Cargando…

Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method

[Image: see text] Nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) are the main emissions of diesel engines. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is the main technology used to reduce NO(x) emissions from diesel engines. NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia (NH(3)) escape are the main indicators to evaluate SCR performanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bi, Yuhua, Yan, Jie, Liu, Shaohua, Xiao, Ben, Shen, Lizhong, Wang, Peng, Nie, Xuexuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00233
_version_ 1785031712338608128
author Bi, Yuhua
Yan, Jie
Liu, Shaohua
Xiao, Ben
Shen, Lizhong
Wang, Peng
Nie, Xuexuan
author_facet Bi, Yuhua
Yan, Jie
Liu, Shaohua
Xiao, Ben
Shen, Lizhong
Wang, Peng
Nie, Xuexuan
author_sort Bi, Yuhua
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) are the main emissions of diesel engines. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is the main technology used to reduce NO(x) emissions from diesel engines. NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia (NH(3)) escape are the main indicators to evaluate SCR performance. In this work, the effects of diesel engine exhaust temperature and exhaust mass flow rate on the SCR performance under different atmospheric pressures were studied by the combination method of experiment and one-dimensional numerical simulation. At the same time, the response surface method (RSM) was used to analyze the interaction of atmospheric pressure, exhaust temperature, and exhaust mass flow rate on the SCR performance. The results show that the lower the atmospheric pressure, the lower the NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia escape. Under the same exhaust temperature, the lower the atmospheric pressure, the smaller the impact of exhaust mass flow rate on NO(x) conversion efficiency. According to the RSM results, the optimal NO(x) conversion efficiency is 78.6% under the combination working conditions of an atmospheric pressure of 100 kPa, exhaust temperature of 395 °C, and exhaust mass flow rate of 250 kg/h, and the NH(3) escape is also at a low level of 1.7 g/cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10134216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101342162023-04-28 Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method Bi, Yuhua Yan, Jie Liu, Shaohua Xiao, Ben Shen, Lizhong Wang, Peng Nie, Xuexuan ACS Omega [Image: see text] Nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) are the main emissions of diesel engines. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is the main technology used to reduce NO(x) emissions from diesel engines. NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia (NH(3)) escape are the main indicators to evaluate SCR performance. In this work, the effects of diesel engine exhaust temperature and exhaust mass flow rate on the SCR performance under different atmospheric pressures were studied by the combination method of experiment and one-dimensional numerical simulation. At the same time, the response surface method (RSM) was used to analyze the interaction of atmospheric pressure, exhaust temperature, and exhaust mass flow rate on the SCR performance. The results show that the lower the atmospheric pressure, the lower the NO(x) conversion efficiency and ammonia escape. Under the same exhaust temperature, the lower the atmospheric pressure, the smaller the impact of exhaust mass flow rate on NO(x) conversion efficiency. According to the RSM results, the optimal NO(x) conversion efficiency is 78.6% under the combination working conditions of an atmospheric pressure of 100 kPa, exhaust temperature of 395 °C, and exhaust mass flow rate of 250 kg/h, and the NH(3) escape is also at a low level of 1.7 g/cycle. American Chemical Society 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10134216/ /pubmed/37125117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00233 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Bi, Yuhua
Yan, Jie
Liu, Shaohua
Xiao, Ben
Shen, Lizhong
Wang, Peng
Nie, Xuexuan
Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method
title Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method
title_full Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method
title_fullStr Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method
title_full_unstemmed Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method
title_short Study on Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction Performance at Different Atmospheric Pressures Using the Response Surface Method
title_sort study on diesel engine selective catalytic reduction performance at different atmospheric pressures using the response surface method
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00233
work_keys_str_mv AT biyuhua studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod
AT yanjie studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod
AT liushaohua studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod
AT xiaoben studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod
AT shenlizhong studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod
AT wangpeng studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod
AT niexuexuan studyondieselengineselectivecatalyticreductionperformanceatdifferentatmosphericpressuresusingtheresponsesurfacemethod