Cargando…

Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis

Background: In Unilateral (UNI) exercises are more effective than bilateral (BI) exercises in improving athletic performance is debatable. Objectives: this meta-analysis investigated the effects of UNI and BI exercises on different effect indicators of jump ability, sprint ability, maximal force, ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wenfeng, Chen, Xing, Xu, Kun, Xie, Hezhi, Li, Duanying, Ding, Shicong, Sun, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37123275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1128250
_version_ 1785031610320551936
author Zhang, Wenfeng
Chen, Xing
Xu, Kun
Xie, Hezhi
Li, Duanying
Ding, Shicong
Sun, Jian
author_facet Zhang, Wenfeng
Chen, Xing
Xu, Kun
Xie, Hezhi
Li, Duanying
Ding, Shicong
Sun, Jian
author_sort Zhang, Wenfeng
collection PubMed
description Background: In Unilateral (UNI) exercises are more effective than bilateral (BI) exercises in improving athletic performance is debatable. Objectives: this meta-analysis investigated the effects of UNI and BI exercises on different effect indicators of jump ability, sprint ability, maximal force, change of direction ability, and balance ability. Data Sources: PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of science, CNKI, Proquest, Wan Fang Data. Study Eligibility Criteria: To be eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, the study had to be: 1) athletes; 2) UNI training and BI training; 3) the intervention period had to be more than 6 weeks and the intervention frequency had to be more than 2 times/week; 4) the outcome indicators were jumping ability, sprinting ability, maximum strength, and change of direction and balance. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Method: We used the random-effects model for meta-analyses. Effect sizes (standardized mean difference), calculated from measures of horizontally oriented performance, were represented by the standardized mean difference and presented alongside 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 28 papers met the inclusion criteria, and Meta-analysis showed that UNI training was more effective than BI training in improving jumping ability (ES = 0.61.0.23 to 0.09; Z = 3.12, p = 0.002 < 0.01), sprinting ability (ES = −0.02, −0.03 to −0.01; Z = 2.73, p = 0.006 < 0.01), maximum strength (ES = 8.95,2.30 to 15.61; Z = 2.64, p = 0.008 > 0.05), change of direction ability (ES = −0.03, −0.06 to 0.00; Z = 1.90, p = 0.06 > 0.01) and balance ability (ES = 1.41,-0.62 to 3.44; Z = 1.36, p = 0.17 > 0.01). The results of the analysis of moderating variables showed that intervention period, intervention frequency and intervention types all had different indicators of effect on exercise performance. Conclusion: UNI training has a more significant effect on jumping and strength quality for unilateral power patterns, and BI training has a more significant effect on jumping and strength quality for bilateral power patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10133687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101336872023-04-28 Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis Zhang, Wenfeng Chen, Xing Xu, Kun Xie, Hezhi Li, Duanying Ding, Shicong Sun, Jian Front Physiol Physiology Background: In Unilateral (UNI) exercises are more effective than bilateral (BI) exercises in improving athletic performance is debatable. Objectives: this meta-analysis investigated the effects of UNI and BI exercises on different effect indicators of jump ability, sprint ability, maximal force, change of direction ability, and balance ability. Data Sources: PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of science, CNKI, Proquest, Wan Fang Data. Study Eligibility Criteria: To be eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, the study had to be: 1) athletes; 2) UNI training and BI training; 3) the intervention period had to be more than 6 weeks and the intervention frequency had to be more than 2 times/week; 4) the outcome indicators were jumping ability, sprinting ability, maximum strength, and change of direction and balance. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Method: We used the random-effects model for meta-analyses. Effect sizes (standardized mean difference), calculated from measures of horizontally oriented performance, were represented by the standardized mean difference and presented alongside 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 28 papers met the inclusion criteria, and Meta-analysis showed that UNI training was more effective than BI training in improving jumping ability (ES = 0.61.0.23 to 0.09; Z = 3.12, p = 0.002 < 0.01), sprinting ability (ES = −0.02, −0.03 to −0.01; Z = 2.73, p = 0.006 < 0.01), maximum strength (ES = 8.95,2.30 to 15.61; Z = 2.64, p = 0.008 > 0.05), change of direction ability (ES = −0.03, −0.06 to 0.00; Z = 1.90, p = 0.06 > 0.01) and balance ability (ES = 1.41,-0.62 to 3.44; Z = 1.36, p = 0.17 > 0.01). The results of the analysis of moderating variables showed that intervention period, intervention frequency and intervention types all had different indicators of effect on exercise performance. Conclusion: UNI training has a more significant effect on jumping and strength quality for unilateral power patterns, and BI training has a more significant effect on jumping and strength quality for bilateral power patterns. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10133687/ /pubmed/37123275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1128250 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Chen, Xu, Xie, Li, Ding and Sun. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Zhang, Wenfeng
Chen, Xing
Xu, Kun
Xie, Hezhi
Li, Duanying
Ding, Shicong
Sun, Jian
Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis
title Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis
title_full Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis
title_short Effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: A meta-analysis
title_sort effect of unilateral training and bilateral training on physical performance: a meta-analysis
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37123275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1128250
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwenfeng effectofunilateraltrainingandbilateraltrainingonphysicalperformanceametaanalysis
AT chenxing effectofunilateraltrainingandbilateraltrainingonphysicalperformanceametaanalysis
AT xukun effectofunilateraltrainingandbilateraltrainingonphysicalperformanceametaanalysis
AT xiehezhi effectofunilateraltrainingandbilateraltrainingonphysicalperformanceametaanalysis
AT liduanying effectofunilateraltrainingandbilateraltrainingonphysicalperformanceametaanalysis
AT dingshicong effectofunilateraltrainingandbilateraltrainingonphysicalperformanceametaanalysis
AT sunjian effectofunilateraltrainingandbilateraltrainingonphysicalperformanceametaanalysis