Cargando…

Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for patients with kidney failure. However, one-third of patients awaiting a kidney transplant are highly sensitized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), resulting in an increased waiting time for a suitable kidney, more acute and chroni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudreuilh, C, Jarvis, P, Beadle, N, Pilecka, I, Shaw, O, Gardner, L, Scottà, C, Mamode , N, Game, DS, Sanchez-Fueyo, A, Lombardi, G, Learoyd, A, Douiri, A, Dorling, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37118685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03157-7
_version_ 1785033220882956288
author Dudreuilh, C
Jarvis, P
Beadle, N
Pilecka, I
Shaw, O
Gardner, L
Scottà, C
Mamode , N
Game, DS
Sanchez-Fueyo, A
Lombardi, G
Learoyd, A
Douiri, A
Dorling, A
author_facet Dudreuilh, C
Jarvis, P
Beadle, N
Pilecka, I
Shaw, O
Gardner, L
Scottà, C
Mamode , N
Game, DS
Sanchez-Fueyo, A
Lombardi, G
Learoyd, A
Douiri, A
Dorling, A
author_sort Dudreuilh, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for patients with kidney failure. However, one-third of patients awaiting a kidney transplant are highly sensitized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), resulting in an increased waiting time for a suitable kidney, more acute and chronic rejection, and a shorter graft survival compared to non-highly sensitised patients. Current standard immunosuppression protocols do not adequately suppress memory responses, and so alternative strategies are needed. Autologous polyclonally expanded regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been demonstrated to be safe in transplant settings and could be a potential alternative to modulate memory immune alloresponses. METHODS: The aim of this trial is to determine whether adoptive transfer of autologous Tregs into HLA sensitised patients can suppress memory T and B cell responses against specific HLA antigens. This is a two-part, multi-centre, prospective clinical trial, comprising an observational phase (Part 1) aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to HLA (Pure HLA Proteins) followed by an interventional phase (Part 2). The first 9 patients identified as being eligible in Part 1 will undergo baseline immune monitoring for 2 months to inform statistical analysis of the primary endpoint. Part 2 is an adaptive, open labelled trial based on Simon’s two-stage design, with 21 patients receiving Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs to a dose of 5–10 × 106 cells/kg body weight. The primary EP is suppression of in vitro memory responses for 2 months post-infusion. 12 patients will receive treatment in stage 1 of Part 2, and 9 patients will receive treatment in stage 2 of Part 2 if ≥ 50% patients pass the primary EP in stage 1. DISCUSSION: This is a prospective study aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to Pure HLA Proteins and determine baseline variation in these patterns of response. Part 2 will be an adaptive phase IIa clinical trial with 21 patients receiving a single infusion of GMP-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs in two stages. It remains to be demonstrated that modulating memory alloresponses clinically using Treg therapy is achievable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number: 2021–001,664-23. REC Number: 21/SC/0253. Trial registration number ISRCTN14582152. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-023-03157-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10140710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101407102023-04-29 Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial Dudreuilh, C Jarvis, P Beadle, N Pilecka, I Shaw, O Gardner, L Scottà, C Mamode , N Game, DS Sanchez-Fueyo, A Lombardi, G Learoyd, A Douiri, A Dorling, A BMC Nephrol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for patients with kidney failure. However, one-third of patients awaiting a kidney transplant are highly sensitized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), resulting in an increased waiting time for a suitable kidney, more acute and chronic rejection, and a shorter graft survival compared to non-highly sensitised patients. Current standard immunosuppression protocols do not adequately suppress memory responses, and so alternative strategies are needed. Autologous polyclonally expanded regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been demonstrated to be safe in transplant settings and could be a potential alternative to modulate memory immune alloresponses. METHODS: The aim of this trial is to determine whether adoptive transfer of autologous Tregs into HLA sensitised patients can suppress memory T and B cell responses against specific HLA antigens. This is a two-part, multi-centre, prospective clinical trial, comprising an observational phase (Part 1) aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to HLA (Pure HLA Proteins) followed by an interventional phase (Part 2). The first 9 patients identified as being eligible in Part 1 will undergo baseline immune monitoring for 2 months to inform statistical analysis of the primary endpoint. Part 2 is an adaptive, open labelled trial based on Simon’s two-stage design, with 21 patients receiving Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs to a dose of 5–10 × 106 cells/kg body weight. The primary EP is suppression of in vitro memory responses for 2 months post-infusion. 12 patients will receive treatment in stage 1 of Part 2, and 9 patients will receive treatment in stage 2 of Part 2 if ≥ 50% patients pass the primary EP in stage 1. DISCUSSION: This is a prospective study aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to Pure HLA Proteins and determine baseline variation in these patterns of response. Part 2 will be an adaptive phase IIa clinical trial with 21 patients receiving a single infusion of GMP-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs in two stages. It remains to be demonstrated that modulating memory alloresponses clinically using Treg therapy is achievable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number: 2021–001,664-23. REC Number: 21/SC/0253. Trial registration number ISRCTN14582152. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-023-03157-7. BioMed Central 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10140710/ /pubmed/37118685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03157-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Dudreuilh, C
Jarvis, P
Beadle, N
Pilecka, I
Shaw, O
Gardner, L
Scottà, C
Mamode , N
Game, DS
Sanchez-Fueyo, A
Lombardi, G
Learoyd, A
Douiri, A
Dorling, A
Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial
title Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial
title_full Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial
title_fullStr Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial
title_full_unstemmed Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial
title_short Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial
title_sort can regulatory t cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after hla-ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the phase iia gamechanger-1 trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37118685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03157-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dudreuilhc canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT jarvisp canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT beadlen canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT pileckai canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT shawo canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT gardnerl canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT scottac canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT mamoden canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT gameds canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT sanchezfueyoa canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT lombardig canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT learoyda canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT douiria canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial
AT dorlinga canregulatorytcellsimproveoutcomesofsensitisedpatientsafterhlaabincompatiblerenaltransplantationstudyprotocolforthephaseiiagamechanger1trial