Cargando…
A Review of CRISPR Tools for Treating Usher Syndrome: Applicability, Safety, Efficiency, and In Vivo Delivery
This review considers research into the treatment of Usher syndrome, a deaf-blindness syndrome inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. Usher syndrome mutations are markedly heterogeneous, involving many different genes, and research grants are limited due to minimal patient populations. Furtherm...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10146473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37108761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087603 |
_version_ | 1785034589401513984 |
---|---|
author | Major, Lauren McClements, Michelle E. MacLaren, Robert E. |
author_facet | Major, Lauren McClements, Michelle E. MacLaren, Robert E. |
author_sort | Major, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | This review considers research into the treatment of Usher syndrome, a deaf-blindness syndrome inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. Usher syndrome mutations are markedly heterogeneous, involving many different genes, and research grants are limited due to minimal patient populations. Furthermore, gene augmentation therapies are impossible in all but three Usher syndromes as the cDNA sequence exceeds the 4.7 kb AAV packaging limit. It is, therefore, vital to focus research efforts on alternative tools with the broadest applicability. The CRISPR field took off in recent years following the discovery of the DNA editing activity of Cas9 in 2012. New generations of CRISPR tools have succeeded the original CRISPR/Cas9 model to enable more sophisticated genomic amendments such as epigenetic modification and precise sequence alterations. This review will evaluate the most popular CRISPR tools to date: CRISPR/Cas9, base editing, and prime editing. It will consider these tools in terms of applicability (in relation to the ten most prevalent USH2A mutations), safety, efficiency, and in vivo delivery potential with the intention of guiding future research investment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10146473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101464732023-04-29 A Review of CRISPR Tools for Treating Usher Syndrome: Applicability, Safety, Efficiency, and In Vivo Delivery Major, Lauren McClements, Michelle E. MacLaren, Robert E. Int J Mol Sci Review This review considers research into the treatment of Usher syndrome, a deaf-blindness syndrome inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. Usher syndrome mutations are markedly heterogeneous, involving many different genes, and research grants are limited due to minimal patient populations. Furthermore, gene augmentation therapies are impossible in all but three Usher syndromes as the cDNA sequence exceeds the 4.7 kb AAV packaging limit. It is, therefore, vital to focus research efforts on alternative tools with the broadest applicability. The CRISPR field took off in recent years following the discovery of the DNA editing activity of Cas9 in 2012. New generations of CRISPR tools have succeeded the original CRISPR/Cas9 model to enable more sophisticated genomic amendments such as epigenetic modification and precise sequence alterations. This review will evaluate the most popular CRISPR tools to date: CRISPR/Cas9, base editing, and prime editing. It will consider these tools in terms of applicability (in relation to the ten most prevalent USH2A mutations), safety, efficiency, and in vivo delivery potential with the intention of guiding future research investment. MDPI 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10146473/ /pubmed/37108761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087603 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Major, Lauren McClements, Michelle E. MacLaren, Robert E. A Review of CRISPR Tools for Treating Usher Syndrome: Applicability, Safety, Efficiency, and In Vivo Delivery |
title | A Review of CRISPR Tools for Treating Usher Syndrome: Applicability, Safety, Efficiency, and In Vivo Delivery |
title_full | A Review of CRISPR Tools for Treating Usher Syndrome: Applicability, Safety, Efficiency, and In Vivo Delivery |
title_fullStr | A Review of CRISPR Tools for Treating Usher Syndrome: Applicability, Safety, Efficiency, and In Vivo Delivery |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of CRISPR Tools for Treating Usher Syndrome: Applicability, Safety, Efficiency, and In Vivo Delivery |
title_short | A Review of CRISPR Tools for Treating Usher Syndrome: Applicability, Safety, Efficiency, and In Vivo Delivery |
title_sort | review of crispr tools for treating usher syndrome: applicability, safety, efficiency, and in vivo delivery |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10146473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37108761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majorlauren areviewofcrisprtoolsfortreatingushersyndromeapplicabilitysafetyefficiencyandinvivodelivery AT mcclementsmichellee areviewofcrisprtoolsfortreatingushersyndromeapplicabilitysafetyefficiencyandinvivodelivery AT maclarenroberte areviewofcrisprtoolsfortreatingushersyndromeapplicabilitysafetyefficiencyandinvivodelivery AT majorlauren reviewofcrisprtoolsfortreatingushersyndromeapplicabilitysafetyefficiencyandinvivodelivery AT mcclementsmichellee reviewofcrisprtoolsfortreatingushersyndromeapplicabilitysafetyefficiencyandinvivodelivery AT maclarenroberte reviewofcrisprtoolsfortreatingushersyndromeapplicabilitysafetyefficiencyandinvivodelivery |