Cargando…

Investigating 3D-printed disk compressing against skin for pain relief in intradermal infiltration anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Pain intensity may be varied during the needle advancing through different skin layers, injection into the intradermal layer may exclude mixed pain from deeper planes. This study aimed to investigate whether compressing a three-dimensional (3D)-printed disk against the skin may relieve p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Jiong, Chen, Wenxuan, Liu, Qianyuan, Mi, Jingyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37118673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02088-y
_version_ 1785034984040431616
author Yu, Jiong
Chen, Wenxuan
Liu, Qianyuan
Mi, Jingyi
author_facet Yu, Jiong
Chen, Wenxuan
Liu, Qianyuan
Mi, Jingyi
author_sort Yu, Jiong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain intensity may be varied during the needle advancing through different skin layers, injection into the intradermal layer may exclude mixed pain from deeper planes. This study aimed to investigate whether compressing a three-dimensional (3D)-printed disk against the skin may relieve pain associated with intradermal injection of local anesthetic which mimics the skin test procedure. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 3D-printed disks with projections were designed for this study. Enrolled patients were randomized to receive either a disk compressing against the axillary skin during the intradermal injection of local anesthesia (compressing disk group) or an intradermal injection of local anesthesia without any compression (no compressing disk group). The primary outcomes were pain intensity (100-mm visual analog scale) and satisfaction (5-point Likert scale) as assessed by patients. RESULTS: Ninety patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II physical status receiving intradermal local anesthesia prior to an ultrasound-guided axillary approach were included. Eighty-seven patients completed the study, with 44 and 43 patients in disk and no disk groups, respectively. Pain scores were significantly different (P < 0.001) in compressing disk (median, 10; IQR, 5–20) and no compressing disk (median, 30; IQR, 20–40) groups. The median satisfaction score was 5 in both groups. No complications occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compressing a 3D-printed disk against the skin may reduce intradermal needle pain and offers an effective alternative for nerve block induction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02088-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10148480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101484802023-04-30 Investigating 3D-printed disk compressing against skin for pain relief in intradermal infiltration anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial Yu, Jiong Chen, Wenxuan Liu, Qianyuan Mi, Jingyi BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Pain intensity may be varied during the needle advancing through different skin layers, injection into the intradermal layer may exclude mixed pain from deeper planes. This study aimed to investigate whether compressing a three-dimensional (3D)-printed disk against the skin may relieve pain associated with intradermal injection of local anesthetic which mimics the skin test procedure. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 3D-printed disks with projections were designed for this study. Enrolled patients were randomized to receive either a disk compressing against the axillary skin during the intradermal injection of local anesthesia (compressing disk group) or an intradermal injection of local anesthesia without any compression (no compressing disk group). The primary outcomes were pain intensity (100-mm visual analog scale) and satisfaction (5-point Likert scale) as assessed by patients. RESULTS: Ninety patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II physical status receiving intradermal local anesthesia prior to an ultrasound-guided axillary approach were included. Eighty-seven patients completed the study, with 44 and 43 patients in disk and no disk groups, respectively. Pain scores were significantly different (P < 0.001) in compressing disk (median, 10; IQR, 5–20) and no compressing disk (median, 30; IQR, 20–40) groups. The median satisfaction score was 5 in both groups. No complications occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compressing a 3D-printed disk against the skin may reduce intradermal needle pain and offers an effective alternative for nerve block induction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02088-y. BioMed Central 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10148480/ /pubmed/37118673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02088-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yu, Jiong
Chen, Wenxuan
Liu, Qianyuan
Mi, Jingyi
Investigating 3D-printed disk compressing against skin for pain relief in intradermal infiltration anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title Investigating 3D-printed disk compressing against skin for pain relief in intradermal infiltration anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Investigating 3D-printed disk compressing against skin for pain relief in intradermal infiltration anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Investigating 3D-printed disk compressing against skin for pain relief in intradermal infiltration anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Investigating 3D-printed disk compressing against skin for pain relief in intradermal infiltration anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Investigating 3D-printed disk compressing against skin for pain relief in intradermal infiltration anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort investigating 3d-printed disk compressing against skin for pain relief in intradermal infiltration anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37118673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02088-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yujiong investigating3dprinteddiskcompressingagainstskinforpainreliefinintradermalinfiltrationanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenwenxuan investigating3dprinteddiskcompressingagainstskinforpainreliefinintradermalinfiltrationanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liuqianyuan investigating3dprinteddiskcompressingagainstskinforpainreliefinintradermalinfiltrationanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mijingyi investigating3dprinteddiskcompressingagainstskinforpainreliefinintradermalinfiltrationanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial