way of teaching clinical medicine to undergraduate students on a large scale. However, case-based tutorials were found to be favoured most by students. Future work could further explore the best uses for MR teaching within the medical curriculum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10124742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101247422023-04-25 Knowledge Attainment and Engagement Among Medical Students: A Comparison of Three Forms of Online Learning Stackhouse, Ashlyn A Rafi, Damir Walls, Risheka Dodd, Rebecca V Badger, Kerry Davies, Daniel J Brown, Celia A Cowell, Adrian Meeran, Karim Halse, Omid Kinross, James Lupton, Martin Hughes, Elizabeth A Sam, Amir H Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research OBJECTIVE: This study compared knowledge attainment and student enjoyment and engagement between clinical case vignette, patient-testimony videos and mixed reality (MR) teaching via the Microsoft HoloLens 2, all delivered remotely to third year medical students. The feasibility of conducting MR teaching on a large scale was also assessed. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medical students in Year 3 at Imperial College London participated in three online teaching sessions, one in each format. All students were expected to attend these scheduled teaching sessions and to complete the formative assessment. Inclusion of their data used as part of the research trial was optional. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was performance on a formative assessment, which served to compare knowledge attainment between three forms of online learning. Moreover, we aimed to explore student engagement with each form of learning via a questionnaire, and also feasibility of applying MR as a teaching tool on a large scale. Comparisons between performances on the formative assessment between the three groups were investigated using a repeated measures two-way ANOVA. Engagement and enjoyment were also analysed in the same manner. RESULTS: A total of 252 students participated in the study. Knowledge attainment of students using MR was comparable with the other two methods. Participants reported higher enjoyment and engagement (p<0.001) for the case vignette method, compared with MR and video-based teaching. There was no difference in enjoyment or engagement ratings between MR and the video-based methods. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the implementation of MR is an effective, acceptable, and feasible way of teaching clinical medicine to undergraduate students on a large scale. However, case-based tutorials were found to be favoured most by students. Future work could further explore the best uses for MR teaching within the medical curriculum. Dove 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10124742/ /pubmed/37101695 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S391816 Text en © 2023 Stackhouse et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Stackhouse, Ashlyn A Rafi, Damir Walls, Risheka Dodd, Rebecca V Badger, Kerry Davies, Daniel J Brown, Celia A Cowell, Adrian Meeran, Karim Halse, Omid Kinross, James Lupton, Martin Hughes, Elizabeth A Sam, Amir H Knowledge Attainment and Engagement Among Medical Students: A Comparison of Three Forms of Online Learning |
title | Knowledge Attainment and Engagement Among Medical Students: A Comparison of Three Forms of Online Learning |
title_full | Knowledge Attainment and Engagement Among Medical Students: A Comparison of Three Forms of Online Learning |
title_fullStr | Knowledge Attainment and Engagement Among Medical Students: A Comparison of Three Forms of Online Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Knowledge Attainment and Engagement Among Medical Students: A Comparison of Three Forms of Online Learning |
title_short | Knowledge Attainment and Engagement Among Medical Students: A Comparison of Three Forms of Online Learning |
title_sort | knowledge attainment and engagement among medical students: a comparison of three forms of online learning |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101695 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S391816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stackhouseashlyna knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT rafidamir knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT wallsrisheka knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT doddrebeccav knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT badgerkerry knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT daviesdanielj knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT brownceliaa knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT cowelladrian knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT meerankarim knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT halseomid knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT kinrossjames knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT luptonmartin knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT hugheselizabetha knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning AT samamirh knowledgeattainmentandengagementamongmedicalstudentsacomparisonofthreeformsofonlinelearning |