Cargando…
Prediction of medical sciences students’ performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Predicting medical science students’ performance on high-stakes examinations has received considerable attention. Machine learning (ML) models are well-known approaches to enhance the accuracy of determining the students’ performance. Accordingly, we aim to provide a comprehensive fram...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064956 |
_version_ | 1785037888205881344 |
---|---|
author | Mastour, Haniye Dehghani, Toktam Jajroudi, Mahdie Moradi, Ehsan Zarei, Mitra Eslami, Saeid |
author_facet | Mastour, Haniye Dehghani, Toktam Jajroudi, Mahdie Moradi, Ehsan Zarei, Mitra Eslami, Saeid |
author_sort | Mastour, Haniye |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Predicting medical science students’ performance on high-stakes examinations has received considerable attention. Machine learning (ML) models are well-known approaches to enhance the accuracy of determining the students’ performance. Accordingly, we aim to provide a comprehensive framework and systematic review protocol for applying ML in predicting medical science students’ performance on high-stakes examinations. Improving the current understanding of the input and output features, preprocessing methods, setting of ML models and required evaluation metrics seems essential. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted by searching the electronic bibliographic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science. The search will be limited to studies published from January 2013 to June 2023. Studies explicitly predicting student performance in high-stakes examinations and referencing their learning outcomes and use of ML models will be included. Two team members will first screen literature meeting the inclusion criteria at the title, abstract and full-text levels. Second, the Best Evidence Medical Education quality framework rates the included literature. Later, two team members will extract data, including the studies’ general data and the ML approach’s details. Finally, the information consensus will be reached and submitted for analysis. The synthesised evidence from this review provides helpful information for medical education policy-makers, stakeholders and other researchers in adopting the ML models to evaluate medical science students’ performance in high-stakes exams. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review protocol summarises findings of existing publications rather than primary data and does not require an ethics review. The results will be disseminated in publications of peer-reviewed journals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10163468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101634682023-05-07 Prediction of medical sciences students’ performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review Mastour, Haniye Dehghani, Toktam Jajroudi, Mahdie Moradi, Ehsan Zarei, Mitra Eslami, Saeid BMJ Open Medical Education and Training INTRODUCTION: Predicting medical science students’ performance on high-stakes examinations has received considerable attention. Machine learning (ML) models are well-known approaches to enhance the accuracy of determining the students’ performance. Accordingly, we aim to provide a comprehensive framework and systematic review protocol for applying ML in predicting medical science students’ performance on high-stakes examinations. Improving the current understanding of the input and output features, preprocessing methods, setting of ML models and required evaluation metrics seems essential. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted by searching the electronic bibliographic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science. The search will be limited to studies published from January 2013 to June 2023. Studies explicitly predicting student performance in high-stakes examinations and referencing their learning outcomes and use of ML models will be included. Two team members will first screen literature meeting the inclusion criteria at the title, abstract and full-text levels. Second, the Best Evidence Medical Education quality framework rates the included literature. Later, two team members will extract data, including the studies’ general data and the ML approach’s details. Finally, the information consensus will be reached and submitted for analysis. The synthesised evidence from this review provides helpful information for medical education policy-makers, stakeholders and other researchers in adopting the ML models to evaluate medical science students’ performance in high-stakes exams. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review protocol summarises findings of existing publications rather than primary data and does not require an ethics review. The results will be disseminated in publications of peer-reviewed journals. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10163468/ /pubmed/37142312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064956 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Mastour, Haniye Dehghani, Toktam Jajroudi, Mahdie Moradi, Ehsan Zarei, Mitra Eslami, Saeid Prediction of medical sciences students’ performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review |
title | Prediction of medical sciences students’ performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Prediction of medical sciences students’ performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Prediction of medical sciences students’ performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of medical sciences students’ performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Prediction of medical sciences students’ performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | prediction of medical sciences students’ performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mastourhaniye predictionofmedicalsciencesstudentsperformanceonhighstakesexaminationsusingmachinelearningmodelsaprotocolforasystematicreview AT dehghanitoktam predictionofmedicalsciencesstudentsperformanceonhighstakesexaminationsusingmachinelearningmodelsaprotocolforasystematicreview AT jajroudimahdie predictionofmedicalsciencesstudentsperformanceonhighstakesexaminationsusingmachinelearningmodelsaprotocolforasystematicreview AT moradiehsan predictionofmedicalsciencesstudentsperformanceonhighstakesexaminationsusingmachinelearningmodelsaprotocolforasystematicreview AT zareimitra predictionofmedicalsciencesstudentsperformanceonhighstakesexaminationsusingmachinelearningmodelsaprotocolforasystematicreview AT eslamisaeid predictionofmedicalsciencesstudentsperformanceonhighstakesexaminationsusingmachinelearningmodelsaprotocolforasystematicreview |