Cargando…
Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method
[Image: see text] Nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) are the main emissions of diesel engines. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is the main technology used to reduce NO(x) emissions from diesel engines. NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia (NH(3)) escape are the main indicators to evaluate SCR performanc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00233 |
_version_ | 1785031712338608128 |
---|---|
author | Bi, Yuhua Yan, Jie Liu, Shaohua Xiao, Ben Shen, Lizhong Wang, Peng Nie, Xuexuan |
author_facet | Bi, Yuhua Yan, Jie Liu, Shaohua Xiao, Ben Shen, Lizhong Wang, Peng Nie, Xuexuan |
author_sort | Bi, Yuhua |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) are the main emissions of diesel engines. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is the main technology used to reduce NO(x) emissions from diesel engines. NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia (NH(3)) escape are the main indicators to evaluate SCR performance. In this work, the effects of diesel engine exhaust temperature and exhaust mass flow rate on the SCR performance under different atmospheric pressures were studied by the combination method of experiment and one-dimensional numerical simulation. At the same time, the response surface method (RSM) was used to analyze the interaction of atmospheric pressure, exhaust temperature, and exhaust mass flow rate on the SCR performance. The results show that the lower the atmospheric pressure, the lower the NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia escape. Under the same exhaust temperature, the lower the atmospheric pressure, the smaller the impact of exhaust mass flow rate on NO(x) conversion efficiency. According to the RSM results, the optimal NO(x) conversion efficiency is 78.6% under the combination working conditions of an atmospheric pressure of 100 kPa, exhaust temperature of 395 °C, and exhaust mass flow rate of 250 kg/h, and the NH(3) escape is also at a low level of 1.7 g/cycle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10134216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101342162023-04-28 Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method Bi, Yuhua Yan, Jie Liu, Shaohua Xiao, Ben Shen, Lizhong Wang, Peng Nie, Xuexuan ACS Omega [Image: see text] Nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) are the main emissions of diesel engines. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is the main technology used to reduce NO(x) emissions from diesel engines. NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia (NH(3)) escape are the main indicators to evaluate SCR performance. In this work, the effects of diesel engine exhaust temperature and exhaust mass flow rate on the SCR performance under different atmospheric pressures were studied by the combination method of experiment and one-dimensional numerical simulation. At the same time, the response surface method (RSM) was used to analyze the interaction of atmospheric pressure, exhaust temperature, and exhaust mass flow rate on the SCR performance. The results show that the lower the atmospheric pressure, the lower the NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia escape. Under the same exhaust temperature, the lower the atmospheric pressure, the smaller the impact of exhaust mass flow rate on NO(x) conversion efficiency. According to the RSM results, the optimal NO(x) conversion efficiency is 78.6% under the combination working conditions of an atmospheric pressure of 100 kPa, exhaust temperature of 395 °C, and exhaust mass flow rate of 250 kg/h, and the NH(3) escape is also at a low level of 1.7 g/cycle. American Chemical Society 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10134216/ /pubmed/37125117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00233 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Bi, Yuhua Yan, Jie Liu, Shaohua Xiao, Ben Shen, Lizhong Wang, Peng Nie, Xuexuan Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method |
title | Study on Diesel
Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction
Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response
Surface Method |
title_full | Study on Diesel
Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction
Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response
Surface Method |
title_fullStr | Study on Diesel
Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction
Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response
Surface Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Study on Diesel
Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction
Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response
Surface Method |
title_short | Study on Diesel
Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction
Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response
Surface Method |
title_sort | study on diesel
engine selective catalytic reduction
performance at different atmospheric pressures using the response
surface method |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biyuhua studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod AT yanjie studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod AT liushaohua studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod AT xiaoben studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod AT shenlizhong studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod AT wangpeng studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod AT niexuexuan studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod |