Cargando…
Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization
BACKGROUND: The spectrum of mutations in a collection of cancer genomes can be described by a mixture of a few mutational signatures. The mutational signatures can be found using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). To extract the mutational signatures we have to assume a distribution for the ob...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37158829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05304-1 |
_version_ | 1785038327191175168 |
---|---|
author | Pelizzola, Marta Laursen, Ragnhild Hobolth, Asger |
author_facet | Pelizzola, Marta Laursen, Ragnhild Hobolth, Asger |
author_sort | Pelizzola, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The spectrum of mutations in a collection of cancer genomes can be described by a mixture of a few mutational signatures. The mutational signatures can be found using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). To extract the mutational signatures we have to assume a distribution for the observed mutational counts and a number of mutational signatures. In most applications, the mutational counts are assumed to be Poisson distributed, and the rank is chosen by comparing the fit of several models with the same underlying distribution and different values for the rank using classical model selection procedures. However, the counts are often overdispersed, and thus the Negative Binomial distribution is more appropriate. RESULTS: We propose a Negative Binomial NMF with a patient specific dispersion parameter to capture the variation across patients and derive the corresponding update rules for parameter estimation. We also introduce a novel model selection procedure inspired by cross-validation to determine the number of signatures. Using simulations, we study the influence of the distributional assumption on our method together with other classical model selection procedures. We also present a simulation study with a method comparison where we show that state-of-the-art methods are highly overestimating the number of signatures when overdispersion is present. We apply our proposed analysis on a wide range of simulated data and on two real data sets from breast and prostate cancer patients. On the real data we describe a residual analysis to investigate and validate the model choice. CONCLUSIONS: With our results on simulated and real data we show that our model selection procedure is more robust at determining the correct number of signatures under model misspecification. We also show that our model selection procedure is more accurate than the available methods in the literature for finding the true number of signatures. Lastly, the residual analysis clearly emphasizes the overdispersion in the mutational count data. The code for our model selection procedure and Negative Binomial NMF is available in the R package SigMoS and can be found at https://github.com/MartaPelizzola/SigMoS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-023-05304-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10165836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101658362023-05-09 Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization Pelizzola, Marta Laursen, Ragnhild Hobolth, Asger BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: The spectrum of mutations in a collection of cancer genomes can be described by a mixture of a few mutational signatures. The mutational signatures can be found using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). To extract the mutational signatures we have to assume a distribution for the observed mutational counts and a number of mutational signatures. In most applications, the mutational counts are assumed to be Poisson distributed, and the rank is chosen by comparing the fit of several models with the same underlying distribution and different values for the rank using classical model selection procedures. However, the counts are often overdispersed, and thus the Negative Binomial distribution is more appropriate. RESULTS: We propose a Negative Binomial NMF with a patient specific dispersion parameter to capture the variation across patients and derive the corresponding update rules for parameter estimation. We also introduce a novel model selection procedure inspired by cross-validation to determine the number of signatures. Using simulations, we study the influence of the distributional assumption on our method together with other classical model selection procedures. We also present a simulation study with a method comparison where we show that state-of-the-art methods are highly overestimating the number of signatures when overdispersion is present. We apply our proposed analysis on a wide range of simulated data and on two real data sets from breast and prostate cancer patients. On the real data we describe a residual analysis to investigate and validate the model choice. CONCLUSIONS: With our results on simulated and real data we show that our model selection procedure is more robust at determining the correct number of signatures under model misspecification. We also show that our model selection procedure is more accurate than the available methods in the literature for finding the true number of signatures. Lastly, the residual analysis clearly emphasizes the overdispersion in the mutational count data. The code for our model selection procedure and Negative Binomial NMF is available in the R package SigMoS and can be found at https://github.com/MartaPelizzola/SigMoS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-023-05304-1. BioMed Central 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10165836/ /pubmed/37158829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05304-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pelizzola, Marta Laursen, Ragnhild Hobolth, Asger Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization |
title | Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization |
title_full | Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization |
title_fullStr | Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization |
title_full_unstemmed | Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization |
title_short | Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization |
title_sort | model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using negative binomial non-negative matrix factorization |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37158829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05304-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pelizzolamarta modelselectionandrobustinferenceofmutationalsignaturesusingnegativebinomialnonnegativematrixfactorization AT laursenragnhild modelselectionandrobustinferenceofmutationalsignaturesusingnegativebinomialnonnegativematrixfactorization AT hobolthasger modelselectionandrobustinferenceofmutationalsignaturesusingnegativebinomialnonnegativematrixfactorization |